Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 5

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  defect of discretion of judgment
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Brak rozeznania oceniającego - przyczyną nieważności małżeństwa w świetle wyroku Roty Rzymskiej z 16 X 1988 r. c. Bruno

100%
Góralski W.
Ius Matrimoniale
|
1991
|
vol. 2
88-101
EN
L’autore presenta e commenta la sentenza definitiva del turno rotale (pronunciata in terza istanza) c. Bruno il 16 dicembre 1988 in causa Meliten, di nullità del matrimonio „ob gravem defectum discretionis indicii” dal convenuto. Le nozze delle parti furono celebrate il 12 agosto 1944. Dopo il divorzio civile (1976) l’attrice aveva accusato la nullità del suo matrimonio presso il tribunale di prima istanza „ob gravem defectum discretionis iudicii” nonché „ob exclusionem boni fidei” dal marito. Il 15 aprille 1980 il tribunale si è prounciato „pro invaliditate”ma solo „ob gravem defectum discretionis iudicii”. L’appello interposto alla Rota Romana provcó la sentanza negativa - dai due titoli di invalidità - il 1 marzo 1984. Apellato il nuovo turno rotale ha dichiarato la nullità del matrimonio, come è stato detto sopra. La sentenza definitiva è stata dunque pronunciata perfino dopo 44 anni dalla celebrazione delle nozze.
2
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Gravis defectus discretionis iudicii w opublikowanych wyrokach Roty Rzymskiej z 2005 r. Część I

100%
Góralski W.
Ius Matrimoniale
|
2014
|
vol. 25
|
issue 3
57-76
EN
On the basis of analysis of 20 sentencees of the Roma Rota of 2005 the author presents an issue of discretio iudicii, which is considered a prerequisite element of marital consensus, being a human act, assuming both an act of mind and will, thus, ability to understand, evaluate and choose freely. He also discusses essential elements of this discernment (sufficient intellectual recognition of the subject of marital consensus; sufficient critical evaluation as regards marriage as such, as well as reasons of contracting marriage and reasons of contracting marriage with a particular person; sufficient inner freedom in view of the said reasons and overcoming inner impulses). Next, he focuses on an issue of evaluative discernment (essential marital rights and obligations) and serious lack of this discernment.
3
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Wpływ psychozy maniakalno-depresyjnej na poważny brak rozeznania oceniającego w świetle wyroku Coram Turnaturi z 20 lutego 1998 r.

84%
Leszczyński G.
Ius Matrimoniale
|
2009
|
vol. 20
|
issue 14
171-185
EN
L’incidenza di psicosi maniaco-depressiva sul difetto di discrezione di giudizio alla luce della sentenza coram Turnaturi del 28 febbraio 1998. Il can. 1095, primo tra i vizi del consenso matrimoniale, riguarda l’incapacità proveniente dalle mancanze d’inteletto e di volontà. Come causa di questa incapacità, in presente articolo, viene segnata la psicosi maniaco- epressiva. Questa psicosi di carattere bipolare, cioè di presenza di due episodi diversi, quello maniacale e quello depressivo, viene considerata sotto l’aspetto che riguarda la sua incidenza sull’incapacità descritta nel can. 1095, 2° CIC.L’analisi fatta, in particolare quella che riguarda la sentenza coram Turnaturi del 28 febbraio 1998 ci permette di formulare una conclusione che la psicosi maniaco-depressiva è la causa dell’incapacità consensuale di cui parla il can. 1095 per quanto riguarda la mancanza del discrezione di giudizio. Questo succede nei casi di mania e di depressione grave, i quali sono presenti nel soggetto prima di compiere l’atto di matrimonio.Bisogna sottolineare che è sempre il compito del giudice di esaminare gli atti della causa e di decidere se in ogni singolo caso la psicosi è stata così grave da impedire il valido consenso matrimoniale. Per prendere ogni decisione il giudice usa le prove tra cui quella periziale, fondamentale, accanto alle dichiarazioni delle parti e dei testi, per provare l’influsso della psicosi  aniaco-depressiva sull’incapacità consensuale del nubente.
4
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Wyrok Sądu Kościelnego we Włocławku (c. Grzęźlikowski) z 13.10.1997 r. w sprawie o nieważność małżeństwa z tytułu poważnego braku rozeznania oceniającego co do istotnych praw i obowiązków małżeńskich (kan. 1095, n. 2 KPK)

