Search results

1

Wzajemność i wdzięczność

100%

Łukaszyński J.

Społeczeństwo i Ekonomia

|

2015

|

issue 1(3)

134-151

EN

This paper presents the issue of reciprocity in the context of gratitude. The rule of reciprocity basing on the psychological and social compulsion of giving and receiving gifts and services is one of the most important and permanent regulators of social, economic and political life. There are various concepts of reciprocity. It starts from the ancient principle of reciprocity (do ut des − I give that you may give) and ends with contemporary theories of interactionism, theories of social exchange or the philosophy of meeting. Regarding the concepts of gratitude, the rule of reciprocity may be expressed as the norms of social life inducing people to symmetrical behavior. The author points some of its factors.

2

Gry a wzajemność

100%

Łukaszyński J.

Nauki Społeczne

|

2013

|

issue 2 (8)

210-226

EN

This paper presents the issue of reciprocity in the context of games. Reciprocity is one of the central problems of numerous concepts explaining social relations. It starts from the ancient principle of reciprocity (do ut des − I give that you may give) and end with contemporary theories of interactionism, theories of social exchange or the philosophy of the meeting. What is common in various concepts of games is a condition of reciprocity. The principle of reciprocity holds a prominent position in various concepts of games. There are various concepts of reciprocity and various concepts of principle of reciprocity. Regarding concepts of games, the principle of reciprocity may be expressed as the norms of the social life inducing the people to symmetrical behavior.

3

Inkontrologiczna koncepcja wzajemności

100%

Łukaszyński J.

Nauki Społeczne

|

2013

|

issue 1(7)

112-131

EN

This paper presents the issue of reciprocity in the context of Andrzej Nowicki’s incontrology. Reciprocity is one of the central problems of numerous concepts explaining social relations. It starts from the ancient principle of reciprocity (do ut des − I give that you may give) and end with contemporary theories of interactionism, theories of social exchange or the philosophy of the meeting. In the theory of social exchange reciprocity pertains to exchange. In the philosophy of the meeting this is not the case for reciprocity. Reciprocity does not signify exchange. What is common in various versions of the philosophy of the meeting is a restrictive condition of current reciprocity consisting in mutual and permanent transformation of personalities in people meeting each other. By creating his own concept of the philosophy of the meeting, namely incontrology, Andrzej Nowicki became one of many eminent thinkers focused on reciprocity. Andrzej Nowicki discovered the value of reciprocity, as a historian of philosophy in philosophies developed by Giordano Bruno, Julio Cesare Vanini or Girolamo Fracastoro and others. The author of incontrology discerned the importance of the notion of reciprocity for Władysław Witwicki’s theory of kratyzm. He used this theory to create his own division of meetings with a portrait. Though Andrzej Nowicki was not involved in studies on the principle of reciprocity, it holds a prominent position in incontrology. Its positive version (Bronisław Malinowski’s do ut des) may be expressed in the following manner: I create so that you might create, too. “Whenever I take the risk of ridiculousness,” admits the originator of incontrology, “I write about myself and my achievements. I do so in order to spur ambition in my disciples and readers [...]. Try it and you might be able to do something like this as well if you want”.67 For Andrzej Nowicki the most important value is culture, the creator of which is a human being, a co-originator existing in objects created by him (works) and in other people’s minds. A human being exists in mutual relations between the authors, artists and audience of high culture.

4

Polskie koncepcje wzajemności. Wybrane problemy

88%

Łukaszyński J.

Społeczeństwo i Ekonomia

|

2014

|

issue 2 (2)

73-90

EN

Reciprocity is one of the central problems of numerous concepts explaining social relations. It starts from the ancient principle of reciprocity (do ut des − I give that you may give) and ends with contemporary theories of interactionism, theories of social exchange or the philosophy of the meeting. This paper presents selected problems of Polish conceptions of principle of reciprocity. There are two sorts of authors. The first sort of authors denies the value of the principle of reciprocity for contemporary social life (for example Z. Bauman and K. Szewczyk). The second refers to practical implications of the principle of reciprocity (for example M. Flis and J. Bierówka).

5

Zasada wzajemności. Wybrane problemy

88%

Łukaszyński J.

