Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 3

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  patriarchowie Izraela
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
Collectanea Theologica
|
2018
|
vol. 88
|
issue 4
139-162
EN
The popularity that the Book of Genesis enjoyed among the membersof the Qumran community (28 or more copies) undoubtedly accounted forthe great number of the works inspired by its content that functioned as theparaphrase of the biblical material. Hence, in the scrolls interpreting thenarrative of Gen 12–50 there were found in the Dead Sea Scrolls there arerelatively many references and allusions to the patriarchs Abraham, Isaacand Jacob. Unfortunately, most of the texts – apart from the Genesis Apocryphon(1QapGen) – survived in a very fragmentary state only, thereforetheir interpretation meets serious difficulties and any conclusions should bedrawn with the extreme cautiousness. Nevertheless, it can be acknowledgedthat, in many cases, the authors of the Qumran texts paraphrasing Gen12–50, on the one hand enriched the biblical material with new elementsby extending and supplementing it and, on the other hand, as in the biblicalnarratives of Gen, portray the patriarchs in a standard sequence listing theirnames (i.e. Abraham – Isaac – Jacob) in the context of the covenant and ofthe divine promises, and present them as the models of obedience, loyaltyand faithfulness to God.
2
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Abraham versus Jakub

84%
EN
This article deals with the process of the formation of the traditionsconcerning the three patriarchs in the book of Genesis. It can already bestated that the traditions concerning Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob were initiallyformed independently of each other. Chronological priority shouldbe assigned to the tradition concerning Jacob. It was originally somehowcombined with the tradition concerning Isaac (in Amos), and at the timebefore the exile it constituted the earliest point of reference for seeking theroots and identity of Israel. Only by the end of the exile did the particulartime and situation cause the local Judaean traditions concerning Abrahamto play a greater role also from a theological aspect. Abraham then becamenot only a model of faith and an example of behaviour for the exiles and therepatriates, but also from a the first link in the chain of the three patriarchs.It is possible that at that time some of the motifs of the story of Abrahamwere borrowed from the traditions concerning Isaac (cf. Gen 26).
EN
The article is an attempt to summarize the problems which come intoview when the patriarchs of Israel are studied. More particularly, the attentionis focused on the question of whether they are eponyms, legendaryfigures or historical persons. The narrative of Gen 12–50 was composedin the Persian period, so the distance from the possible time when Abraham,Isaac and Joseph/Israel lived is very long. This problem is connectedwith the role of archaeology and extra-biblical evidence. Regarding thepatriarchs the question is posed whether they in fact “existed”, that is, ifthey are historical persons or literary imaginations invented by authors ofthe second part of Genesis.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.