Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 2

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  sobór watykański II
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
The issue of social education has an important place in the teaching of the Church. In the pronouncements of the II Vatican Council the need for the formation of the basis of the constructive and responsible participation of children in social life has been noted. Such directions of education have been developed in the teaching after the Council. Even more strongly has it been underlined that the integral education of man demands formation towards the essential values of human life and a gradual introduction of children to responsibility for the formation of the civilization of love in the contemporary world.A large part of the pronouncements of the Church and of the Popes must be seen as the reaction to the changes taking place in the world. But, independently from the period of history, the Church has always underlined the irreplaceable and primary role of the family in the personal-social education of the child.
Vox Patrum
|
2021
|
vol. 80
329-348
EN
In 1962, during the first session of Vatican II, it was decided by a small number of votes that the teaching regarding the Mother of the Lord should be placed in the constitution onthe Church. Basil Christopher Butler (1902-1986), a Benedictine abbot from England, was one of those who prepared the draft for the Mariological document. He received support from the English episcopate. Christopher Butler showed, through biblical and above all patristic sources, that the Mother of Christ ought to be seen in the perspective of salvation history. His patristic concept depended upon the ancient figure of the new Eve, who stands as the model of the Church. He pointed to many writings of the Church Fathers. They were used in the eighth chapter of Lumen Gentium. Meanwhile, in the first council drafts on Mary, there were few patristic references. Worthy of attention is that Christopher Butler used the writings of J.H. Newman. Like him, he left Anglicanism for Catholicism. The patristic tradition of Anglicanism from the 19th and the beginning of the 20th centuries gave sufficient theological arguments that the Mother of God ought not be isolated from the teaching on the Church.
PL
Podczas pierwszej sesji Soboru Watykańskiego II w 1962 roku rozstrzygnięto niewielką liczbą głosów, że nauka o Matce Pana zostanie zamieszczona w konstytucji o Kościele. Basil Christopher Butler (1902 – 1986), opat benedyktyński Anglii był jednym z tych, którzy przygotowali projekt dokumentu mariologicznego. Otrzymał on poparcie episkopatu angielskiego. Ch. Butler wykazał w oparciu o dane biblijne i nade wszystko patrystyczne, że Matkę Chrystusa należy ukazywać w perspektywie historii zbawienia. Jego koncept patrystyczny został oparty na starożytnej figurze nowej Ewy, która stanowi pierwowzór Kościoła. Wskazał wiele pism ojców Kościoła. Zostały one wykorzystane w ósmy rozdziale Lumen gentium. Tymczasem we wstępnych projektach mariologii soborowej były nieliczne odniesienia patrystyczne. Należy zauważyć, że Ch. Butler skorzystał z pism J. H. Newmana. Podobnie jak on przeszedł z anglikanizmu na katolicyzm. Tradycja patrystyczna anglikanizmu XIX i początku XX wieku podawała wystarczająco dużo argumentów teologicznych, aby Bogurodzicy nie izolować z wykładu o Kościele.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.