Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 5

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  discretion of judgment
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Gravis defectus discretionis iudicii w opublikowanych wyrokach Roty Rzymskiej z 2005 r. Część II

100%
Góralski W.
Ius Matrimoniale
|
2014
|
vol. 25
|
issue 4
27-44
EN
A serious lack of evaluative discernment, as regards essential marital rights and obligations arises from a serious disruption of a cognitive, critical, evaluative, consideration act or an act regarding choice – as regards essential marital rights and obligations. As far as intellectual acts are concerned, a serious lack of evaluative discernment results in dysfunctions of cognitive and critical acts, that is evaluative ones, which prevent from correct cognition and proper evaluation of essential marital rights and obligations; as regards an act of will, its lack results from dysfunction of volitional act, which destruct freedom of choice. In proving a serious lack of evaluative discernment as far as essential marital rights and obligations are concerned, all evidence determined in CIC and Dignitas connubii Instruction are used, and the Rota decrees give the greatest attention to direct evidence, which are evidence of experts.
2
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Poważny brak rozeznania oceniającego (kan. 1095, n. 2 KPK) w wyroku Roty Rzymskiej c. Caberletti z 20 listopada 2018 roku

84%
Góralski W.
Ius Matrimoniale
|
2020
|
vol. 31
|
issue 2
91-114
EN
The sentence of the Roman Rota, c. Caberletti, concerns the marriage of a 34-year-old man, which was concluded in a certain haste. Therefore, from the very beginning the parties lived side by side, and after less than two years they broke up. The immediate reason for the claimant's departure was the defendant's infertility. The case for nullity was initiated by a man pointing to two grounds of nullity: a mistake as to the attribute of a woman intended directly and principally (can. 1097 § 2 CIC) and the exclusion of the indissolubility of marriage by the woman (can. 1101 § 2 CIC). After the handing down (in 2006) of a negative verdict on both headings, the man resigned from the appeal. However, wishing to regulate his civil status, after eight years (in 2014) he applied for the nullity of his marriage to another Tribunal – this time due to a grave defect of discretion of judgment the essential matrimonial tights and duties mutually to be handed over and accepted (can. 1095, n. 2 CIC). Two years later, nullity of the marriage had not been ruled, and the man appealed against it to the Roman Rota, where a positive decision was made. The opinion of an expert in a rotating instance played a significant role in the positive outcome of the case.
3
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Poważny brak rozeznania oceniającego (kan. 1095, n. 2 KPK) w wyroku Roty Rzymskiej c. Salvatori z 7 maja 2020 roku

84%
Góralski W.
Ius Matrimoniale
|
2019
|
vol. 30
|
issue 4
101-122
EN
The negative sentence c. Salvatori in the case under the gravis defectus discretionis iudicii (can. 1095, n. 2 CIC) on both sides, taken in the second instance, when the first ruled positively in relation to both parties, is an example of a reliable assessment of the collected material evidence. In the sentence, quite a lot of space was devoted to the role and tasks of an expert in the cases of can. 1095, n. 1-3 CIC. It is worth emphasizing here that an opinion prepared solely on the basis of the case file is not a true expert opinion. Salvatori pointed to the practice developed in rotational jurisprudence, according to which a judge should reject an expert’s conclusions when they do not comply with the case files or violate the rules of logic or go beyond the premises on which they are based, or when they are inconsistent with Christian anthropology. Ponens convincingly demonstrated the groundlessness of prof. D. (with respect to the woman) grossly inconsistent with the case files and going far beyond the premises that served him to formulate such a thesis.  
4
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Poważny brak rozeznania oceniającego (kan. 1095 n. 2 KPK) oraz wykluczenie nierozerwalności małżeństwa (kan. 1101 § 2 KPK) w świetle wyroku Trybunału Roty Nuncjatury Apostolskiej w Hiszpanii c. Morán Bustos z 9 lipca 2007 r.

59%
Białobrzeski T.
Ius Matrimoniale
|
2013
|
vol. 24
|
issue 18
233-246
EN
Presented sentence of the Tribunal of the Rota of the Apostolic Nunciature in Spain adjudicate definitely in II instance adjudication nulitatis matrimonii by virtue of grave defect of discretion of judgment concerning by both parties (can. 1101 § 2 CCL) and lack of the freedom internal also by both parties (can. 1095 n 2 CCL). The question which was considering concerned matrimony which was got in 15.03.1972. The libellus was lodged in 26.04.1996. Tribunal I instance in sentence of 15.11.2000 declared that there was no proved the nullity of the marriage. The petitioner lodged appeal to the Rote of the Spain. In 09.07.2009 the Rote declared the validity of the marriage.
5
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Błąd co do przymiotu osoby (kan. 1097 § 2 KPK), brak rozeznania oceniającego (kan. 1095, n. 2) i niezdolność do podjęcia istotnych obowiązków małżeńskich (kan. 1095. n. 3 KPK) w świetle wyroku Roty Rzymskiej c. De Angelis z 16 czerwca 2006 roku

51%
Góralski W.
Ius Matrimoniale
|
2012
|
vol. 23
|
issue 17
139-159
EN
L’autore presenta e commenta la sentenza della Rota Romana c. De Angelis nella causa Reg. Apuli seu Baren. Nullitatis matrimonii del 16 giugno 2006, giudicata dai cinque titoli di invalidità, tra i quali i due sono stati introdotti dopo l’appello dalla sentenza della prima istanza. Nella sua sentenza il turno rotale ha pronunciato – come tribunale di prima istanza –l’invalidità del matrimonio solo dal titolo l’incapacitas assumendi dalla parte dell’attore.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.