Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 47

first rewind previous Page / 3 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  incapacity to fulfil conjugal duty
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 3 next fast forward last
1
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Niezdolność do podjęcia istotnych obowiązków małżeńskich w świetle wyroku Roty Rzymskiej c. Erlebach z 23 listopada 2006 roku

100%
Góralski W.
Ius Matrimoniale
|
2011
|
vol. 22
|
issue 16
177-189
EN
L’autore presenta e commenta la sentenza rotale c. Erlebach emanata del 23 novembre 2006 nella quale si dichiara (in seconda istanza) non constare de nullitate riguardo al difetto dell’uso sufficiente dell’intelletto dalla parte della convenuta (can. 1095, n. 1 CIC) e, nello stesso tempo (in terza istanza), constare de nullitate riguardo alla incapacità della stessa convenuta ad assumere gli obblighi essenziali del matrimonio (can. 1095, n. 3 CIC).
2
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Wyrok Sądu Metropolitalnego w Katowicach (c. Sobański) z 28.11.2002 r. z tytułu niezdolności do podjęcia istotnych obowiązków małżeńskich

100%
Sobański R.
Ius Matrimoniale
|
2003
|
vol. 14
|
issue 8
221-230
EN
Si presenta la sentenza (pro nullitale) del suddetto Tribunale emanata il 28 novembre 2002.
3
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Niezdolność do podjęcia istotnych obowiązków małżeńskich z przyczyn natury psychicznej (kan. 1095, n. 3 KPK) w świetle wyroku Roty Rzymskiej c. Stankiewicz z dnia 27 lipca 2010 r.

100%
Góralski W.
Ius Matrimoniale
|
2017
|
vol. 28
|
issue 4
83-107
EN
The author presents and provides a commentary on the judgment of the Roman Rota, passed on 27.07.2010 (in the third instance) by a panel of auditors coram Stankiewicz in a nullitatis matrimonii case on account on a man’s inability to take up significant conjugal obligations as a result of mental problems (in the first instance a judgment declaring the marriage null and void had been passed, but it was reversed in the second instance); the marriage between the parties, which produced a child, lasted almost eight years.The obtained evidence (testimonies of parties and witnesses, two opinions of experts, obtained in the first and third instance) enabled judges of the third instance to assume that the man’s (the defendant’s) inability to take up significant conjugal obligations has not been proven. It has been concluded that his passivity and dependence on his parents was not pathological in nature.
4
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Wyrok Sądu Metropolitalnego w Katowicach (c. Sobański) z 9.12.1997 r. z tytułu niezdolności do podjęcia istotnych obowiązków małżeńskich

100%
Sobański) R.
Ius Matrimoniale
|
1999
|
vol. 10
|
issue 4
265-271
5
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Wyrok Sądu Metropolitalnego w Katowicach (c. Sobański) z 25.11.1998 r. z tytułu niezdolności do podjęcia istotnych obowiązków małżeńskich

100%
Sobański R.
Ius Matrimoniale
|
1999
|
vol. 10
|
issue 4
273-283
6
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Wyrok Sądu Metropolitalnego w Katowicach (c. Sobański) z 10.07.2009 z tytułu niezdolności pozwanej do podjęcia istotnych obowiązków małżeńskich

100%
Sobański R.
Ius Matrimoniale
|
2010
|
vol. 21
|
issue 15
199-211
7
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Wyrok Sądu Metropolitalnego w Katowicach (c. Sobański) z 4.7.2003 : niezdolność do podjęcia istotnych obowiązków małżeńskich

100%
Sobański R.
Ius Matrimoniale
|
2004
|
vol. 15
|
issue 9
223-230
8
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Niezdolność do podjęcia istotnych obowiązków małżeńskich (próba analizy kan. 1095, n. 3)

84%
Góralski W.
Ius Matrimoniale
|
1990
|
vol. 1
58-93
EN
Il can. 1095, n. 3 prevede che coloro che per cause di natura psichica non possono assumere gli obblighi essenziali del matrimonio, sono incapaci di contrarre matrimonio. È stata infatti la giurisprudenza postconciliare della Rota Romana a delineare, nell'ambito della più generale incapacità al consenso matrimoniale, questa figura di deifetto di consenso che presenta aspetti del tutto peculiari. Dopo aver indicato gli obblighi essenziali matrimoniali (rispetto al "bonum prolis", al "bonum coniugum" al "bonum fidei" e al "bonum sacramenti") l'autore si occupa delle cause della incapacità, delle "proprietà" di essa (l'incapacità grave, antecedente, perpetua, assoluta - alcune questioni tuttavia sono dubbie), del ruolo dei periti nei processi matrimoniali "ob incapacitatem ex can. 1095, n. 3" e del carattere del titolo di nullità, previsto nel canone.
9
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Wyrok Sądu Metropolitalnego w Katowicach (c. Sobański) z 24 czerwca 2010 roku z tytułu niezdolności kobiety oraz/lub mężczyzny do podjęcia istotnych obowiązków małżeńskich

84%
Sobański R.
Ius Matrimoniale
|
2011
|
vol. 22
|
issue 16
243-247
10
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Wyrok Sądu Metropolitalnego w Katowicach (c. Sobański) z 21.12.2004 z tytułu niezdolności pozwanej do podjęcia i wypełnienia istotnych obowiązków małżeńskich

