Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 10

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  new creation
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

An ecological perspective in the evolutionary theology

100%
Grygiel W. P.
Studia Philosophiae Christianae
|
2020
|
vol. 56
|
issue 4
277-292
EN
A new paradigm in theology, termed evolutionary theology, supports the understanding of ecology as the proper ordering of the relations between living organisms and their environment. It is argued that evolutionary theology yields a unique conceptual framework in which the human species share a common history with the entire Universe and respecting nature’s integrity means securing a common destiny to everything that exists. This is a powerful motivation for adopting a balanced ecological attitude aimed at respecting nature’s inherent integrity. Furthermore, proposing theological arguments to substantiate ecological claims will help neutralize the objections that religion as such promotes anti-ecological attitudes. Such objections become more pressing when religion focuses exclusively on the afterlife in the immaterial and eternal world to come, and neglects the well-being of the material and temporal Universe.
2
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

The Creation Theme in the Gospel of John

100%
Kubiś A.
Collectanea Theologica
|
2020
|
vol. 90
|
issue 5
375-414
EN
The article surveys recent scholarship on the use of creation imagery in the Gospel of John, with the aim of presenting a rather exhaustive register of possible references. Both the obvious and the less clear-cut allusions to Gen 1–3 are discussed, the main focus being to accumulate and assess the evidence (for or against) all the apparent references to creation imagery. Included in this examination are several unconvincing and even far-fetched proposals advanced by some modern scholars, in order to give the fullest possible picture of the current discourse on these issues. After discussing the creation theme in the Prologue (1:1–18), the article explores the presence of creation imagery in the Book of Signs (1:19–12:50) and the Book of Glory (13:1–21:25).
3
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

The Role of the Holy Spirit during Parousia in the Eschatology of Sergius Bulgakov

72%
Raczyński-Rożek M.
Polonia Sacra
|
2021
|
vol. 25
|
issue 2
EN
In Parousia, Jesus Christ is undoubtedly the central figure. However, since Parousia is the revelation of the glory of the entire Trinity, it is worth asking about the role of the remaining Divine Persons in this event. In the article, the main focus will be on the role of the Holy Spirit and its interpretation in the eschatology of Sergius Bulgakov. According to the Russian theologian, Parousia is a revelation not only of Christ’s glory, but also of the hypostatic Glory of God, i.e. the Holy Spirit, and in this way it’s the final realization of Pentecost.
PL
W paruzji centralną postacią jest niewątpliwie Jezus Chrystus. Skoro jednak paruzja jest objawieniem się chwały całej Trójcy, to warto zadać sobie pytanie o rolę pozostałych Osób Boskich w tym wydarzeniu. W tym artykule główna uwaga zostanie poświęcona roli Ducha Świętego i jej interpretacji w eschatologii Sergiusza Bułgakowa. Według rosyjskiego teologa, paruzja jest objawieniem nie tylko chwały Chrystusa, ale także hipostatycznej Chwały Boga, czyli Ducha Świętego, a w ten sposób ostateczną realizacją Pięćdziesiątnicy.
4
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Rozumienie odkupienia w Encyklice Redemptor hominis

72%
Fac W. M.
Roczniki Teologii Dogmatycznej
|
2009
|
vol. 1
59-64
EN
John Paul II developed a very profound and mystical teaching on redemption, mainly paschal one. Jesus Christ is man's only Redeemer: Redemptor hominis, and through man as the center of all creation He is also the Redeemer of the world: Redemptor mundi. Redemption in its essence is reconciliation of the human person with the Person of God the Father and with the whole Holy Trinity. Redemption on earth is incarnated in Jesus Christ, that is redemption is Jesus Christ, God – Man. It has the character of a personal tie between God's Love and Charity and a loving response from man. Through Love in redemption God creates man anew, so that redemption is in a sense an act of new creation. Owing to this the redeemed man finds his essence in Christ and is fulfilled in Christ in a supreme way. Redemption gives us freedom owing to the revelation of Truth.
5
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Przebaczenie w optyce miłosierdzia

58%
Lekan J.
Teologia w Polsce
|
2016
|
vol. 10
|
issue 2
59-77
EN
Undertaking the problem of forgiveness as something which every man needs from God, it is necessary to look upon it in the perspective of God’s Mercy as one of the elements of the process of salvation. Without doubt, we have to consider a man as the greatest fruit of God’s creation (not forgetting about ontological abyss), invited to friendship with God from the very moment of creation. Also, the original sin and its effects, as well as God’s Mercy revealed in the gift of the Only Son, cannot be forgotten. In Him we reach forgiveness – all of us who ask for it with faith and open heart. This forgiveness is realized in the framework of the New Covenant. It is accessible in the Church both in a regular (sacramental) and an extraordinary way. It leads to the creation of the new heart in us and it enables us to forgive each other in order to build the Civilization of Love. In that way, it reveals the truth that creation and redemption are correlated because redemption does not destroy the work of the Creator but the work of the tempter.
PL
W refleksji nad przebaczeniem widzianym w świetle Bożego miłosierdzia zechcemy, by pójść następującą drogą: Był taki moment w dziejach człowieka, że przebaczenie nie było potrzebne (harmonia stworzenia). Człowiek zburzył tę relację przez złe wykorzystanie swej wolności (grzech pierworodny). Bóg nie pozostawił jednak człowieka samego i wyszedł ku niemu (przebaczenie w Chrystusie). Przebaczenie to jest dostępne (w Kościele) w sposób zwyczajny, sakramentalny (sakrament pokuty i pojednania) i nadzwyczajny (pozasakramentalny). Posiada konkretne skutki antropologiczne (nowy człowiek). Boże przebaczenie jest niezbędne, aby dokonało się przebaczenie w relacjach międzyludzkich (jedno serce).
6
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Przebaczenie w optyce miłosierdzia.

