Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 6

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  interpretant
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Scotland with a Pinch of Westeros? The Case of Justin Kurzel’s Macbeth

100%
Agnieszka P.
Anglica. An International Journal of English Studies
|
2020
|
issue 29/3
135-143
EN
The paper discusses the resemblance between Shakespeare’s play Macbeth and its cinematic adaptation directed by Justin Kurzel (2015) with respect to the image of Scotland in the geographical and historical sense. To this end, tools derived from translation studies are employed, such as the notion of intersemiotic translation, interpretive resemblance and interpretants. It is argued that alterations introduced in the adaptation are motivated by psychological reality and coherence of the plot, making the representation of medieval Scotland believable. In this respect, Kurzel’s production differs from many other cinematic versions of Macbeth, exploiting mostly the universality of the crime and madness motifs.
2
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Wykładnik intertekstualny, interpretant i znaczeniowa gra — klucze do interpretacji muzyki Pawła Szymańskiego

86%
Kostka V.
Aspekty Muzyki
|
2017
|
vol. 7
119-140
EN
This paper concerns the interpretation of Paweł Szymański’s music. Using the theories by Michael Riffaterre and Ryszard Nycz, the author states that three categories are necessary to explain at least a part of his music. (1) The intertextual exponent is the material which finds its way from the intertext to the new text. In Szymański’s music it has two levels: the first is the structure which constitutes a historical invariant, while the second one is the same structure after transformations. In turn, (2) the interpretant is a set of rules which enable the transformation of the intertextual exponent of the first level into a new fragment of text or into an entire text. The main subject of the research is (3) the complete basic text, where the main point is to grasp the general sense, which takes into consideration the intertextual play and is constructed on the basis of autonom-ous and designative meanings. In order to prove the practical aspect of the above-mentioned method, the author has attached the interpretation of the first movement of A Kaleidoscope for M.C.E. for cello (1989). Thanks to the algorithmic character of the selected composition, it is known that the intertextual exponent of the first level is a “truncated”, single-theme, three-part fugue in D-minor, in the style of J.S. Bach. The interpretant is divided into factors of the following three types: (1) extending the pre-composition structure, (2) transforming the extended structure and (3) ornamental. Taking into consideration all the meanings which manifest themselves on the surface of the composition, the author concludes that the work is a musical kaleidoscope, in which the role of coloured pieces of glass is played by the baroque fugue, while the changing configurations of the fragmented baroque and contemporary meanings play the role of kaleidoscopic effects.
3
Content available remote

Embodiment of the Interpretant in a Sign: Reconsider the Concept of a Sign as a Factor of Social Construction in the Frame of Embodied and Disembodied Mind

