Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 3

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  objet
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
100%
EN
The Beckettian theatre describes the agony of the modern world. His character as shown in the phenomenon of his perception, even when limited to four aspects: body, items, time and the Other, let us confirm the validity of Beckett’s reflections about a man who is lost, terrified and resigned to our world.
EN
The emergence of the Musée du quai Branly project and its inauguration in Paris in 2006 have sparked off many controversies and stimulated numerous debates about the politics of representation, the colonial heritage in museum collections, the influence of art dealers, the role of indigenous communities, but also and above all the often antagonistic relationship between ethnographic and aesthetic approaches. It is not our intention here to reopen the controversy of the origins or to settle the alternative between the End of Art and the end of museum ethnography. On the contrary, we wish to place ourselves in a historical perspective, and to take advantage of this contribution to lay down some milestones in an intellectual journey that began more than a century ago and which is still often written in the mode of discontinuity.
EN
Roman Law is often considered as an intellectual matrix of contemporary laws and in particular French civil law. However, even if the vocabulary persisted, some legal concepts went throught great changes across history as law was step by step related to a subject’s power. The notion of thing originally meant the trial, the case, the litigious situation managed by the legal process. In this way the thing was directly a res iuris. In contemporary law system, the thing ordinarily specifies some goods on which the subject applies his property power. This view is understandable considering the evolution due to the theorization of subjective law that leads to promote a strong and exclusive separation between persons and things while Roman law could imbricate these legal categories.
PL
Niniejszy artykuł porusza problematykę konceptu res, którego znaczenie ewoluowało na przestrzeni wieków od czasów prawa rzymskiego do czasów współczesnych. Prawo rzymskie często jest postrzegane jako matryca intelektualna współczesnych systemów prawnych. Należy jednak pamiętać, że proces zapożyczania pojęć praw rzymskiego jest zagadnieniem złożonym. W bardzo wielu przypadkach zapożyczona instytucja była modyfikowana i dostosowywana do realiów systemu, który ją recypował. Między innymi doprowadziło to do wyraźnego rozróżnienia na osoby i rzeczy we współczesnych systemach prawnych, mimo że w prawie rzymskim istniała możliwość łączenia tych kategorii.
FR
 Le droit romain est souvent considéré comme une matrice intellectuelle, linguistique et conceptuelle des droits européens contemporains et en particulier du droit civil français. Toutefois, si le vocabulaire a persisté dans une certaine mesure, des notions juridiques fondamentales ont subi de profondes transformations au cours de l’histoire à mesure que le droit s’assimilait progressivement à un pouvoir. Il en est ainsi du concept de chose qui désignait à l’origine le procès ou la situation litigieuse mise en forme par la procédure juridique en droit romain. Dans le système contemporain, la chose signifie d’ordinaire un bien matériel indépendant du sujet dans la droite application de la théorisation moderne du droit subjectif. Cette conception est le fruit d’une opposition nette entre le sujet et l’objet, laquelle a promu une catégorisation étanche des personnes et des choses inconnue du droit romain.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.