67%
Grzęźlikowski c.
Ius Matrimoniale
|
2003
|
vol. 14
|
issue 8
231-241
EN
Plaintiff brought a suit against his matrimony contracted with N. on 22nd of January 1984 in Saint Patrick's Cathedral in Auckland in New Zealand. N. in virtue of lack of judging discernment regarding matrimonial rights and duties on his side (can. 1095, 2 Code of Canonical Proeedings) suggesting that in was caused by fact that being on emigration in New Zealand, missing the country of origin and family, being mentally woebegone and being depressed, he had restricted will and critical cognizance and was not able to have evaluotion of matrimonial agreement subject and its free choice. He also thought that because of arisen situation and due to his individualistic immaturity in moment of contracting the matrimony, he had lack of judging discernment regarding the matrimonial rights and dubes. He lodged a complaint for nullity of marriage to the tribunal of his place of residence in March 1996. Defendant was living in England in that time. Tribunal Włocławek obtained - acco rding to canonic regulations 1673, 4 Code of C nonical Proceedings - a permission to wunduct a case from the tribunal of defendant's place of residence. Hearing of evidence induded hearing of the parties, witnesses and examination of the plaintiff by psychologist expert appointed by the wurt, who issued an opinion. Confronting the legal motives submitted in case with actual real motives, after taking the cognizance of plaintiffs notes after publishing the files of a case and before – sentence notes of the defender of matrimonial union, the board of judges passed a sentence in favour of validity of appealed marriage. It was found that: 1. plaintiff could be really actually mentally depressed, emotionally trembling, he missed his country and family, however that state was not as strong and serious to make him not to realize the fact of what the marriage was; 2. facts that he left Poland by himself and chose emigration by himself indicate that he was self-dependent and individualistically mature; 3. lack of discernment was not confirmed by testimonies of defendant and witnesses as well as circumstances of marriage contracting, its course and actual reasons of marriage breakdown; 4. expert appointed by the court found the plaintiff individualistically mature and found no reasons that would cause the plaintiff to have of ability of due judgment of what the matrimony is and which obligations it put him under as well as ability to express matrimonial consent; 5. plaintifs cognitive and volitive powers were able to evaluate correctly the resulted situation, correctly express matrimonial consent and express matrimonial consent in correct and volid way. Second Instance Tribunal from Gniezno confirmal a sentence of Tribunal form Włocławek suggesting the plaintiff to possibly lodge a complaint for nullity of marriage in virtue of simulation of matrimonial condent on his side.
5
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Błąd co do przymiotu osoby (kan. 1097 § 2 KPK), brak rozeznania oceniającego (kan. 1095, n. 2) i niezdolność do podjęcia istotnych obowiązków małżeńskich (kan. 1095. n. 3 KPK) w świetle wyroku Roty Rzymskiej c. De Angelis z 16 czerwca 2006 roku

51%
Góralski W.
Ius Matrimoniale
|
2012
|
vol. 23
|
issue 17
139-159
EN
L’autore presenta e commenta la sentenza della Rota Romana c. De Angelis nella causa Reg. Apuli seu Baren. Nullitatis matrimonii del 16 giugno 2006, giudicata dai cinque titoli di invalidità, tra i quali i due sono stati introdotti dopo l’appello dalla sentenza della prima istanza. Nella sua sentenza il turno rotale ha pronunciato – come tribunale di prima istanza –l’invalidità del matrimonio solo dal titolo l’incapacitas assumendi dalla parte dell’attore.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.