Społeczeństwo i Ekonomia

|

2014

|

issue 1 (1)

238-256

EN

This paper presents selected problems of principle of reciprocity. Reciprocity is one of the central problems of numerous concepts explaining social relations. It starts from the ancient principle of reciprocity (do ut des − I give that you may give) and ends with contemporary theories of interactionism, theories of social exchange or the philosophy of the meeting. In the theory of social exchange reciprocity pertains to exchange. In the philosophy of the meeting this is not the case for reciprocity. Reciprocity does not signify exchange. What is common in various versions of the philosophy of the meeting is a restrictive condition of current reciprocity consisting in mutual and permanent transformation of personalities in people meeting each other.There are two sorts of authors. The first sort of authors, deny the value of the principle of reciprocity for contemporary social life. The second sort of authors refers to practical implications of the principle of reciprocity. They show value of the principle of reciprocity for contemporary customs norm, moral and social life.

6

Inkontrologiczna koncepcja wzajemności Andrzeja Rusława Nowickiego

51%

Łukaszyński J.

Kultura i Wartości

|

2013

|

issue 5

DE

Der Artikel stellt die Frage der Gegenseitigkeit im Kontext der Inkontrologie von Andrzej Nowicki dar. Die Gegenseitigkeit ist eines der zentralen Probleme in vielen Entwürfen, die soziale Verhältnisse erklären. In der Theorie des sozialen Austauschs wird die Gegenseitigkeit auf den Austausch bezogen. In der Philosophie der Begegnung ist es aber anders, hier bedeutet die Gegenseitigkeit nicht mehr den Austausch. Verschiedene Varianten der Philosophie der Begegnung verbindet die Bedingung einer aktuellen Gegenseitigkeit, die auf der beiderseitigen, dauerhaften Verwandlung der Persönlichkeiten der Begegnenden beruht. Indem A. Nowicki eigenen Entwurf der Philosophie der Begegnung – die Inkontrologie – schuf, fand er sich im Kreis hervorragender Denker, die sich mit der Gegenseitigkeit befassten. Als Historiker der Philosophie entdeckte er den Wert der Gegenseitigkeit u.a. bei solchen Philosophen wie G. Bruno, J.C. Vaninio, G. Fracastoro. A. Nowicki nahm auch die Bedeutung des Begriffs Gegenseitigkeit für die Ansichten von W. Witwicki wahr. Diese Theorie nahm er auch in Anspruch, indem er eigene Aufteilung der Begegnungen mit dem Porträt aufstellte.

EN

This paper presents the issue of reciprocity in the context of Andrzej Nowicki’s incontrology. Reciprocity is one of the central problems of numerous concepts explaining social relations. In the theory of social exchange reciprocity pertains to exchange. In the philosophy of the encounter (meeting) this is not the case because reciprocity does not signify exchange. What is common in various versions of the philosophy of the encounter is a condition of current reciprocity consisting in mutual and permanent transformation of personalities in people meeting each other. By creating his own concept of the philosophy of the encounter, notably incontrology, Andrzej Nowicki became one of many eminent thinkers focused on reciprocity. Andrzej Nowicki discovered the value of reciprocity; as a historian of philosophy in the philosophies developed by Giordano Bruno, Julio Cesare Vanini or Girolamo Fracastoro and others. The author of incontrology discerned the importance of the notion of reciprocity for the ideas of Władysław Witwicki. He also employed this theory to create his own distinction of the encounters with a portrait.

PL

Artykuł przedstawia zagadnienie wzajemności w kontekście inkontrologii Andrzeja Nowickiego. Wzajemność to jedno z centralnych zagadnień wielu koncepcji wyjaśniających stosunki społeczne. W teorii wymiany społecznej wzajemność odnoszona jest do wymiany. W filozofii spotkania jest inaczej, tu wzajemność nie oznacza już wymiany. Różne wersje filozofii spotkania łączy warunek aktualnej wzajemności, polegającej na obustronnym, trwałym przekształceniu osobowości spotykających się osób. A. Nowicki, tworząc własną koncepcję filozofii spotkania – inkontrologię, znalazł się w gronie wielu wybitnych myślicieli zajmujących się wzajemnością. Odkrył wartość wzajemności, jako historyk filozofii, m. in. u takich filozofów, jak G. Bruno, J. C. Vanini, G. Fracastoro. A. Nowicki dostrzegł też znaczenie pojęcia wzajemność dla poglądów W. Witwickiego. Teorię tę wykorzystał również, tworząc własny podział spotkań z portretem.

Refine search results

3 Społeczeństwo i Ekonomia

2 Nauki Społeczne

1 Kultura i Wartości

6 Łukaszyński J.

1 2015

2 2014

3 2013

Wzajemność i wdzięczność

Gry a wzajemność

Inkontrologiczna koncepcja wzajemności

Polskie koncepcje wzajemności. Wybrane problemy

Zasada wzajemności. Wybrane problemy

Inkontrologiczna koncepcja wzajemności Andrzeja Rusława Nowickiego