Search results

1

Polska delegacja na rozmowy pokojowe w Rydze; słabości, niekompetencja, politykierstwo

100%

Biały A.

Zeszyty Naukowe Ostrołęckiego Towarzystwa Naukowego

|

2021

|

issue XXXV

75-92

PL

Artykuł ukazuje bolszewickie zasady moralne, którymi kierowali się delegaci sowieccy prowadzący rozmowy pokojowe w Rydze, oraz ich fachowość i kompetencje. Ukazane są słabość i niekompetencje oraz politykierstwo delegacji polskiej. Przedstawione są rezultaty zawartych ustaleń i ich realizacja przez stronę sowiecką.

2

Poprawna interpretacja kan. 538 § 3 i kan. 1110 z Kodeksu Jana Pawła II. Dwa zapytania z Krakowa do Papieskiej Rady ds. Tekstów Prawnych

63%

Rozkrut T.

Ius Matrimoniale

|

2020

|

vol. 31

|

issue 2

5-29

EN

This article presents two inquiries directed to the Pontifical Council for Legislative Texts by canonists from Cracow. The presentation in question was preceded by synthetic indication of rules for performing interpretation of the Church’s law, specifically the role of the Pontifical Council for Legislative Texts. This special Dicastery of the Roman Curia also provides answers to numerous inquiries, thus providing assistance to various authorities and individual people of faith in interpreting norms that are, basically obvious, but that raise doubts. In such cases it is used to clarify the arose doubt and contributes to correct interpretation of the existing law in practice. It arises from the provided answers that the institution of parish priest is regarded as stable, which is clearly stated in can. 522 of the Code of Canon Law. One of the elements that are a guarantor of the parish priest institution, though not listed outright by the general legislator, is a possibility to remain in the position until one reaches seventy five years of age. This also confirms that this age, that is determined in the Code, cannot be changed by the particular legislator in any valid manner. Thus, also the possible customs in a given Diocese that were introduced after John Paul II promulgated the post-conciliar code in 1983 that are in contradiction to provisions included in that Code must be regarded as erroneous, as they are not in line with can. 26. Explanation provided by the Pontifical Council for Legislative Texts in regards to the arose doubt of a possibility to grant delegation by a personal parish priest to bless canonical marriage also occurred to be important in practice. Likewise territorial parish priest, personal parish priest has identical authorizations in this matter. As it can be observed, the Pontifical Council for Legislative Texts provides very useful and competent help in solving various legal doubts that are of great importance for functioning of the Church. If even before getting competent answers a large number of canonist had similar views to those presented in explanations, which was actually demonstrated, then the answers provided by the Vatican indicate a definitive solutions to the arose doubts and at the same time encourage those who – assuredly not out of ill will –succumbed to very subjective and erroneous interpretation, to correct it.

3

Status kanoniczny małżeństw zawieranych przy asystowaniu kapłanów Bractwa Kapłańskiego Świętego Piusa X (FSSPX) po wydaniu listu Papieskiej Komisji Ecclesia Dei z 27 marca 2017 r.

63%

Pietras D.

Ius Matrimoniale

|

2022

|

vol. 33

|

issue 1

79-116

EN

On the initiative of pope Francis, by the letter of the Pontifical Commission Ecclesia Dei of March 27, 2017, norms were introduced for granting delegation to priests, before whom the faithful attached to the Priestly Fraternity of Saint Pius X wish to marry. The priests of this community, which is part of the Catholic Church, are canonically irregular and do not have the status of ordinary or parish priest. So they need the required delegation ad validitatem to assist in getting married. In the light of the document under discussion, such a delegation is issued by the local ordinary. The community, using the issued regulations, maintains the thesis that marriages contracted before a priest of the FSSPX without delegation, referring – due to the situation of the Church after the Second Vatican Council – to the extraordinary canonical form of marriage and to a common error, as well as a positive and probable doubt in the light of can. 144 of the Code of the Canon Law of 1983. The Holy See, in the documents issued by the Pontifical Commission Ecclesia Dei and the decrees and sentences of the Tribunal of the Roman Rota, maintains the position that these marriages are contracted invalid due to the lack of a canonical form.

PL

Z inicjatywy papieża Franciszka listem Papieskiej Komisji Ecclesia Dei z 27 marca 2017 r. wprowadzono normy udzielania delegacji kapłanom, przed którymi wierni przywiązani do Bractwa Kapłańskiego Świętego Piusa X (FSSPX) pragną zawrzeć małżeństwo. Kapłani tej wspólnoty, będącej częścią Kościoła katolickiego, trwają bowiem w nieregularności kanonicznej i nie posiadają statusu ordynariusza bądź proboszcza. Potrzebują więc wymaganej delegacji ad validitatem do asystowania przy zawarciu małżeństwa. W świetle omawianego dokumentu taką delegację wydaje ordynariusz miejsca. Wspólnota korzystając z wydanych regulacji, podtrzymuje jednak tezę o ważności małżeństw zawartych przed kapłanem z FSSPX bez delegacji, powołując się – z powodu sytuacji Kościoła po II Soborze Watykańskim – na nadzwyczajną formę kanoniczną zawarcia małżeństwa oraz na błąd powszechny, a także wątpliwość pozytywną i prawdopodobną w świetle kan. 144 KPK/83. Stolica Apostolska w dokumentach wydanych przez Papieską Komisję Ecclesia Dei oraz dekretach i wyrokach Trybunału Roty Rzymskiej utrzymuje stanowisko, iż małżeństwa te są zawierane nieważnie z powodu braku formy kanonicznej.

Refine search results

2 Ius Matrimoniale

1 Zeszyty Naukowe Ostrołęckiego Towarzystwa Naukowego

1 Biały A.

1 Pietras D.

1 Rozkrut T.

1 2022

1 2021

1 2020

Polska delegacja na rozmowy pokojowe w Rydze; słabości, niekompetencja, politykierstwo

Poprawna interpretacja kan. 538 § 3 i kan. 1110 z Kodeksu Jana Pawła II. Dwa zapytania z Krakowa do Papieskiej Rady ds. Tekstów Prawnych

Status kanoniczny małżeństw zawieranych przy asystowaniu kapłanów Bractwa Kapłańskiego Świętego Piusa X (FSSPX) po wydaniu listu Papieskiej Komisji Ecclesia Dei z 27 marca 2017 r.