Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 4

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  politicalness
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Content available remote

Notatki z Folger

100%
EN
The text written by Stanley Fish, which is an excerpt from his book Professional Correctness. Literary Studies and Political Change (Oxford 1995), is an attempt at a presentation and a discussion of the main conditioning factors and the aporia of interpretation. From among the four arguments given by the author, i.e. intention, historicalness, politicalness and interdisciplinarity, only the first one has been established to be an immanent feature of each of interpretations. This results from the conviction that while interpreting literary texts we are always subjected to the pressure of the surrounding premises. It is just the extensive and thorough analysis of these premises, to which the supporters of political, historical and interdisciplinary criticism refer to that makes the author of the sketch possible to show that behind each of the methods there are individual interests and a different vision of the world. To realize these determinants is to enable us to question the very need of universal interpretation. By questioning the theoretical fundamentals of the three mentioned modes of interpretation, the author admits frankly that the work of an interpreter can have both historical, political and just as well interdisciplinary character, though this observation is by all means tantamount to a recognition of the legitimacy of any of the criticized methods.
EN
The author analyses Hannah Arendt’s writings in search of inspirations for reflecting on the contemporary world’s problems in humanistic (school) education, finding such inspirations in the topics that interested the author of The Human Condition and in her perception of politics, citizenship and thinking as such. Koc’s thesis is that educational documents show a clear deficit of reflection on current challenges, often transnational, that need to be analysed from multiple angles. The article emphasises Arendt’s warningsabout non-thinking as an attitude conducive to totalitarianism, which should unsettle anyone interested in the concept of educating young people. Reconstructing Arendt’s axiology of citizenship and emphasising thevalue of journalistic texts as stories that uncover ambiguity and ask key questions, the author calls for a reconsideration of the nature of Polish language education in contemporary school.
PL
Artykuł przedstawia analizę literatury Briny Svit na podstawie konceptualizacji literatury mniejszej według Deleuze’a i Guattariego. Pojęcia takie jak (de)terytorializacja (schizofrenia), literatura mniejsza, jak i inne wyznaczniki literatury mniejszej zostały zastosowane w analizie komparatystycznej różnych składników literackich. Artykuł wyznacza trajektorię (definiowaną jako deterytorializacja, deedypalizacja, polityczność i kolektywność), która przejawia się w powieściach Svit napisanych po słoweńsku oraz w powieściach napisanych w języku francuskim. Lieratura Briny Svit umiejscawiana jest pomiędzy literaturą mniejszą a literaturą mniejszościową.
EN
The article draws on the Deleuzoguattarian conceptualisation of minor literature in order to analyse the literature of Brina Svit. The concepts of (de)territorialisation (schizophrenia), minor, and other attributes of minor literature are employed in the comparative analysis of different literary elements of four of Brina Svit’s novels. The article outlines the ‘line of flight’ (defined as deterritorialisation, de-oedipisation, politicalness, and collectiveness) that manifests itself from Svit’s novels written in Slovenian to the novels written in French. The literature of Brina Svit is placed in between minor literature and minority literature.
4
83%
PL
Celem artykułu jest analiza relacji między polityką a tożsamością. Ukazano ten problem w dwóch wymiarach. Pierwszy obejmuje problematykę związaną z uwikłaniem czy używaniem kategorii tożsamości w formalno-prawnym kontekście w sferze stosunków etnicznych w Polsce. Drugi zaś dotyczy procesów identyfkacyjnych, pojawiających się na styku polityczności i tożsamości. W związku z tym rozważano dwa główne problemy: jakiej koncepcji tożsamości wymaga polityczny dyskurs oraz co dzieje się z tożsamością w momencie jej upolitycznienia.
EN
The aim of this article is to analyze relations between two phenomena – politics and identity. These issues are discussed in the context of two aspects. Firstly, the attention is focused on the way how the notion of identity is used or enmeshed in the legal aspect of ethnic relations in Poland. Secondly, identifcation processes are reconsidered as being the result of the permeation of political and identity dimension. Therefore, two main questions are posed: what kind of conceptualization of the notion of “identity” is needed in the context of political discourse and what “happens to identity” at the moment of its politicisation.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.