Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 8

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  kanon 1095, n. 2 KPK
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Poważny brak rozeznania oceniającego (kan. 1095, n. 2 KPK) w wyroku Roty Rzymskiej c. Mckay z 14.10.2004 r.

100%
Góralski W.
Ius Matrimoniale
|
2014
|
vol. 25
|
issue 1
107-114
EN
In the Lafayetten. case regarding a declaration of the marriage (which lasted 25 years) due to gravis defectus discretionis iudicii of both parties, the judgment declaring the marriage invalidity was issued in the first instance (the lack of discernment of the spouses was declared). After the appeal brought by the defendant (the woman) to the Roman Rota the case was examined (by tumus c. McKay) in the ordinary proceedings and resulted in the negative judgment, thus, the invalidity of the challenged marriage was not proved. The judgment of the Roman Rota is an example of a thorough evaluation of evidence, and the critical valuation of experts’ opinion in particular.
2
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Poważny brak rozeznania oceniającego (kan. 1095, n. 2) w wyroku Roty Rzymskiej „pro vinculo” z 26 VI 1984 r. c. Huot

100%
Góralski W.
Ius Matrimoniale
|
1992
|
vol. 3
80-88
EN
Il turno rotale (D.M. Huot, ponente, E.M. Egan, A. Stankiewicz) il 26 giugno 1984 ha emanato la sentenza con la quale è stata infirmata la decisione del tribunale metropolitano di New York dichiarante la nullità del matrimonio J.A. - A.J. dal titolo del grave difetto della discrezione di giudizio dal attore.L’autore presenta e commenta la suddetta sentenza del tribunale della Rota Romana esponendo i momenti più importanti sia della parte „in iure”, sia di quella „in facto”.
3
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Poważny brak rozeznania oceniającego co do istotnych praw i obowiązków małżeńskich a nieważność małżeństwa (kan. 1095, n. 2)

67%
Góralski W.
Ius Matrimoniale
|
1990
|
vol. 1
33-57
EN
Nel contrarre matrimonio non basta il semplice uso della ragione ma occorre "sufficiens discretio iudicii" seu "iudicii maturitas contractui proportionata" (Gasparri). Il grado di "discretio" sufficiente e necessario per poter contrarre validamente si detentiina in riferimento ai diritti ed obblighi essenziali che si debbono scambievolmente dare e ricevere nel porre in essere il matrimonio. La "discretion iudicii"non e che la capacità di intendere e di volere il matrimonio, e quindi di "eligere e deliberare" liberamente di porre in essere quest'atto. Il "defectus discretionis iudicii" pub essere causato delle nevrosi (neurastenia, psicastenia, isteria) o dalle psicopatie (nelle sue diverse forme). La giurisprudenza rotale ha sempre considerato che soltanto la nevrosi o la psicopatia grave pub impedire la "discretio iudicii" proporzionata al matrimonio. Tra le prove della mancanza della "discretio iudicii" un ruolo molto omportante si deve attribuire alle "peritio iudicia- lis" con la quale tuttavia il giudice non può essere determinato.
4
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

"Gravis defectus discretionis iudicii" (kan. 1095, n. 2 KPK) i "incapacitas assumendi" (kan. 1095, n. 3 KPK) w świetle wyroku Roty Rzymskiej c. Caberletti z 9 lutego 2006 roku

67%
Góralski W.
Ius Matrimoniale
|
2011
|
vol. 22
|
issue 16
191-210
EN
La sentenza presentata e commentata dall’autore riguarda la causa Reg. Triveneti seu Vicentina giudicata dal turno rotale (I. Caberletti, ponente, A.B. Bottone, G. Erlebach) in terza istanza dal titolo del difetto grave della discrezione di giudizio (can. 1095, n. 2 CIC) nonchè della incapacità ad assumere gli obblighi essenziali del matrimonio (can. 1095, n. 3 CIC), in cui si dichiara la nullità del matrimonio sia dal primo sia dal secondo titolo.Si tratta di un caso in cui l’attrice era toccata dalla grave immaturità affettiva e dai disturbi del sè (disturbo borderline di personalità scondo D.S.M.), causati dalle esperienze traumatiche vissute durante l’infanzia e l’adolescenza.
5
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Wyrok Sądu Kościelnego we Włocławku (c. Grzęźlikowski) z 13.10.1997 r. w sprawie o nieważność małżeństwa z tytułu poważnego braku rozeznania oceniającego co do istotnych praw i obowiązków małżeńskich (kan. 1095, n. 2 KPK)