58%
Lekan J.
Teologia w Polsce
|
2016
|
vol. 10
|
issue 2
59-77
PL
W refl eksji nad przebaczeniem widzianym w świetle Bożego miłosierdzia zechcemy pójść następującą drogą: Był taki moment w dziejach człowieka, że przebaczenie nie było potrzebne (harmonia stworzenia). Człowiek zburzył tę relację przez złe wykorzystanie swej wolności (grzech pierworodny). Bóg nie pozostawił jednak człowieka samego i wyszedł ku niemu (przebaczenie w Chrystusie). Przebaczenie to jest dostępne (w Kościele) w sposób zwyczajny, sakramentalny (sakrament pokuty i pojednania) i nadzwyczajny (pozasakramentalny). Posiada konkretne skutki antropologiczne (nowy człowiek). Boże przebaczenie jest niezbędne, aby dokonało się przebaczenie w relacjach międzyludzkich (jedno serce).
EN
Undertaking the problem of forgiveness as something which every man needs from God, it is necessary to look upon it in the perspective of God’s Mercy as one of the elements of the process of salvation. Without doubt, we have to consider a man as the greatest fruit of God’s creation (not forgetting about ontological abyss), invited to friendship with God from the very moment of creation. Also, the original sin and its effects, as well as God’s Mercy revealed in the gift of the Only Son, cannot be forgotten. In Him we reach forgiveness – all of us who ask for it with faith and open heart. This forgiveness is realized in the framework of the New Covenant. It is accessible in the Church both in a regular (sacramental) and an extraordinary way. It leads to the creation of the new heart in us and it enables us to forgive each other in order to build the Civilization of Love.
7
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Teologia Miłosierdzia Bożego

58%
Góźdż K.
Teologia w Polsce
|
2016
|
vol. 10
|
issue 1
5-15
PL
Miłość i miłosierdzie są dwoma wymiarami jednej łaski: miłość Boża stwarza, a miłosierdzie Boże – oczyszcza i doskonali naturę człowieka. Miłosierdzie jest więc warunkiem doprowadzenia człowieka do uczestniczenia w naturze Bożej. Mówiąc krótko: stwarza człowieka miłość, a zbawia miłosierdzie.
EN
God’s Mercy never threatens man’s dignity. It elevates human dignity to the Divine level of “second creation.” This is a kind of “divinization” of man, in which human love is transformed by the Divine mercy into closeness to God. Divine Mercy compensates all human imperfections – not only sins, but all kinds of weakness and limitations of the person’s existence. This is how love and mercy are in the heart of the relationship between God and man. Love and mercy are two aspects of one grace: The grace of Divine Love gives life, while the grace of Divine Mercy purifi es and perfects human nature. Therefore, Divine Mercy is a precondition on human participation in the nature of God. To put it briefl y, man is created through love and saved through mercy.
8
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Teologia miłosierdzia Bożego

58%
Góźdź K.
Teologia w Polsce
|
2016
|
vol. 10
|
issue 1
5-15
EN
God’s Mercy never threatens man’s dignity. It elevates human dignity to the Divine level of “second creation.” This is a kind of “divinization” of man, in which human love is transformed by the Divine mercy into closeness to God. Divine Mercy compensates all human imperfections – not only sins, but all kinds of weakness and limitations of the person’s existence. This is how love and mercy are in the heart of the relationship between God and man. Love and mercy are two aspects of one grace: The grace of Divine Love gives life, while the grace of Divine Mercy purifies and perfects human nature. Therefore, Divine Mercy is a precondition on human participation in the nature of God. To put it briefly, man is created through love and saved through mercy.
PL
Miłość i miłosierdzie są dwoma wymiarami jednej łaski: miłość Boża stwarza, a miłosierdzie Boże – oczyszcza i doskonali naturę człowieka. Miłosierdzie jest więc warunkiem doprowadzenia człowieka do uczestniczenia w naturze Bożej. Mówiąc krótko: stwarza człowieka miłość, a zbawia miłosierdzie.
9
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Duchowość nowego człowieka w perspektywie tajemnicy sakramentu chrztu

