Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 10

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  offspring
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
The parenthood occupies a special place among family roles. The role of a mother or a father opens new perspectives and contributes certain values and experiences to the life of the individual. It can be assumed that the successful development of an offspring is one of the most important criteria of the successful parenthood. The mental handicap of a child is a factor determining the implementation of parental roles, and thus an individual development of mother or father. The results of study of parents with mentally handicapped child are presented in the paper.
EN
The phenomenon of divorce concerns at present a significant number of marriages, including sacramental marriages. The phenomenon of divorce is most frequently a subject of interest for sociologists and lawyers. Less often, divorce happens to be the subject of reflection of moral theology, and when it is, in reflecting the issues of the conditions of moral acceptability of divorce and pastoral consequences for the sacramental life are discussed. Although these are important themes of a very complex issue, it seems that they do not include some aspects, which are essential in the face of making decisions about of the separation of the spouses, the breaking down of marital life and its results for the spouses themselves, the family and the community in which they live. The category which, in a systematic way, takes into consideration the complexity of moral issues connected with divorce, is the responsibility understood as a duty experienced by every person in his/her conscience and obligation to take action. The notion is strictly connected with personal responsibility to give an account of every action or its abandonment, as well as acceptance of the guilt resulting from it and making atonement. In the case of the decision of divorce, it is first of all the responsibility of the spouses for each other, for the offspring, but also for the community of believers – the Church. The following text is an attempt to present the complex aspects of responsibility that arise in the face of divorce on the three mentioned planes of life.
Ius Matrimoniale
|
2004
|
vol. 15
|
issue 9
115-136
EN
L'analisi della giurisprudenza della Rota Romana degli ultimi anni riguardante le cause di nullité del matrimonio ob exclusum bonum prolis ci permette di osservare che alcune questioni hanno ancora bisogno di una più chiara precisazione . Si tratta soprattutto della determinazione dei contenuto specifico dell’espressione bonum coniugum e inoltre: della essenza della esclusione dei bonum prolis, dei positivo atto di volonté escludente e delle sue forme, della distinzione tra ius e usus iuris, dei fenomeno della procreazione artificiale riguardo alla esclusione dei bonum prolis, della prova giudiziale della esclusione dello stesso bonum . Tutte quelle questioni fanno 1’oggetto dell’ analisi delle senteze rotali.
EN
The article juxtaposes and contrasts the essence of marriage as understood by the Catholic Church and the Muslim concept of a relationship between a woman and a man. Its objective is to demonstrate whether it is possible to enter matrimony which would be fully compatible with canon law and Muslim law and to present the difficulties that tend to arise in such marriages. It argues that a Muslim may relate most of the attributes and objectives taught by the Catholic Church to the marriage bond, with the exception of honoring baptism and Catholic upbringing of his children. Muslim law stipulates that a Muslim’s children must be brought up in the faith of their father and urges the father to prevent the Christian mother from exercising any religious influence over their children. Although the Christian mother may obtain dispensation from the impediment of different faiths by, among other things, doing her best to baptize her children and to bring them up in her faith, in practice this is impossible because of the father’s legal obligation.
EN
In view of the fact that issues related to the family in the literary works of Stanisław Wawrzyniec Staszic are far less known than his socio-political views or his opinions about education, the author of this paper decided to creatively explore this treasure of Polish culture. The results of this study may significantly enhance the educational resources of sub-disciplines of teaching like familial teaching, the history of upbringing, the theory of upbringing and general teaching. Quoting from Stanisław Staszic, the author provides answers to several research issues, namely how Staszic perceived the family and what tasks (and missions) he assigned to family members, the parents and the offspring; the types of primeval families he identified (using the criterion of the law of nature); the role that he assigned to families with respect to the integration of mankind, the integration of a nation, and Poland regaining independence; the factors which, in his opinion, were the main obstacles to families undertaking historical tasks (including Polish families). In order to define these issues, the author of this paper used hermeneutic methods to interpret the literary output of Stanisław Staszic, revealing in the process the philosopher’s views on the family, its tasks, functions and the roles of its members, with special emphasis placed on the mother, father and the offspring. An analysis of the types of families in the initial phases of the existence of mankind was another effort worth making together with considering the obstacles that families encounter when carrying out their historical tasks
EN
Dietrich von Hildebrand already at the beginning of the twentieth century published two works which contributed to the pending debate on particular aspects of Catholic marriage. The major concern of authors involved was spectrum of issues regarding love in marriage and the purpose of marriage defined as proles, fides, sacramentum. The aftermaths of that debate, according to interpreters, are reflected in a contemporary teaching on marriage, especially in its point regarding the ends of marriage. In this paper we present to how extend D. von Hildebrand developed the new stance on the purpose of marriage. He decided to speak when noticed that the traditional teaching on marriage contain flaws, or that love is neglected in teaching on marriage. In what follows we expose the following: von Hildebrand's disagreement with Aquinas, novum in von Hildebrand's writings, reception of his thought. Next, on the basis of source materials we point out that von Hildebrand employs the new word „meaning” in explaing the role of love in marriage. We show that there is a question what this word exactly would signify and how to adjust von Hildebrand's vocabulary to the Latin notions in which the teaching on marriage is formulated. In the last part we present how interpreters understand von Hildebrand's reflection. We turn to both, the early reception of his thought and to interpretations offered by contemporary authors. Our final conclusion is that voices who recognize von Hildebrand amongst influential authors on the matter are justified, and have their background in source texts.