67%
Grzęźlikowski c.
Ius Matrimoniale
|
2003
|
vol. 14
|
issue 8
231-241
EN
Plaintiff brought a suit against his matrimony contracted with N. on 22nd of January 1984 in Saint Patrick's Cathedral in Auckland in New Zealand. N. in virtue of lack of judging discernment regarding matrimonial rights and duties on his side (can. 1095, 2 Code of Canonical Proeedings) suggesting that in was caused by fact that being on emigration in New Zealand, missing the country of origin and family, being mentally woebegone and being depressed, he had restricted will and critical cognizance and was not able to have evaluotion of matrimonial agreement subject and its free choice. He also thought that because of arisen situation and due to his individualistic immaturity in moment of contracting the matrimony, he had lack of judging discernment regarding the matrimonial rights and dubes. He lodged a complaint for nullity of marriage to the tribunal of his place of residence in March 1996. Defendant was living in England in that time. Tribunal Włocławek obtained - acco rding to canonic regulations 1673, 4 Code of C nonical Proceedings - a permission to wunduct a case from the tribunal of defendant's place of residence. Hearing of evidence induded hearing of the parties, witnesses and examination of the plaintiff by psychologist expert appointed by the wurt, who issued an opinion. Confronting the legal motives submitted in case with actual real motives, after taking the cognizance of plaintiffs notes after publishing the files of a case and before – sentence notes of the defender of matrimonial union, the board of judges passed a sentence in favour of validity of appealed marriage. It was found that: 1. plaintiff could be really actually mentally depressed, emotionally trembling, he missed his country and family, however that state was not as strong and serious to make him not to realize the fact of what the marriage was; 2. facts that he left Poland by himself and chose emigration by himself indicate that he was self-dependent and individualistically mature; 3. lack of discernment was not confirmed by testimonies of defendant and witnesses as well as circumstances of marriage contracting, its course and actual reasons of marriage breakdown; 4. expert appointed by the court found the plaintiff individualistically mature and found no reasons that would cause the plaintiff to have of ability of due judgment of what the matrimony is and which obligations it put him under as well as ability to express matrimonial consent; 5. plaintifs cognitive and volitive powers were able to evaluate correctly the resulted situation, correctly express matrimonial consent and express matrimonial consent in correct and volid way. Second Instance Tribunal from Gniezno confirmal a sentence of Tribunal form Włocławek suggesting the plaintiff to possibly lodge a complaint for nullity of marriage in virtue of simulation of matrimonial condent on his side.
6
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Nieważność małżeństwa z tytułu poważnego braku rozeznania oceniającego z powodu toksykomanii u obojga stron (kan. 1095, n. 2) w wyroku Roty Rzymskiej z 23 II 1990 r. c. Stankiewicz

67%
Góralski W.
Ius Matrimoniale
|
1992
|
vol. 3
89-103
EN
L’autore presenta la sentenza definitiva pronunciata il 23 febbraio 1990 nel terzo grado della giurisdizione, cioè nel Tribunale della Rota Romana c. Stankiewicz dal titolo dell’incapacità di ambedue parti a prestere il consenso matrimoniale „ob defectum discretionis iudicii (can. 1095, n. 2) propter toxicomaniam”. Con la suddetta sentenza viene dichiarata la nullità del matrimonio contratto il 10 maggio 1973 nella chiesa parrocchiale della Immacolata Concezione in Buenos Aires.
7
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Poważny brak rozeznania oceniającego (kan. 1095, n. 2 KPK) u powoda i wykluczenie przezeń nierozerwalności małżeństwa (kan. 1101 § 2 KPK) w wyroku Roty Rzymskiej c. Erlebach z 21.07.2016 r.

59%
Góralski W.
Ius Matrimoniale
|
2017
|
vol. 28
|
issue 2
107-145
EN
This case concerns a marriage concluded on 13 June 1987 in St. Nichola’s Church San Gemini in Interamnen.-Narnien.-Amerinae diocese, between a 37-years-old Paulus and 27-years-old Maria, who split up several years later.On 22 December 2009 Paulus launched an action for annulment of his marriage before the Tribunal of First Instance, providing exclusion of the indissolubility of marriage and later also lack of discretion of judgement on his side as reasons. On 28 October 2011, the Tribunal passed a pro vincula sentence in both reasons for annulment and the complainant immediately appealed to the Roman Rota.Turnus of the Rota c. Erlebach heard the case in the second instance and, on 21 July 2016, issued a decree of nullity of marriage because of both reasons. When it comes to the lack of discretion of judgement, the complainant’s lack of internal freedom (pathological jealousy and constant fear as well as dependence on his mother) has been observed. When proving the exclusion of the inseparability of marriage, the Tribunal drew attention both to the complainant’s testimony (judicial and non-judicial ones) as well as reasons for simulation and circumstances. The extensive sentences c. Erlebach is of great significance since it indicates the compatibility of two of the above mentioned reasons for nullity: defectus discretionis iudicii and simulatio consensus.
8
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Błąd co do przymiotu osoby (kan. 1097 § 2 KPK), brak rozeznania oceniającego (kan. 1095, n. 2) i niezdolność do podjęcia istotnych obowiązków małżeńskich (kan. 1095. n. 3 KPK) w świetle wyroku Roty Rzymskiej c. De Angelis z 16 czerwca 2006 roku

51%
Góralski W.
Ius Matrimoniale
|
2012
|
vol. 23
|
issue 17
139-159
EN
L’autore presenta e commenta la sentenza della Rota Romana c. De Angelis nella causa Reg. Apuli seu Baren. Nullitatis matrimonii del 16 giugno 2006, giudicata dai cinque titoli di invalidità, tra i quali i due sono stati introdotti dopo l’appello dalla sentenza della prima istanza. Nella sua sentenza il turno rotale ha pronunciato – come tribunale di prima istanza –l’invalidità del matrimonio solo dal titolo l’incapacitas assumendi dalla parte dell’attore.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.