Search results

1

Problematyka małżeństw mieszanych w kontekście wypełniania istotnych praw-obowiązków małżeńskich

100%

Gierat K.

Ius Matrimoniale

|

2000

|

vol. 11

|

issue 5

63-101

EN

Wenn die Eltern im Glauben geteilt sind, so kann die einzige vernünftige Lösung ausschließlich in der Erziehung aller Kinder im Sinne bloß des einen oder bzw. des anderen einzigen Glauben liegen. Schmerzhafte Frage dabei ist, welche von dieser Religionen überwiegen soll? Antwort auf diese Frage, welche die Katholische Kirche mit einer autoritativen Aussage und Rechtmäßigkeit tut, ist die, daß alle Kinder in der Katholischen Kirche getauft und erzogen werden sollen. In der Praxis verbindet sich dies oft mit ernsten Problemen, die sowohl seitens der Eltern, wie auch ihrer Kinder in Erfahrung gebracht werden. Ob jedenfalls die Katholische Kirche tatsächlich anders verfahren kann, ohne gleichzeitig den Glauben an sich zu verlieren, sowie ohne Verneinung ihrer eigenen Persönlichkeit?

2

Poważny brak rozeznania oceniającego co do istotnych praw i obowiązków małżeńskich a nieważność małżeństwa (kan. 1095, n. 2)

80%

Góralski W.

Ius Matrimoniale

|

1990

|

vol. 1

33-57

EN

Nel contrarre matrimonio non basta il semplice uso della ragione ma occorre "sufficiens discretio iudicii" seu "iudicii maturitas contractui proportionata" (Gasparri). Il grado di "discretio" sufficiente e necessario per poter contrarre validamente si detentiina in riferimento ai diritti ed obblighi essenziali che si debbono scambievolmente dare e ricevere nel porre in essere il matrimonio. La "discretion iudicii"non e che la capacità di intendere e di volere il matrimonio, e quindi di "eligere e deliberare" liberamente di porre in essere quest'atto. Il "defectus discretionis iudicii" pub essere causato delle nevrosi (neurastenia, psicastenia, isteria) o dalle psicopatie (nelle sue diverse forme). La giurisprudenza rotale ha sempre considerato che soltanto la nevrosi o la psicopatia grave pub impedire la "discretio iudicii" proporzionata al matrimonio. Tra le prove della mancanza della "discretio iudicii" un ruolo molto omportante si deve attribuire alle "peritio iudicia- lis" con la quale tuttavia il giudice non può essere determinato.

3

Wyrok Sądu Kościelnego we Włocławku (c. Grzęźlikowski) z 13.10.1997 r. w sprawie o nieważność małżeństwa z tytułu poważnego braku rozeznania oceniającego co do istotnych praw i obowiązków małżeńskich (kan. 1095, n. 2 KPK)

80%

Grzęźlikowski c.

Ius Matrimoniale

|

2003

|

vol. 14

|

issue 8

231-241

EN

Plaintiff brought a suit against his matrimony contracted with N. on 22nd of January 1984 in Saint Patrick's Cathedral in Auckland in New Zealand. N. in virtue of lack of judging discernment regarding matrimonial rights and duties on his side (can. 1095, 2 Code of Canonical Proeedings) suggesting that in was caused by fact that being on emigration in New Zealand, missing the country of origin and family, being mentally woebegone and being depressed, he had restricted will and critical cognizance and was not able to have evaluotion of matrimonial agreement subject and its free choice. He also thought that because of arisen situation and due to his individualistic immaturity in moment of contracting the matrimony, he had lack of judging discernment regarding the matrimonial rights and dubes. He lodged a complaint for nullity of marriage to the tribunal of his place of residence in March 1996. Defendant was living in England in that time. Tribunal Włocławek obtained - acco rding to canonic regulations 1673, 4 Code of C nonical Proceedings - a permission to wunduct a case from the tribunal of defendant's place of residence. Hearing of evidence induded hearing of the parties, witnesses and examination of the plaintiff by psychologist expert appointed by the wurt, who issued an opinion. Confronting the legal motives submitted in case with actual real motives, after taking the cognizance of plaintiffs notes after publishing the files of a case and before – sentence notes of the defender of matrimonial union, the board of judges passed a sentence in favour of validity of appealed marriage. It was found that: 1. plaintiff could be really actually mentally depressed, emotionally trembling, he missed his country and family, however that state was not as strong and serious to make him not to realize the fact of what the marriage was; 2. facts that he left Poland by himself and chose emigration by himself indicate that he was self-dependent and individualistically mature; 3. lack of discernment was not confirmed by testimonies of defendant and witnesses as well as circumstances of marriage contracting, its course and actual reasons of marriage breakdown; 4. expert appointed by the court found the plaintiff individualistically mature and found no reasons that would cause the plaintiff to have of ability of due judgment of what the matrimony is and which obligations it put him under as well as ability to express matrimonial consent; 5. plaintifs cognitive and volitive powers were able to evaluate correctly the resulted situation, correctly express matrimonial consent and express matrimonial consent in correct and volid way. Second Instance Tribunal from Gniezno confirmal a sentence of Tribunal form Włocławek suggesting the plaintiff to possibly lodge a complaint for nullity of marriage in virtue of simulation of matrimonial condent on his side.

4

Wpływ ograniczenia wolności wewnętrznej na brak rozeznania oceniającego co do istotnych praw i obowiązków małżeńskich w świetle wyroku Roty Rzymskiej c. Pompedda z 19.5.1994 r.

80%

Dzierżon G.

Ius Matrimoniale

|

2000

|

vol. 11

|

issue 5

217-223

EN

Si trata di una sentenza rotale negativa, emanata dal titolo del can. 1095 n. 2. Il ponente rotale ha concentrato la sua attenzione alla questione di libertà interna dei contraenti. In questo studio si presenta e commenta tutte le parti suddetta sentenza sia „in iure” che „in facto”.

Refine search results

4 Ius Matrimoniale

1 Dzierżon G.

1 Gierat K.

1 Grzęźlikowski c.

1 Góralski W.

1 2003

2 2000

1 1990

Problematyka małżeństw mieszanych w kontekście wypełniania istotnych praw-obowiązków małżeńskich

Poważny brak rozeznania oceniającego co do istotnych praw i obowiązków małżeńskich a nieważność małżeństwa (kan. 1095, n. 2)

Wyrok Sądu Kościelnego we Włocławku (c. Grzęźlikowski) z 13.10.1997 r. w sprawie o nieważność małżeństwa z tytułu poważnego braku rozeznania oceniającego co do istotnych praw i obowiązków małżeńskich (kan. 1095, n. 2 KPK)

Wpływ ograniczenia wolności wewnętrznej na brak rozeznania oceniającego co do istotnych praw i obowiązków małżeńskich w świetle wyroku Roty Rzymskiej c. Pompedda z 19.5.1994 r.