Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 2

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  sociology of city
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
The article explores social relations between festivals, consumption, and urban spaces. The study deals with two city festivals, Sea Festival and International Short Film Festival Tinklai, in post-Soviet city Klaipeda, Lithuania, over the period of 1991–2010, and impact of consumption on the geography of festivals’ locations within the city. We argue that modern festivals gradually move to those urban spaces which lost their functionality and can be easily transformed into temporary places of controlled consumption. Festivals set urban spaces for new sociality of emotional community, while physical arrangements of festival territories reproduce more general patterns of social distinctions and hierarchies. Methodological assumptions of the study come from Bourdieu’s typology of taste, De Certeau’s idea of urban space signification practices, and H. Lefebvre’s theory of urban space production.
PL
Niniejszy artykuł podejmuje próbę rozważenia perspektywy teoretycznej znanej jako socjologia architektury w kontekście kategorii krajobrazu kulturowego miasta. W tym celu autorka poddaje analizie podejście, problematykę oraz praktykę badawczą związaną z socjologią architektury, by następnie odnieść je do możliwości wykorzystania w badaniach przyjmujących kategorię krajobrazu kulturowego jako centralną kategorię analizy. Końcowe pytanie o to, komu (socjologowi? architektowi? mieszkańcom?) przypisuje się kompetencje w orzekaniu o współkonstytuowaniu świata społecznego przez architekturę, pozostaje nierozstrzygnięte.
EN
This article considers theoretical prospect perspective? known as sociology of architecture and its links to the category of cultural landscape of a city. The author analyses the approach, the problems as well as the research praxis of the sociology of architecture, and discusses the variety of opportunities of using them in research focused on the category of cultural landscape. The final question: who (a researcher? an architect? anybody living in the city?) can be seen as competent to express opinions about the co-aging of the architecture in the social world, has not been answered.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.