Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 8

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  science studies
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
PL
Bogusław Śliwerski, Extirpation of the scholarly profession in pedagogy.Interdisciplinary Contexts of Special Pedagogy, no. 25, Poznań 2019. Pp. 13-31.Adam Mickiewicz University Press. ISSN 2300-391X. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14746/ikps.2019.25.01. In the article I am dealing with the issue of unscientific depreciation of pedagogy as a science, which manifests itself either in the lack of reliable scientific criticism of dissertations in this discipline or the escape of some educators into politics to implement their own social intervention projects. The dispute about the scientific nature of pedagogy arises from various research traditions, scientific schools, so the author presents several such methodological approaches, whose creators emphasize the criteria of scientificity and indicate the resulting limitations and their incomparability. Meanwhile, self-awareness of the academic criteria of pedagogy is important in the way of reviewing the scientific achievements of young academic staff. Based on reviews in post-habilitation proceedings, I present various types of arguments in favor of the unscientific status of someone’s research and the reaction of those whose publications are reviewed
EN
Bogusław Śliwerski, Extirpation of the scholarly profession in pedagogy.Interdisciplinary Contexts of Special Pedagogy, no. 25, Poznań 2019. Pp. 13-31.Adam Mickiewicz University Press. ISSN 2300-391X. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14746/ikps.2019.25.01. In the article I am dealing with the issue of unscientific depreciation of pedagogy as a science, which manifests itself either in the lack of reliable scientific criticism of dissertations in this discipline or the escape of some educators into politics to implement their own social intervention projects. The dispute about the scientific nature of pedagogy arises from various research traditions, scientific schools, so the author presents several such methodological approaches, whose creators emphasize the criteria of scientificity and indicate the resulting limitations and their incomparability. Meanwhile, self-awareness of the academic criteria of pedagogy is important in the way of reviewing the scientific achievements of young academic staff. Based on reviews in post-habilitation proceedings, I present various types of arguments in favor of the unscientific status of someone’s research and the reaction of those whose publications are reviewed.
PL
Artykuł jest oparty na korespondencji między Udo Wid’em i Karin Hofer a Łukaszem Guzkiem i Anką Lesniak. Dotyczy przygotowań do spotkania i konferencji w Dreźnie (Ostrale). Jest to przykład wymiany poglądów i tworzenia teorii w zamkniętej grupie (echo chamber). Jest także przykładem tego, jak w praktyce przebiega produkcja wiedzy w naukach humanistycznych oraz jaka rolę mogą odegrać badania artystyczne. Tak więc nowa dyscyplina Art(istic) research wykorzystuje metody artystyczne do tworzenia wiedzy o świecie, podczas gdy przyszłe ArtStudies prawdopodobnie będą wykorzystywać metody epistemiczne do tworzenia wiedzy o sztuce. Oba mogą się uzupełniać.
EN
The article is based on the correspondence between Udo Wid and Karin Hofer and Łukasz Guzek and Anka Lesniak. Concerns preparations for meetings and conferences in Dresden (Ostrale). This is an example of exchanging views and creating theories in a closed group (echo chamber). It is also an example of how the production of knowledge in the humanities works in practice and what role artistic research can play. So the new discipline of Art (istic) Research uses artistic methods to produce knowledge about the world, while future ArtStudies will probably use epistemic methods to produce knowledge about art. Both perhaps will complement each other.
Organon
|
2015
|
vol. 47
147-237
EN
The article sketches the history of naukoznawstwo (literally meaning the science connoisseurship or the science of science or science studies) in Poland from the 1910s to the end of the Cold War (1991), and the recovery of full political independence in 1993. It outlines the changing research perspectives of this interdisciplinary field of knowledge in Poland against a background of changing political conditions caused by the reconfigurations of the political order. The first part of the article concerns the period from the 1910s, when Poland was occupied by Russia, Prussia, and Austria, through the regaining of independence by Poland in 1918, the reconstruction of the state in 1918–1939; the second part – World War II; the third part – the period from the initial period of Soviet dominance (1944–1954) in Poland and simultaneously the beginnings of the Cold War (1947–1954), the period 1955–1956 (when the Polish state was liberated from Sovietization), through the different political crises in October 1956, March 1968, December 1970, and June 1976, to the emergence of the Independent Self–governing Trade Union Solidarity in September 1980, the end of the Cold War (1991), and the recovery of full political independence in 1993. The article outlines the fundamental achievements of prominent Polish scholars (among others K. Twardowski, M. Ossowska, S. Ossowski, T. Kotarbiński, K. Ajdukiewicz, S. Michalski, F. Znaniecki, B. Suchodolski, L. Fleck, M. Choynowski, Z. Modzelewski, S. Amsterdamski), politicians (among others B. Bierut, E. Krasowska), politicians and scholars (H. Jabłoński, S. Kulczyński), as well as committees (among others the Academic Section of the Józef Mianowski Fund, The Science of Science Committee of the Polish Academy of Sciences), schools of thought (among others the Lvov–Warsaw School of Philosophy), and academic units (among others the Science of Science Seminar in Kraków, the Department for the History of Science and Technology of the Polish Academy of Sciences, and The Department of Praxeology and Science of Science at the Institute for the Philosophy and Sociology of the Polish Academy of Sciences).
PL
Kształcenie dziennikarzy i ludzi mediów ma istotny wpływ na system medialny, a także pośrednio wpływa na system polityczny. Polskie badania medioznawcze nie ograniczają się jedynie do współpracy instytucjonalnej i udziału w konferencjach – ich efektem są m.in. publikacje na łamach czasopism naukowych oraz tworzenie międzynarodowych zespołów badawczych. Wielu polskich uczonych pracuje w zagranicznych ośrodkach uniwersyteckich. Efekty tych badań są uzależnione od wielkości środków kierowanych na naukę, a ponieważ są one niewystarczające, dlatego niezbędna jest koordynacja badań i wyznaczenie ich najważniejszych kierunków.
