Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 5

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  prawa i obowiązki małżeńskie
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Problematyka małżeństw mieszanych w kontekście wypełniania istotnych praw-obowiązków małżeńskich

100%
Gierat K.
Ius Matrimoniale
|
2000
|
vol. 11
|
issue 5
63-101
EN
Wenn die Eltern im Glauben geteilt sind, so kann die einzige vernünftige Lösung ausschließlich in der Erziehung aller Kinder im Sinne bloß des einen oder bzw. des anderen einzigen Glauben liegen. Schmerzhafte Frage dabei ist, welche von dieser Religionen überwiegen soll? Antwort auf diese Frage, welche die Katholische Kirche mit einer autoritativen Aussage und Rechtmäßigkeit tut, ist die, daß alle Kinder in der Katholischen Kirche getauft und erzogen werden sollen. In der Praxis verbindet sich dies oft mit ernsten Problemen, die sowohl seitens der Eltern, wie auch ihrer Kinder in Erfahrung gebracht werden. Ob jedenfalls die Katholische Kirche tatsächlich anders verfahren kann, ohne gleichzeitig den Glauben an sich zu verlieren, sowie ohne Verneinung ihrer eigenen Persönlichkeit?
2
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Poważny brak rozeznania oceniającego co do istotnych praw i obowiązków małżeńskich a nieważność małżeństwa (kan. 1095, n. 2)

80%
Góralski W.
Ius Matrimoniale
|
1990
|
vol. 1
33-57
EN
Nel contrarre matrimonio non basta il semplice uso della ragione ma occorre "sufficiens discretio iudicii" seu "iudicii maturitas contractui proportionata" (Gasparri). Il grado di "discretio" sufficiente e necessario per poter contrarre validamente si detentiina in riferimento ai diritti ed obblighi essenziali che si debbono scambievolmente dare e ricevere nel porre in essere il matrimonio. La "discretion iudicii"non e che la capacità di intendere e di volere il matrimonio, e quindi di "eligere e deliberare" liberamente di porre in essere quest'atto. Il "defectus discretionis iudicii" pub essere causato delle nevrosi (neurastenia, psicastenia, isteria) o dalle psicopatie (nelle sue diverse forme). La giurisprudenza rotale ha sempre considerato che soltanto la nevrosi o la psicopatia grave pub impedire la "discretio iudicii" proporzionata al matrimonio. Tra le prove della mancanza della "discretio iudicii" un ruolo molto omportante si deve attribuire alle "peritio iudicia- lis" con la quale tuttavia il giudice non può essere determinato.
3
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Wyrok Sądu Kościelnego we Włocławku (c. Grzęźlikowski) z 13.10.1997 r. w sprawie o nieważność małżeństwa z tytułu poważnego braku rozeznania oceniającego co do istotnych praw i obowiązków małżeńskich (kan. 1095, n. 2 KPK)

80%
Grzęźlikowski c.
Ius Matrimoniale
|
2003
|
vol. 14
|
issue 8
231-241
EN
Plaintiff brought a suit against his matrimony contracted with N. on 22nd of January 1984 in Saint Patrick's Cathedral in Auckland in New Zealand. N. in virtue of lack of judging discernment regarding matrimonial rights and duties on his side (can. 1095, 2 Code of Canonical Proeedings) suggesting that in was caused by fact that being on emigration in New Zealand, missing the country of origin and family, being mentally woebegone and being depressed, he had restricted will and critical cognizance and was not able to have evaluotion of matrimonial agreement subject and its free choice. He also thought that because of arisen situation and due to his individualistic immaturity in moment of contracting the matrimony, he had lack of judging discernment regarding the matrimonial rights and dubes. He lodged a complaint for nullity of marriage to the tribunal of his place of residence in March 1996. Defendant was living in England in that time. Tribunal Włocławek obtained - acco rding to canonic regulations 1673, 4 Code of C nonical Proceedings - a permission to wunduct a case from the tribunal of defendant's place of residence. Hearing of evidence induded hearing of the parties, witnesses and examination of the plaintiff by psychologist expert appointed by the wurt, who issued an opinion. Confronting the legal motives submitted in case with actual real motives, after taking the cognizance of plaintiffs notes after publishing the files of a case and before – sentence notes of the defender of matrimonial union, the board of judges passed a sentence in favour of validity of appealed marriage. It was found that: 1. plaintiff could be really actually mentally depressed, emotionally trembling, he missed his country and family, however that state was not as strong and serious to make him not to realize the fact of what the marriage was; 2. facts that he left Poland by himself and chose emigration by himself indicate that he was self-dependent and individualistically mature; 3. lack of discernment was not confirmed by testimonies of defendant and witnesses as well as circumstances of marriage contracting, its course and actual reasons of marriage breakdown; 4. expert appointed by the court found the plaintiff individualistically mature and found no reasons that would cause the plaintiff to have of ability of due judgment of what the matrimony is and which obligations it put him under as well as ability to express matrimonial consent; 5. plaintifs cognitive and volitive powers were able to evaluate correctly the resulted situation, correctly express matrimonial consent and express matrimonial consent in correct and volid way. Second Instance Tribunal from Gniezno confirmal a sentence of Tribunal form Włocławek suggesting the plaintiff to possibly lodge a complaint for nullity of marriage in virtue of simulation of matrimonial condent on his side.
4
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Wpływ ograniczenia wolności wewnętrznej na brak rozeznania oceniającego co do istotnych praw i obowiązków małżeńskich w świetle wyroku Roty Rzymskiej c. Pompedda z 19.5.1994 r.