Annales Canonici
|
2022
|
vol. 18
|
issue 1
49-83
EN
In the area of canonical marital consent, one of the most „sensitive” issues is the issue of exclusion – by a positive act of will – bonum prolis, i.e. to bear children (it is an essential part of marriage). By entering into marriage, the parties undertake the mutual right-obligation to perform marital acts: uniting and open to procreation. Bearing in mind can. 1101 § 2 of the CIC, one can speak of the possibility of exclusion by the nupturient of bonum prolis. The author touches on a significant thematic thread concerning the subject of this exclusion resulting in the nullity of marriage. So he asks whether it is only the right to marital acts open to procreation (ipsum ius) or also the exercise of this right (usus iuris). Referring to the doctrine and jurisprudence of the Roman Rota, he shares the overwhelming view that only the exclusion of the right (ipsum ius) to matrimonial acts open to procreation invalidates the marriage, not the exclusion of usus iuris. Thus, it points to the validity of the distinction between the exclusion of ipsum ius and the exclusion of usus iuris.
PL
W obszarze kanonicznej zgody małżeńskiej jedna z najbardziej „newralgicznych” kwestii dotyczy wykluczenia – pozytywnym aktem woli – bonum prolis, czyli skierowania małżeństwa m.in. ku zrodzeniu potomstwa (jest to istotny element małżeństwa). Zawierając małżeństwo, strony podejmują wzajemnie prawo-obowiązek spełniania aktów małżeńskich: jednoczących i otwartych na prokreację. Mając na uwadze kan. 1101 § 2 KPK, można mówić o możliwości wykluczenia przez nupturienta bonum prolis. Autor porusza znaczący wątek odnoszący się do przedmiotu tego wykluczenia skutkującego nieważnością małżeństwa. Pyta więc, czy jest nim jedynie prawo do aktów małżeńskich otwartych na prokreację (ipsum ius) czy również wykonywanie tego prawa (usus iuris). Odwołując się do doktryny i orzecznictwa Roty Rzymskiej, podziela przeważający pogląd, że tylko wykluczenie ipsum ius do aktów małżeńskich otwartych na prokreację unieważnia małżeństwo, nie zaś wykluczenie usus iuris. Tym samym wskazuje na zasadność rozróżnienia pomiędzy wykluczeniem ipsum ius i wykluczeniem usus iuris.
EN
The purpose of the family and guardianship legal accion is focused on reintegrating the dysfunctional family environment. This dysfunction is interpreted as a failure in forming a family which responds adequately to the challenges and tasks as stipulated by the Family and Guardianship Code. Generally speaking, every executory legal action in such matters as the parental rights, the civil incapacitation or the forced alcohol addiction treatment is aimed in providing aid to the subjects of the proceeedings and the relief for their families. The Family and Guardianship Court decisions have as their objective the elimination of the dysfunctions that might have appeared in the life of an individual and his or her family.
PL
Istota sądowego postępowania wykonawczego w sprawach rodzinnych i opiekuńczych sprowadza się do reintegracji środowiska dysfunkcjonalnej rodziny. Dysfunkcjonalność rodziny stanowi rewers funkcjonalności, to jest prawidłowej i sprawnej realizacji celów oraz zadań, które są jej przypisywane normami Kodeksu rodzinnego i opiekuńczego. Generalnie rzecz ujmując, przedmiotem każdego z postępowań wykonawczych, czyli w sprawach z zakresu władzy rodzicielskiej, osób ubezwłasnowolnionych oraz osób uzależnionych od alkoholu zobowiązanych do poddania się leczeniu odwykowemu, jest pomoc i ochrona udzielana uczestnikowi tego postępowania oraz jego rodzinie. Ingerencja sądu opiekuńczego w tym postępowaniu w każdej z przedstawionych kategorii spraw dąży w swoim założeniu do anihilacji powstałej dysfunkcjonalności jednostki i jej rodziny. 
Ius Matrimoniale
|
2017
|
vol. 28
|
issue 3
99-114
EN
The presented sentence of the Roman Rota, to which the author provides a comment, concerns nullitatis matrimonii, which was heard by the turnus c. Monier on the grounds of exclusion by the female defendant of the indissolubility of marriage and offspring. This sentence was passed by another instance, after obtaining by the male claimant nova proposition causae (in the first and third instance the sentence was negative, in the second instance it was positive); the defendant failed to attend all three instances. However, her testimony given in c. Monier instance, fully confirmed by the claimant and witnesses, unequivocally demonstrated that she simulated marriage consent – both in reference to bonum sacamenti and bonum prolis (the reason for both simulations were her beliefs concerning marriage and its procreative purpose, which deviated from the teaching of the Church). The sentence of the Roman Rota c. Monier is an example of an in-depth assessment of means of proof, which enabled to convincingly declare the nullity of marriage.
EN
The article is a view of relation that bonds Stanislaw Ignacy Witkiewicz and Jadwiga Unrug- -Witkiewicz that emerges from his mails to the wife. His view of imperfect relationship of man and woman, marriage, a relation towards the sacrament, offspring, love and faithfulness contains the traces of God’s reality.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.