Search results

1

L’etica nei procedimenti giudiziari

100%

Indellicato M.

Zeszyty Naukowe KUL

|

2017

|

vol. 60

|

issue 3

201-208

EN

Ethics in judicial proceedings is a topic of considerable interest that has always sparked debate at the cultural level in general and at the ethical – legal level in particular. Ethics and law are not on different levels, but are interconnected. Judicial proceedings and all those involved in law enforcement cannot be separated from this interconnection and must be impartial, otherwise they undermine the dignity of a legal person and his fundamental rights, such as the right to truth, loyalty, justice, and a democratic and civil cohabitation for an orderly social life.

PL

L’etica nei procedimenti giudiziari è una tematica di rilevante interesse che da sempre ha acceso il dibattito a livello culturale in generale e a livello etico – giuridico in particolare. Etica e diritto non sono su due piani differenti, bensì sono interconnessi. I procedimenti giudiziari, e gli operatori di diritto in esso coinvolti, non possono prescindere da questa interconnessione e devono essere imparziali, altrimenti ledono la dignità della persona e i suoi diritti fondamentali, come ad esempio il diritto alla verità, alla lealtà, alla giustizia, ad una convivenza democratica e civile per un’ordinata vita sociale e di relazione.

2

Votum separatum w prawie kanonicznym i prawie polskim

100%

Pankiewicz R.

Kościół i Prawo

|

2016

|

issue 5 (18) nr 2

107-126

PL

W artykule opisano zagadnienie dotyczące votum separatum w prawie kanonicznym i prawie polskim. W zakresie prawa kanonicznego analizie poddany został Kodeks Prawa Kanonicznego z 1983 r. oraz instrukcja procesowa Dignitas connubii, a także Kodeks Kanonów Kościołów Wschodnich. Badanie votum separatum w prawie polskim w szczególności objęło akty normatywne ustawowe i wykonawcze oraz orzecznictwo sądowe. Uwzględniona została także podstawowa literatura przedmiotu. We wstępie artykułu zdefiniowano pojęcie votum separatum, które jest szczególnym uprawnieniem przegłosowanego sędziego składu kolegialnego, który nie godząc się z wydanym orzeczeniem (rozstrzygnięciem, uzasadnieniem) zaznacza swoje odmienne stanowisko. Zdanie odrębne uregulowane jest w prawie kanonicznym i prawie polskim, jednakże mimo zasadniczego podobieństwa tej czynności procesowej w analizowanych porządkach prawnych występują również znaczne różnice. Zgodnie z wolą ustawodawcy kodeksowego, w prawie kanonicznym votum separatum jest wewnętrzną czynnością procesową, o której strony procesu nie są informowane. W prawie polskim niezależnie od rodzaju procesu czynność ta jest jawna. Podkreślenia wymaga fakt, że votum separatum jest jedyną czynnością procesową, która jest „wyłomem” w tajemnicy wyrokowania. Ponadto, trzeba stwierdzić, iż jest atrybutem niezależności sędziego w podejmowaniu rozstrzygnięcia w danej sprawie. Należy także zwrócić uwagę na to, że w prawie kanonicznym każdy sędzia składu kolegialnego jest zobowiązany przygotować swoje wotum wraz z uzasadnieniem prawnym i faktycznym na piśmie. Jednakże od niego zależy, czy na etapie wyrokowania odstąpi od swojego wotum, czy też nie, co w konsekwencji prowadzi do genezy votum separatum.

EN

The article discusses the question of the votum separatum in canon law and Polish law. In the field of canon law analysis has been subjected to the 1983 Code of Canon Law and instruction process Dignitas connubii and the Code of Canons of the Eastern Churches. Research votum separatum in Polish law, in particular, covered the normative acts and court rulings. The basic literature was taken into account. In the introduction, the article was defined the concept of votum separatum, which is the special privilege outvoted judge the composition of the collegiate, which is not accepting the issued the judgment (verdict, the justification) selects their different position. Dissenting opinion is described in canon law and Polish law, however, despite the essential similarity are of the procedural step in the analyzed legal systems there are also significant differences. According to the intention of the legislature dipped in canon law votum separatum is an internal action process, by which the parties are not informed of the process. The Polish law, regardless of the type of process operation is evident. It should be stressed that the votum separatum is the only activity process, which is an exception to the mystery of adjudication. In addition, it must be stated that it is an attribute of independence of the judge in taking decision in the case. Belongs also pay attention that in canon law any judge composition of the collegiate is obliged to prepare their a votive offering with reasons the legal and factual in writing. From him, however, it depends on whether at the stage of adjudication depart from its a votive offering or not, which consequently leads to the genesis of votum separatum.

3

Odpowiedzialność biskupa diecezjalnego w procesie sądowym małżeńskim po ogłoszeniu motu proprio Mitis Iudex papieża Franciszka

80%

Malecha P.

Ius Matrimoniale

|

2016

|

vol. 27

|

issue 3

5-33

EN

In his motu proprio Apostolic Letter Mitis Iudex, Pope Francis underscores the role and responsibility of every Diocesan Bishop in the pastoral exercise of canonical justice and points out what must be done in the carrying out of the bishop’s own judicial power. The goal of this study is to bring together the teaching of the Pope and of the Church on the responsibility of the Diocesan Bishop in causes of marriage nullity. The question under study is not only presented in light of Mitis Iudex, but also takes into consideration other documents of the Holy See, especially those of the Apostolic Signatura, which sees to the correct administration of justice in the Church. For this reason the presentation of the topic is broader than its treatment in Mitis Iudex, and as a consequence it seeks a more comprehensive handling of the question at hand, naturally within the limits of such an article. In the first part of the study, questions of a doctrinal nature are dealt with, revealing, above all, that each Diocesan Bishop is the iudex natus of his own diocese. Therefore, he has not only the right, but also the duty – both of which have their origin in divine law – to judge coram Domino the cases of his faithful. In the next part, these rights and duties are presented, which then leads to an examination of the responsibility of the Diocesan Bishop in causes of marriage nullity. In the wake of the recent reforms – especially the elimination of the obligation to have a double conforming sentence and the introduction of the processus brevior – the responsibilities of the Diocesan Bishop are significantly amplified. In fact, in the pastoral exercise of his own judicial power, he must ensure that no laxism of any sort creeps in and that the truth is the foundation, mother, and law of justice in every aspect of the judicial process.

Refine search results

1 Ius Matrimoniale

1 Kościół i Prawo

1 Zeszyty Naukowe KUL

1 Indellicato M.

1 Malecha P.

1 Pankiewicz R.

1 2017

2 2016

L’etica nei procedimenti giudiziari

Votum separatum w prawie kanonicznym i prawie polskim

Odpowiedzialność biskupa diecezjalnego w procesie sądowym małżeńskim po ogłoszeniu motu proprio Mitis Iudex papieża Franciszka