51%
Piasecki P.
Teologia i Moralność
|
2015
|
vol. 10
|
issue 1(17)
45-59
EN
Christians can find themselves in the modern world and actively influence their future, fulfilling their vocation only with the foundation in a particular spirituality. It is spirituality which can most generally be denominated ‘baptismal spirituality’. Making use of Paul's dichotomy: the old man and the new man; death and resurrection, a dynamic notion of the new man's spiritually is emerging. It focuses on the novelty of Christ and the new life of which He is the source. The novelty of the life of a baptized is based on a direct, full of excitement yet never satisfied, relation between man and Christ, who is present and active in the Church. The spirituality of the new man is organic because its integrity is multifaceted, as it encompasses the spirituality of: the Cross, the Resurrection, the death and the new life, submission to the Holy Spirit, prayer, and also missionary and anthropological one, as well as it falls within ecclesiology, trinitology, and eschatology. That is why such comprehension of the spirituality of the new man constitutes an innovative contribution to adequate perception of Christian spirituality.
PL
Chrześcijanin może odnaleźć się we współczesnym świecie i aktywnie wpływać na jego przyszłość realizując swoje powołanie tylko w oparciu o określoną duchowość. Najogólniej możemy ją określić jako duchowość chrzcielną. Posługując się pawłową dychotomią: stary i nowy człowiek; śmierć i zmartwychwstanie, wyłania się pełne dynamizmu pojęcie duchowości nowego człowieka. Koncentruje się wokół nowości Chrystusa i nowego życia, którego On jest źródłem. Nowość życia ochrzczonego zasadza się na bezpośredniej, i wciąż budzącej pełen ekscytacji niedosyt relacji, jaka wywiązuje się pomiędzy człowiekiem a Chrystusem, obecnym i działającym w Kościele. Duchowość nowego człowieka jest organiczna, bowiem można mówić o jej integralności w wieloaspektowości. Obejmując duchowość krzyża, zmartwychwstania, śmierci i nowego życia, uległości Duchowi Świętemu, modlitwy, misyjną, antropologiczną oraz włączając się w nurt eklezjologii, trynitologii i eschatologii, dlatego stanowi innowacyjny wkład do właściwego postrzegania duchowości chrześcijańskiej.
10
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Znaczenie pozycji aniołów w grobie Jezusa w J 20,12

44%
Kubiś A.
The Biblical Annals
|
2016
|
vol. 6
|
issue 3
459-493
EN
Compared with the Synoptics, the Johannine angels assume a particular and significant position inside Jesus’ tomb. The evangelist describes it precisely as one angel sitting at the place of Jesus’ head and another at the place of Jesus’ feet. Not all Johannine commentators pay attention to this detail, yet a comparison with the descriptions of the angels’ positions in the different synoptic narratives demonstrates that they all reflect original editorial work on the part of each the evangelist. Consequently, these accounts can – and indeed do – convey particular ideological or theological stances typical of each gospel writer, including John. With regard to John 20:12, the article surveys proposals advanced by several Johannine commentators, beginning with some very obvious and prosaic explanations and ending with the most probable meanings behind the particular posture of Johannine angels. According to a strictly archeological-historical explanation, the position of the Johannine angles is no more than an indication that Jesus’ burial place was not a tomb of kôkîm type. The article also presents allegorical interpretations, from St. Augustine to St. Thomas Aquinas; a religious-cultural exposition referring to the Egyptian goddesses Isis and Nephthys; a few very literal explanations accentuating the physical emptiness between the angels; and an intertextual exposition based on a targumic reading of Isaiah 6. At the end, as the most persuasive solution, the article proposes that the Johannine angels represent the cherubs of the Ark of the Covenant and the mercy seat. This intertextual and symbolic interpretation likewise explains Mary Magdalene’s lack of fear and astonishment in her interaction with supernatural beings.
PL
Compared with the Synoptics, the Johannine angels assume a particular and significant position inside Jesus’ tomb. The evangelist describes it precisely as one angel sitting at the place of Jesus’ head and another at the place of Jesus’ feet. Not all Johannine commentators pay attention to this detail, yet a comparison with the descriptions of the angels’ positions in the different synoptic narratives demonstrates that they all reflect original editorial work on the part of each the evangelist. Consequently, these accounts can – and indeed do – convey particular ideological or theological stances typical of each gospel writer, including John. With regard to John 20,12, the article surveys proposals advanced by several Johannine commentators, beginning with some very obvious and prosaic explanations and ending with the most probable meanings behind the particular posture of Johannine angels. According to a strictly archeological-historical explanation, the position of the Johannine angles is no more than an indication that Jesus’ burial place was not a tomb of kôkîm type. The article also presents allegorical interpretations, from St. Augustine to St. Thomas Aquinas; a religious-cultural exposition referring to the Egyptian goddesses Isis and Nephthys; a few very literal explanations accentuating the physical emptiness between the angels; and an intertextual exposition based on a targumic reading of Isaiah 6. At the end, as the most persuasive solution, the article proposes that the Johannine angels represent the cherubs of the Ark of the Covenant and the mercy seat. This intertextual and symbolic interpretation likewise explains Mary Magdalene’s lack of fear and astonishment in her interaction with supernatural beings.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.