Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Refine search results

Journals help

  1. 3 Ius Matrimoniale

Authors help

  1. 3 Góralski W.

Years help

  1. 2 2014

  2. 1 2011

Results found: 3

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  gravis defectus discretionis iudicii
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Gravis defectus discretionis iudicii w opublikowanych wyrokach Roty Rzymskiej z 2005 r. Część II

100%
Góralski W.
Ius Matrimoniale
|
2014
|
vol. 25
|
issue 4
27-44
EN
A serious lack of evaluative discernment, as regards essential marital rights and obligations arises from a serious disruption of a cognitive, critical, evaluative, consideration act or an act regarding choice – as regards essential marital rights and obligations. As far as intellectual acts are concerned, a serious lack of evaluative discernment results in dysfunctions of cognitive and critical acts, that is evaluative ones, which prevent from correct cognition and proper evaluation of essential marital rights and obligations; as regards an act of will, its lack results from dysfunction of volitional act, which destruct freedom of choice. In proving a serious lack of evaluative discernment as far as essential marital rights and obligations are concerned, all evidence determined in CIC and Dignitas connubii Instruction are used, and the Rota decrees give the greatest attention to direct evidence, which are evidence of experts.
2
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Gravis defectus discretionis iudicii w opublikowanych wyrokach Roty Rzymskiej z 2005 r. Część I

100%
Góralski W.
Ius Matrimoniale
|
2014
|
vol. 25
|
issue 3
57-76
EN
On the basis of analysis of 20 sentencees of the Roma Rota of 2005 the author presents an issue of discretio iudicii, which is considered a prerequisite element of marital consensus, being a human act, assuming both an act of mind and will, thus, ability to understand, evaluate and choose freely. He also discusses essential elements of this discernment (sufficient intellectual recognition of the subject of marital consensus; sufficient critical evaluation as regards marriage as such, as well as reasons of contracting marriage and reasons of contracting marriage with a particular person; sufficient inner freedom in view of the said reasons and overcoming inner impulses). Next, he focuses on an issue of evaluative discernment (essential marital rights and obligations) and serious lack of this discernment.
3
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

"Gravis defectus discretionis iudicii" (kan. 1095, n. 2 KPK) i "incapacitas assumendi" (kan. 1095, n. 3 KPK) w świetle wyroku Roty Rzymskiej c. Caberletti z 9 lutego 2006 roku

67%
Góralski W.
Ius Matrimoniale
|
2011
|
vol. 22
|
issue 16
191-210
EN
La sentenza presentata e commentata dall’autore riguarda la causa Reg. Triveneti seu Vicentina giudicata dal turno rotale (I. Caberletti, ponente, A.B. Bottone, G. Erlebach) in terza istanza dal titolo del difetto grave della discrezione di giudizio (can. 1095, n. 2 CIC) nonchè della incapacità ad assumere gli obblighi essenziali del matrimonio (can. 1095, n. 3 CIC), in cui si dichiara la nullità del matrimonio sia dal primo sia dal secondo titolo.Si tratta di un caso in cui l’attrice era toccata dalla grave immaturità affettiva e dai disturbi del sè (disturbo borderline di personalità scondo D.S.M.), causati dalle esperienze traumatiche vissute durante l’infanzia e l’adolescenza.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.