Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 4

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  personal pronoun
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
This study is based upon discursive and logometric analysis of the political speeches delivered by the candidates during the campaign and pre-campaign phases of the 2012 presidential elections in France, taking into account the results of previous studies related to the 2007 presidential elections. The present paper aims at tracing the different representations of the speaker within his own speeches and at analyzing the way he verbalizes himself in his campaign by observing the use, the distribution, the role and the possible impact of “I” and of the other personal pronouns within the frame of political communication. The analysis of statistical data tends to emphasize syntactic as well as morphological, stylistic, lexical, and gramatical distinctive features of the speeches delivered by the candidates to the presidential elections, especially in relation with the new possibilities conveyed by internet.
EN
This paper deals with the information function of two nominal suffixes, -i appearing in all nouns, and -n- in first- and second-person pronouns in Basketo, a North Omotic language predominantly spoken in the Basketo Special Woreda in Ethiopia. The suffix -i is often described as nominative. However, object nouns without definite marker can be marked by -i, and as a result -i can appear in both subject and object in the same sentence. We analyze morpheme -i as a marker of specificity. Suffix -n- distinguishes short and long forms of the first- and second-person subject pronoun. The short form is the same as the possessive. In general, possessive does not bear any pragmatic information in discourse. Likewise, short pronouns also show no pragmatic function, but show what is subject or agent in a clause. On the other hand, long pronouns are morphologically and pragmatically marked. We analyze morpheme -n- as the foregrounded topic in discourse in contrast with zero anaphora.
4
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Dvě zajímavé marginálie

51%
Bohemistyka
|
2019
|
issue 1
121-124
EN
In colloquial Czech we see few cases of not repeating the preposition in utterances such as Nemám nic proti němu ani ní. They are also situations when j – n alternation in personal pronouns occurs. We cannot recommend using such phrases. Verbal adjectives are formed from the past participle or the passive participle. In some cases, when deverbatives can be formed from both participles, they are synonymous in meaning (ochrnutý, ochrnulý člověk). In other cases, the meaning differs (uznaný gól x uznalý nadřízený). We are not aware of reliable rules for non-native speakers of Czech which would describe their derivation and meanings. A foreigner has to learn each lexeme individually.
CS
V kolokviální češtině se setkáváme s nepříliš početnými případy neopakování předložky ve výpovědích typu Nemám nic proti němu ani ní. I v takových situacích u osobních zájmen dochází ke konsonantické alternaci j – n. Užívání takových spojení nedoporučujeme. Přídavná jména slovesná se tvoří od příčestí minulého nebo trpného. V některých případech, kdy je tvoření možné od obou příčestí, jsou deverbativa po významové stránce synonymní (ochrnutý, ochrnulý člověk), jindy jsou významově odlišena (uznaný gól x uznalý nadřízený). Spolehlivá pravidla vystihující jejich derivaci a významy nejsou pro potřeby jinojazyčných mluvčích formulována. Cizinec se musí řídit územ a jednotlivé lexémy se naučit.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.