Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 3

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  pusty grób
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
The subject of this work is a comparative analysis of two John's pericopes, namely the description of the sign at the wedding at Cana (2:1–12) and the story about the empty grave of Jesus, found in the morning of Easter (20:1–18). The starting point of our study is the suggestion presented by P.F. Ellis, that the literary structure of the Fourth Gospel is based on parallelisms. According to this concept, The Book of John was created on the basis of the laws of parallelism known in the ancient world, and not, as many commentators would like to see it, of the laws of narration. The author divides The Gospel of John into twenty-one units in a concentric structure of abcb’a’. The centre of the structure is the text 6:16–21. In the parallel scheme presented by Ellis, the unit 2:1–12 is complemented by the unit 20:1-18. The aim of this work is to present some literary as well as theological connections between the indicated texts. They support the view that the text was consciously worded in the above mentioned way and they allow for a more in-depth investigation into the author's idea.
DE
Gegenstand dieser Ausarbeitung war die vergleichende Analyse von zwei johanneischen Perikopen, nämlich der Beschreibung des Zeichens bei der Hochzeit zu Kana (2,1–12) und der Auffindung des leeren Grabes Jesu am Ostermorgen (20,1–18). Die Forschungen wurden unter Berücksichtigung des Vorschlages von P.F. Ellis durchgeführt, der sich auf die literarische Struktur des vierten Evangeliums auf Basis des parallelen Systems bezieht. Der Exeget teilt das Buch Johannes in 21 konzentrische Abschnitte auf nach der Formel:abcb’a’. Das Zentrum der Struktur bildet die Einheit von Joh 6,16–21 und der Text 2,1–12 ist mit 20,1–18 parallel. Unser Ziel war es, die literarischen und theologischen Zussamenhänge zwischen den beiden angegebenen Texten nachzuweisen. Sie bestätigen die bewusste Absicht des Autors des Evangeliums und ermöglichen, einen tieferen Einblick in seine Gedanken zu bekommen.
Verbum Vitae
|
2009
|
vol. 15
189-208
PL
Le ricostruzioni della storia delle tradizioni sulla tomba e sulle apparizioni del Risorto si basano sull’approccio diacronico. L’articolo non respinge questo tipo d’analisi, ma cerca di precisare il rapporto fra la forma letteraria dei testi e la prospettiva teologica del Vangelo di Marco. Soltanto a partire dalla determinazione di questo rapporto si può adeguatamente cogliere il significato delle divergenze tra le versioni sinottiche come testimonianze degli incontri con il Risorto. I risultati dell’analisi sincronica possono offrire un solido punto di partenza per le indagini diacroniche.
EN
The article shows the resurrection of Jesus Christ and its credibility in the light of the New Testament. Presents early Christian understanding of the resurrection present in the creeds, hymns and liturgical catechesis Paschal. Signs of resurrection: the empty tomb and the Easter revelation of Christ are its credibility. While presented gi s of the Risen Lord are - permanently adjusting to the life Ecclesia − confirmation of the credibility of resurrection.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.