80%
Dzierżon G.
Ius Matrimoniale
|
2000
|
vol. 11
|
issue 5
217-223
EN
Si trata di una sentenza rotale negativa, emanata dal titolo del can. 1095 n. 2. Il ponente rotale ha concentrato la sua attenzione alla questione di libertà interna dei contraenti. In questo studio si presenta e commenta tutte le parti suddetta sentenza sia „in iure” che „in facto”.
5
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Pojęcie „dobro potomstwa” jako źródło praw i obowiązków małżeńskich w świetle prawa kanonicznego

71%
Mierzejewski K.
Studia Gdańskie
|
2011
|
issue 29
123-139
PL
Ustanowiony przez Boga wyłączny i nierozerwalny związek pomiędzy mężczyzną i kobietą, realizuje się we wspólnocie całego życia, skierowanej ze swej natury do dobra małżonków oraz do zrodzenia i wychowania potomstwa. Niezmienna od stuleci nauka Kościoła o celu prokreacyjnym małżeństwa, wzbogacona przesłaniem Soboru Watykańskiego II, stanowi wykładnię prawa naturalnego. Ukierunkowanie owej wspólnoty życia, jaką jest małżeństwo ku zrodzeniu potomstwa należy do istoty małżeństwa. Nowy Kodeks prawa kanonicznego odstąpił od wyszczególniania pierwszorzędnego i drugorzędnego celu małżeństwa oraz przyjął w kan. 1055 §1 formułę o skierowaniu tego związku ku dobru małżonków i ku zrodzeniu i wychowaniu potomstwa. Wypływające ze skierowania małżeństwa do zrodzenia potomstwa prawa-obowiązki małżonków pozostają wyrazem wzajemnego oddania się i przekazania małżeńskiego stron w wymiarze ich własnej męskości i kobiecości. Artykuł bazuje przede wszystkim na Kodeksie prawa kanonicznego z 1917 i 1983 r., dokumentach Kościoła, wyrokach Roty Rzymskiej oraz nauczaniu św. Augustyna.
EN
An exclusive and indissoluble relation between a man and a woman, established by God, accomplishes in the community of a whole life, which is directed by nature at the good of the spouses, and at the procreation and children upbringing. Unchanged for ages, Ecclesial science about the spouses procreative aim, enriched by the Second Vatican Council message, is the exposition of the natural law. A direction of the life community, which is the marriage for the children procreation, belongs to the essence of marriage. A new Canonical Law Code departed from the specification of the first and second aim of the marriage, and assumed in Can 1055 §1 a form to direct this relationship at the good of the spouses and at the procreation and children upbringing. Rights and duties of the spouses, which come from directing the marriage to children procreation, are the expression of the mutual devotion and marital transmission of the sides in the dimension of their own masculinity and feminity. The article relies mostly on Canonical Law Code from 1917 and 1983, Ecclesial acts, judgments of the Roman Rota, and St. Augustine Teaching.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.