Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 5

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  etnonim
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Czy istnieje potrzeba leksykograficznego opracowania terminów antroponomastycznych?

100%
Górny H.
Onomastica
|
2020
|
vol. 64
93-106
EN
The article discusses basic issues related to Polish anthroponomastic terms, their development and frequency, taking into account the variability of terminological units and the co-existence of native and foreign forms (usually Greek or Latin). It presents problems related to defining a term, determining its scope or (in particular cases) status, indicating preferred, permissible or non-recommend- ed variant forms, selection (reduction) of sub-terms, the existence of doublets with a grammatical number, acceptance or rejection of new terms, etc. In the text, among others, the following sources were used: the dictionary “Osnoven sistem i terminologija na slovenskata onomastika” [“Basic system and terminology of Slavic onomastics”] (1983), an article by Mieczysław Karaś “W sprawie polskiej terminologii onomastycznej” [“On Polish onomastic terminology”] (1968), studies by Henryk Górnowicz (1988) and Ewa Jakus-Borkowa (1987), encyclopedia “Polskie nazwy własne” [“Polish proper names”] (1998), the compendium “Słowiańska onomastyka” [“Slavic onomastics”] (2002–2003) and selected articles published in the journal “Onomastica”.The second part of the article presents the history, scope and definitions of the term ethnonym // ethnic name (based on selected compendia, monographs and contributory studies), paying atten- tion to the types of names it covers. In addition, a preliminary structure of an entry in the terminological dictionary has been outlined, including such elements as: the term, its definition, variability // equivalent term, origin // explanation, its English equivalent, examples // usage, context of use, and additional aspects.
2
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Słownictwo określające tożsamość narodową i rasową w społecznościowych słownikach języka polskiego

89%
Niekrewicz A. A.
Język. Religia. Tożsamość
|
2017
|
issue 1(15)
47-57
EN
The aim of the article is the description of registered by amateur online dictionaries names of people because of their nationality and race. The author carries out semantic and structural analyses of these terms. The next stage of the study is to compare the analysed names with similar vocabulary recorded in traditional dictionaries, allowing to illustrate changes in the last few years and to indicate of development trends. The author assumes that the vocabulary registered in the dictionaries created by amateurs represents a colloquial way of thinking and seeing the world, as well as what is the most interesting in language for an average user. Description of the distinguished set of vocabulary, rather representative of the general terms in online dictionaries, may be helpful in the characteristics of the entire vocabulary recorded by amateur online dictionaries.
3
Content available remote

Stereotypy etniczne w różnych językach – narodowe? Międzynarodowe? Uniwersalne?

89%
Tyrpa A.
LingVaria : Półrocznik Wydziału Polonistyki UJ poświęcony zagadnieniom języka i językoznawstwa
|
2013
|
issue 1(15)
145-154
EN
The paper discusses ethnic stereotypes petrified in different languages and referring to other nations. According to some researchers, in the lexis and phraseology of a given language, certain units can be distinguished which are only limited to this language. The article collects several examples from which it comes to light that when wider material is considered (including the history of a language, dialects and jargons), some lexemes and phrasemes are found to be present not in one, but in many languages. Analysis of numerous ethnic stereotypes in different languages reveals that transnational semantic patterns exist which are realized independently of linguistic affinity, e.g. in Indo-European as well as in Finno-Ugric languages. These patterns (models) contain slots for specific ethnonyms; how they are filled depends on extra-linguistic factors: historical experience, geographical neighbourhood, mutual friendly or hostile relations. The existence of petrified references to other nations in each language appears to be a universal feature. Specific realization of general semantic models is only partially studied.
4
Content available remote

Болгары - это мы или другие? (Само)идентификация павликан из Баната

89%
Вучкович М., Обижаевa М.
Etnolingwistyka. Problemy Języka i Kultury
|
2008
|
vol. 20
333-348
PL
Artykuł oparty jest na badaniach przeprowadzonych wśród Paulicjan na terytorium zachodniego Banatu (Serbia) przez naukowców z Instytutu Studiów Bałkańskich w Belgradzie i z Uniwersytetu w Sofii. W literaturze używa się wielu terminów na określenie tej grupy etnicznej: bułgarscy katolicy, bułgarscy Paulicjanie, Bułgarzy z Banatu, a także палчене, палкене / Palćani, trzy ostatnie to etnonimy używane przez Paulicjan w odniesieniu do samych siebie. Artykuł omawia indywidualne i zbiorowe poczucie tożsamości członków grupy na podstawie wywiadów i ankiet przeprowadzonych z jednym z badanych respondentów. Podczas wywiadów przeprowadzanych przez uczonych z Serbii, informator mówił o swojej grupie etnicznej Palćani (Paulicjanie) i Bugari (Bułgarzy), jednak przy innych okazjach używał innych terminów. Rozmawiając z uczonymi z Bułgarii, używał następujących określeń: palk’êne (mając na myśli „ja/my“) oraz bъlgare (wy). Autorka próbuje wyjaśnić sens użyć i odkryć źródła owej niekonsekwencji terminologicznej.
EN
This paper is based on the fieldwork conducted in the community of Paulicians on the territory of the West Banat (Serbia) by the researchers of the Institute for Balkan Studies (Belgrade) and the University of Sofia. The appellation used for this ethnic group varies in the scholarly literature: Bulgarians Roman-Catholics, Bulgarians Paulicians, the Banat-Bulgarians and палчене, палкене / Palćani, the ethnonym used by Paulicians alone in reference to themselves. The paper explores (self-)identification, be it individual or collective, in the discourse of one of the interlocutors. During the interviews done by the researchers from Serbia, the informant has referred to his community as Palćani (Paulicians) and Bugari (Bulgarians). On some occasions, nevertheless, he has called into question the latter as an affiliation option. Talking to the researchers from Bulgaria he has used these ethnonyms to express the I / we (palk’êne) : you (bъlgare) relation. This paper aims at tracing the factors which caused the informant’s statements on the adequacy of the self-identification as Bulgarian(s) to be inconsistent.
5
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Losy mało znanej mniejszości

62%
Misiak M.
Dzieje Najnowsze
|
2021
|
vol. 53
|
issue 1
315-326
EN
The article attempts to evaluate the monograph by Anna Wilk devoted to the history of a little-known minority, the Lemkos, throughout the twentieth century – from the times of the Second Republic of Poland to the Polish People’s Republic. It critically discusses the author’s approach to the source material and literature on the subject used in the book.
PL
Artykuł stanowi próbę oceny monografii Anny Wilk, poświęconej historii mało znanej mniejszości Łemków w XX stuleciu – od czasów II Rzeczypospolitej po PRL. Omawia krytycznie podejście autorki do wykorzystanego w pracy przekazu źródłowego i literatury przedmiotu.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.