84%
Sobański R.
Ius Matrimoniale
|
2005
|
vol. 16
|
issue 10
217-220
11
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Wyrok Sądu Metropolitalnego w Katowicach (c. Sobański) z 21.12.2004 z tytułu niezdolności pozwanej do podjęcia istotnych obowiązków małżeńskich

84%
Sobański R.
Ius Matrimoniale
|
2005
|
vol. 16
|
issue 10
221-226
12
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Wyrok Sądu Metropolitalnego w Katowicach (c. Sobański) z 21.12.2004 z tytułu niezdolności powódki do podjęcia istotnych obowiązków małżeńskich

84%
Sobański R.
Ius Matrimoniale
|
2005
|
vol. 16
|
issue 10
227-230
13
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Wyrok Sądu Metropolitalnego w Katowicach (c. Sobański) z 10.07.2003 z tytułu niezdolności jednej i drugiej strony do podjęcia i wypełnienia istotnych obowiązków małżeńskich

84%
Sobański R.
Ius Matrimoniale
|
2005
|
vol. 16
|
issue 10
231-234
14
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Wyrok Sądu Metropolitalnego w Katowicach (c. Sobański) z 21.12.2007 r. z tytułu niezdolności pozwanej do podjęcia istotnych obowiązków małżeńskich

84%
Sobański R.
Ius Matrimoniale
|
2008
|
vol. 19
|
issue 13
209-213
15
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Wyrok Sądu Metropolitalnego w Katowicach (c. Sobański) z 12.12.2007 r. z tytułu niezdolności pozwanego oraz/lub powódki do podjęcia istotnych obowiązków małżeńskich

84%
Sobański R.
Ius Matrimoniale
|
2008
|
vol. 19
|
issue 13
215-219
16
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Wyrok Sądu Metropolitalnego w Katowicach (c. Sobański) z 14.12.2006 r. z tytułu niezdolności pozwanego do podjęcia istotnych obowiązków małżeńskich

84%
Sobański R.
Ius Matrimoniale
|
2008
|
vol. 19
|
issue 13
193-199
17
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Wyrok Sądu Metropolitalnego w Katowicach (c. Sobański) z 22.12.2006 r. z tytułu niezdolności pozwanego oraz/lub powódki do podjęcia istotnych obowiązków małżeńskich

84%
Sobański R.
Ius Matrimoniale
|
2008
|
vol. 19
|
issue 13
201-208
18
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Niezdolność do podjęcia istotnych obowiązków małżeńskich dotyczących "bonum coniugum" w świetle wyroku Roty Rzymskiej c. Burke z 26 listopada 1992 roku

84%
Góralski W.
Ius Matrimoniale
|
2010
|
vol. 21
|
issue 15
155-170
EN
Il turno rotale (C. Burke, ponente; T. G. Doran; K. E. Boccafolla) – in qualità del Tribunale di III istanza – ha riconosciuto la causa Armachana nullitatis matrimonii, emanando il 26 novembre del 1992 la sentenza (positiva) dal titolo della incapacità di assumere gli obblighi matrimoniali essenziali (riguardo al bonum coniugum) dalla parte del convenuto.La sentenza c. Burke, presentata e commentata dall’autore, contiene (nella parte in iure) un discorso molto interessante ed originale sul bonum coniugum, sul dolo e sulla incapacità.
19
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Wyrok Sądu Metropolitalnego w Katowicach (c. Sobański) z 06.07.2009 z tytułu niezdolności pozwanego do podjęcia istotnych obowiązków małżeńskich

84%
Sobański R.
Ius Matrimoniale
|
2010
|
vol. 21
|
issue 15
213-216
20
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Stwardnienie rozsiane a zdolność do podjęcia istotnych obowiązków małżeńskich

84%
Sztychmiler R., Fryc J. C., Drelich B.
Ius Matrimoniale
|
1997
|
vol. 8
|
issue 2
9-38
EN
The results of clinical research indicates that multiple sclerosis is a neurological disease of the central nervous system. As a disease which directly affects brain cells, it may cause severe psychological and physiological dysfunctions in some of its victims. The principal psychological effects consist of cognitive and affective disturbances. Among cognitive deficites are memory loss and severe difficulty in conceptual reasoning. These deficits are likely to deprive the person affected by the disease of the ability to understand, reason, and elicit deliberate choice. Severe emotional disturbance indicative of a substantial change in personality. Such a change in personality may incapacitate multiple sclerosis victims in several aspects of their intrapsychic and interpersonal life. In marital relationship, a person may be rendered incapable of fulfilling the essential obligations of marriage. The physiological effects which have important juridic consequences are in the area of sexual dysfunctions. If these effects are present at the time of exchanging consent, a marriage court may have to look for possible functional impotence. If the dysfunction becomes evident after the marriage, the only approach seems to be to investigate the possibility of incapacity to assume the perpetuity of the right to sexual intercourse. If this approach is adopted, the basis for this incapacity is to be found in c. 1095, 3°, which requires that the cause of incapacity to assume the essential obligations of marriage be „psychic” in nature. The fact that someone has been diagnosed as having multiple sclerosis does not constitute definitive basis for the juridic conclusion that such a person is inept for or incapable of contracting marriage. The disease affects each person differently and, hence, interpatient variability with regard to physiological effects is inevitable. Therefore, all patients cannot be regarded as lacking in discretion of judgement and/or in their capacity to assume the essential obligations of marriage. Each case is unique and, therefore, each case must be investigated under an appropriate caput or capita nullitatis according to its particular circumstances.
first rewind previous Page / 3 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.