81%
Kovchak V.
Studia Warmińskie
|
2017
|
issue 54
79-91
PL
Jako mechanizm mediacji oraz tworzenia „integralności”, rzeczywistość społeczna semiotycznie jest skonstruowana przez znak i relacje znakowe. Rzeczywistość społeczna znajduje się w ciągłym procesie twórczym dynamicznych zmian. Zapewnia ją interpretacja intelektualna mechanizmu, realny świat, istnienie innego, znak, znakowe relacje, z pomocą których człowiek odsłania sens swego istnienia i włącza się do ogólnego projektowania rzeczywistości społecznej. Dynamiczny ruch od myśli do wiedzy, postrzegania, przyjemności życia codziennego odbywa się poprzez interpretację jako komunikatywny i semiotyczny proces wyszukiwania i zaangażowania społeczeństwa jako całości. Historycznie najważniejszymi modelami znaku i mediacji znakowej są znakowe modele F. de Saussure’a i C.S. Peirce’a. Te znakowe modele przez długi czas były krytykowe, ale mimo tego wciąż pozostają podstawą socjosemiotycznego mechanizmu mediacji między podmiotem a przedmiotem wiedzy i projektowania rzeczywistości społecznej. Po opublikowaniu książki Charlesa Taylora Źródła współczesnej tożsamości koncepcja F. de Saussure’a i C.S. Peirce’a nabrała wyjątkowego znaczenia, wyjaśniając wiele ukrytych mechanizmów semiotycznego projektowania rzeczywistości społecznej. Otwarty umysł, który jest głównym procesem semiozy, odgrywa ważną rolę w projektowaniu rzeczywistości społecznej. Chodzi o to, że myślenie ukierunkowane jest na projektowanie nowego obiektu, a interpretant – na budowę nowego tłumacza. Przy czym projektowanie obiektu jest procesem obwodowym, tzn. jest nośnikiem wartości społecznej i „całościowo” angażuje społeczeństwo. Ponadto dany obiekt jest zawsze nośnikiem określonych treści, w których zakorzenione są procesy intelektualne twórcy i odbiorcy określonego znaku odnoszącego się do tegoż obiektu. Zatem interpretant danego znaku zawsze potrzebuje współpracy z tłumaczem, który wstępnie objaśni mu poszczególne konteksty, w których poszczególne znaki w określonym społeczeństwie funkcjonują, oznaczając dane obiekty.
EN
Social reality is semiotically constructed through a sign and sign relations as the mechanism of mediation and creation of “being together”. Social reality is in a constant creative process of dynamic change. It is provided by an intellectual interpretation of the mechanism itself, the real world, the being of other, signs and sign relations, through which a person finds the meaning of his/her being and is included in the overall construction of social reality. Therefore, the dynamic movement of thought to knowledge, to sense, to the joy of everyday life is made through an interpretation as a communicative and semiotic process of searching and involving the general community to another being. Historically, the most important models of signs and sign mediation is the sign model by F. de Saussure and Ch.S. Peirce. These models have long been criticized, but remained fundamental in the socio-semiotic mechanism of mediation between subject and object of knowledge and the construction of social reality. Following the publication of Ch. Taylor’s book “Sources of the self”, the concept of F. de Saussure and Ch.S. Peirce clearly gained social significance, in light of which many hidden mechanisms of semiotic construction of social reality become clear. Open-mindedness, which is the core process of semiosis, has a great importance for the construction of social reality. Basically, thinking is directed at the construction of a new body, the interpretant is directed at constructing a new interpreter. Of course, the construction of the body and physicality is not core one, but a peripheral process. However, it is not devoid of social value and also has potential in the construction of social community “being together”. Intelligent processes are rooted in the daily functioning of the body as their carrier, and the interpretant therefore provides an essential concrete interpreter. If the interpretant aimed against the interpreter as its carrier, then the question arises about “mechanism of truth” of the interpretant.
4

Struggle of a description: Peirce and his late semiotics

72%
Švantner M.
Human Affairs
|
2014
|
vol. 24
|
issue 2
204-214
EN
The paper deals with the problem of Peirce’s theory of signs, placing it within the context of modern semiotics (comparing it with Saussurean semiology, in particular), and considers Peirce’s semiotics from the point of view of his theory of categories (phaneroscopy) and in the terms of his classification of signs. The article emphasizes the complicated system of Peirce’s late, “mature”, semeiotic and his theory (classification) of Interpretant.
5
Content available remote

Dimensions of Context. Classifying Approaches to the Context of Communication

58%
Allwood J., Ahlsén E.
Filozofia i nauka. Studia filozoficzne i interdyscyplinarne
|
2019
|
vol. 7/1
77-90
EN
This paper analyzes the concept of context with a special focus on the context of communication. We suggest two ways of classifying approaches to the context of communication: (i) classifying approaches based on a number of relevant dimensions for analyzing context in social activities, (ii) classifying approaches, based on the dimensions of Peirce’s semiotics. We also discuss the use of collected corpora of language, especially multimodal corpora of spoken interaction, as an aid in studying context. Finally, building on the two ways of classifying approaches to the context of communication, we present our own proposal for how to analyze the main relevant contextual dimensions influencing human interaction and communication
6
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Dimensions of Context. Classifying Approaches to the Context of Communication

58%
Allwood J., Ahlsén E.
Filozofia i Nauka
|
2019
|
vol. 7
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.