EN
Educating journalists and media workers has a significant influence on the media and political system. Polish media studies’ research is not restricted merely to institutional cooperation and participation in conferences but also takes form of scientifi c publications and the existence international research teams. Many Polish scholars work at foreign universities. Effects of the research depend on the funds directed towards science. These funds are scant, therefore coordination of research and setting its most important directions becomes essential.
EN
The text comes from Bruno Latour’s Pandora’s Hope and is large part of its chapter one. It starts with a famous question addressed to Latour by a scientist “do you believe in reality?” It marks the starting point of the investigation of the role of science studies, their work, and the way they account science, and way they are attacked do fi ercely by so called “science warriors”. Science studies are viewed as critical towards well known model of two cultures. Instead they offer another model – one situating science deeply in the heart of collective life
EN
The author, inspired by Stefan Zamecki’s autobiography: Życie wśród innych [Life among Others] and the life-path of this scholar, reflects on Polish historiography of science. These deliberations are not free from personal notes and associations referring to the figures of Polish historiography of science and the hero of the analysed book. Jaromir Jeszke uses here a flexible formula of Reflections on the margins of... From the theoretical perspective of the history of science, the author finds the following fields of Stefan Zamecki’s activity particularly inspiring: 1) his attempts to introduce – and consistently use in his works – the concept of ‘science’ and its subdisciplines, e.g. ‘chemistry’; 2) organising and conducting (together with Prof. Alina Motycka, philosopher from the Institute of Philosophy and Sociology of the Polish Academy of Sciences) a nationwide seminar: ‘Context of discovery in the history of the field of science’, which was held from the mid-1990s to 2002; 3) his scientific vision of the history of science together with its organizational location among sciences on science; 4) his analytical studies on a scientific journal with a century-old tradition: Nauka Polska. Jej Potrzeby, Organizacja i Rozwój [Polish Science. Needs, Organization and Development]. Stefan Zamecki appears to the author as a critical, skeptical and aloof scholar who walked into the history of science through studies on chemistry and philosophy. This experience has shaped his theoretical, ‘boundary’, not always accepted, but inspirational attitudes.
EN
Science studies as a pragmatic epistemology is, from the methodological perspective, a practical discipline, for which design is the characteristic feature. The Tadeusz Kotarbiński approach of the issue is reviewed in the paper.
PL
Naukoznawstwo jako epistemologia pragmatyczna, jest z metodologicznej perspektywy dyscypliną praktyczna, której wyróżnikiem jest projektowanie. W artykule przypomniano ujęcie zagadnienia przez Tadeusza Kotarbińskiego.
EN
While making a comparison between librarianship and other professions one may conclude that the former has been more and more laden with new responsibilities and new priorities. Though the librarian as the “knowledge physician” was a construct that underlined the need for the prestige and social standing of the profession, rather than focused on the essence of the librarian profession, the idea of quasi medical role of the librarian and nearly doctor-like responsibility for the patient/user can have indeed something to do with today’s need for implementing the so-called “curated” processes, that is the ones that require a particularly insightful and extensive knowledge of the subject and available methods of management. And this applies to all possible areas related to the circulation of information. Within the context of two case examples of complex and complicated scientific texts and an attempt to identify how a public discussion on them can be carried out, this article attempts to identify the key points in which, without the mediation of the librarian, science can generate a string of misunderstandings, fallacies and conceptual incoherencies or become marginalised. In conclusion, the author proposes to strengthen personnel training, policy support, to create an innovative environment, and promote the development of awareness of any possible manifestations of librarian curatorship in a variety of activities that might be undertaken by librarians. Further strengthening of research and knowledge competences of librarians seems inevitable, in particular in view of the need for the development of inter-disciplinary sciences and a particular supervision needed for research conducted by multi-person research teams as well as for collectively written texts authored by a number of researchers.
PL
Z porównań bibliotekarstwa z innymi zawodami wynika odkrywanie w nim jego nowych cech i zadań. Choć „lekarz wiedzy” był koncepcją mówiącą raczej o potrzebie prestiżu i pozycji społecznej niż o istocie zawodu bibliotekarza, idee lekarskich możliwości działania i lekarskiej odpowiedzialności za pacjenta mogą mieć coś wspólnego ze współczesną potrzebą wdrażania procesów „kuratorowanych”, to znaczy wymagających wyjątkowo wnikliwej znajomości przedmiotu i zróżnicowanych metod zarządzania. Dotyczy to wszelkich pól związanych z obiegiem informacji. Za pomocą dwóch dobranych dla przykładu, skomplikowanych tekstów naukowych i wskazaniu, jak może odbywać się wokół nich publiczna dyskusja, w artykule próbuję rozpoznać kluczowe punkty, w których bez mediacji bibliotekarza nauka może generować nieporozumienia lub ulegać marginalizacji. Proponuję też dostrzegać przejawy kuratorowania w różnych działaniach podejmowanych już przez bibliotekarzy. Tekst jest wezwaniem do wzmocnienia naukoznawczych kompetencji bibliotekarzy, szczególnie ze względu na potrzebę rozwijania nauki interdyscyplinarnej i sprawowania opieki nad badaniami, prowadzonymi przez wieloosobowe zespoły, oraz nad tekstami pisanymi zbiorowo przez kilku autorów.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.