Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 3

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  defect of marital consent
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Bojaźń szacunkowa w wyroku c. Ferreira Pena z 30 października 2013 roku

100%
Dzierżon G.
Ius Matrimoniale
|
2021
|
vol. 32
|
issue 2
145-160
EN
The presented study is a commentary on the affirmative judgment of the Roman Rota c. Ferreira Pena of 30 October 2013. In the structure of the study, the author discussed in detail the various segments of the judgment: the course of the case, legal and factual motives. In the commentary he showed that the ponens’ inference consisted in the implementation of the ratio of the reverential fear which is the protection of the nupturient’s freedom to marry, which was the case of Lycien. He proved the adopted thesis by means of direct and indirect proof. Firstly, he proved that the plaintiff’s statements were supported by the testimony of witnesses and the circumstances of the case; secondly, he proved that the plaintiff had a serious aversion to entering into marriage.
PL
Zaprezentowane opracowanie jest komentarzem do afirmatywnego wyroku Roty Rzymskiej c. Ferreira Pena z 30 października 2013 roku. W strukturze opracowania Autor szczegółowo omówił poszczególne segmenty rozstrzygnięcia: przebieg sprawy, motywy prawne oraz faktyczne. W komentarzu wykazał, iż wnioskowanie ponensa polegało na implantacji ratio tytułu bojaźni szacunkowej jaką jest ochrona wolności nupturienta w zawieraniu małżeństwa, jaką była sprawa Lycien. Przyjętą tezę udowodnił za pomocą dowodzenia bezpośredniego oraz pośredniego. Po pierwsze dowiódł, iż oświadczenia powoda zostały poparte zeznaniami świadków oraz okolicznościami sprawy; po drugie, wykazał wystąpienie u powoda poważnej awersji do zawieranego małżeństwa.
2
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Wykluczenie dobra sakramentu, dobra wiary oraz dobra potomstwa po stronie pozwanej, a także wykluczenie dobra potomstwa po stronie powodowej (kan. 1101 § 2 KPK) w wyroku Roty Rzymskiej c. Bottone z 2 lutego 2010 roku

67%
Dzierżon G.
Ius Matrimoniale
|
2020
|
vol. 31
|
issue 2
115-130
EN
In the presented study the Author commented on the judgment of the Roman Rota c. Bottone of 2 February 2010. The analysis shows that the legal part of the rotal judgment was based on the general theory of a legal act. In the factual part ponens accumulated two titles exclusion of the good of the sacrament and exclusion of the good of faith. The invalidity of the marriage was proven using indirect proof. In the present case, it has been shown that what prompted the defendant to take such a step was the fact that even before the marriage she had maintained a relationship with another man. It was also proved that the plaintiff's exclusion of offspring was in close connection with the defendant's change of attitude towards him.
3

Wpływ błędu na ważność zgody małżeńskiej

67%
Kwiecień P.
Roczniki Nauk Prawnych
|
2013
|
vol. 23
|
issue 3
145-162
EN
One of the defects of matrimonial consent is error. Error in canon law is a belief that is contrary to the legal reality, a false judgment concerning a thing, law, or an act in law. Error causes marriage to be invalid if it concerns a spouse or his or her attributes. Error as to the spouse affects will when it applies to his or her identity. Error in relation to the attributes affects will if it is directly and substantially intended. This error can affect any attribute as long as the latter is special and meaningful – only then does it become part of the object of consent and dominates the subject. The attribute becomes the main element of the object of matrimonial consent. Legal error – concerning unity, indissolubility, or sacramental dignity of marriage – renders marriage invalid since it determines will.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.