Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 7

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  subject of research
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
Although the second half of the 20th century is the period of development of economic geography in Poland, in the first post-war decades geography of construction did not function as a separate geographical subdivision. More significant development of spatial research in this field was brought about a quarter of a century ago. In the article devoted to the problems of geography of construction in Poland, the subject scope, main directions of research and the achievements of this sub-discipline are discussed. Geography of construction is a branch of economic geography, which examines spatial aspects of construction and assembly ‘production’, with special attention to spatial organisation of investment processes, as well as conditions and effects of location and spatial structure of construction investments. The literature review allows for isolating the main directions, among which the following can be listed: conditions for the development of construction of different functions, also in the context of the accompanying phenomena (e.g. in the social sphere), location factors and effects of construction investments, as well as research devoted to the spatial structure of construction projects and their links with geographical environment. Research topics of geography of construction are part of the spatial processes within the interests of other geographic sub-disciplines, as well as of related social, economic and even technical disciplines. The achievements of Polish geography of construction of the last quarter of a century are important from the point of view of a better recognition of the conditions and course of the socio-economic transformation in Poland in different contexts and different spatial scales.
EN
Despite more than a century of history of psychological research on education, we are unable to clearly define the subject and specific tasks and goals of educational psychology as a separate subdiscipline. There is also the lack of one, general and comprehensive psychological theory of education, describing and explaining in a satisfactory way the complexity of educational phenomena. The presented considerations leads to the statement that educational psychology is an area of application rather than a unique category of research subject matter.
3
100%
EN
The specificity of the 21st century filled with economic and social problems, acts of terror as well as armed conflicts downrightly necessitates undertaking the research in the field of security sciences. However, each time defining a subject of scientific research is of the utmost importance in order to systemize research works and mainly concretize interests. Such the aim was chosen by the author of the current article who, while presenting the orientations of individual scientific theoreticians and researchers dealing with security issues, answers the subject matter question: What does constitute the subject of the research in security sciences? The author’s inquiries were preceded by the explanation of the types of security and its scope within individual cases, which includes the essence of national and international security. In the further part of the article the author’s attention was focused on the sphere of methodology in security sciences. The author notices that the subject of research in the security science is of multidimensional character hence explanation, description, analyzing, assessing and forecasting the consequences of ongoing processes and events in the security sphere, together with initiation of activities which serve for ensuring security, require applying the knowledge from various scientific disciplines, domains and fields. In the following part of the article the attempt to define the subject of research in security sciences and drawing the conclusions within that field was undertaken. The author cites the orientations by A. Dawidczyk and T. Jemiolo according to whom the subject of research in security sciences is defined as the threat coming from human surroundings and all the activities aiming at ensuring and maintaining security for a man. The article is summarized by the conclusions where it was determined that in security sciences, the security, its components, ratio, level and relations with respect to the subject of research are studied.
EN
This paper’s concern is the need to construct didactic theories in the aspect of the development of general didactics. The author performs an analysis of the various ways the term ‘theory’ is understood in the many field of scientific inquiry. What follows is a discussion of the problems of scientific cognition, researcher’s methodological awareness, as well as the models of pedagogy: the scientist, hermeneutic and praxeological models. Finally, the author draws attention to the sources of researcher’s expectations, axiological dilemmas in pedagogical research and potential conflicts of values.
EN
The aim of this article is to look at the analyses of the body/corporeality carried out by Polish sociologists and at the currently pursued studies in the area. The article presents the dilemmas that the researcher of the body/corporeality faces, mainly due to the nature of the research object, but also resulting from associated methodological difficulties. Secondly, the paper also points at some important empirical omissions – that is, areas or methods of research that have not, so far, gained enough attention of the researchers. Thirdly, a list of recommendations for possible, potentially attractive new fields of exploration for the sociology of the body is presented.
EN
The issues raised in the article are an attempt to identify some sources of difficulty in defining the subject of research of pedagogy and to review the voices in the scientific and research discourse in terms of proposals for resolving this problem and methodological trends related to it. The considerations include issues of the interdisciplinary nature of pedagogy, its difficult relations with other sciences, the internal dispersion into many subdisciplines and a non-ordinated conceptual system, as well as discrepancies between theory and pedagogical practice. The author also includes the multi-paradigmatic, contextual and dynamic character of modern pedagogy among potential factors determining the way of thinking about its subject of research.
PL
Podjęte w artykule zagadnienia stanowią próbę zidentyfikowania niektórych źródeł trudności w określaniu zakresu przedmiotowego pedagogiki oraz dokonania przeglądu głosów w dyskursie naukowo-badawczym pod kątem propozycji rozstrzygania tego problemu i tendencji metodologicznych z nim związanych. Rozważania obejmują kwestie interdyscyplinarnego charakteru pedagogiki, jej złożonych relacji z innymi dyscyplinami naukowymi, wewnętrznego rozproszenia dyscypliny na wiele subdyscyplin i nieujednoliconego systemu pojęciowego, a także rozbieżności między teorią i praktyką pedagogiczną. Do potencjalnych czynników warunkujących sposób myślenia o granicach poznania pedagogicznego autorka zalicza także wieloparadygmatyczność, kontekstualność i dynamiczny charakter współczesnej nauki.
Forum Pedagogiczne
|
2018
|
vol. 8
|
issue 1
105-118
EN
Referring to the current status of knowledge in the field of pedagogics and related sciences (especially philosophy, psychology, medicine, political sciences, theology), the author emphasizes the significance of interdisciplinary category of care (and semantically related terms such as “concern”, “taking care”, “consideration”, “thoughtfulness”) for the development of general pedagogics as a pedagogical sub-discipline. Apart from explaining the lexical differences and indicating differences between the aforementioned terms, the author also analyzes the scientific understanding of care (as, among others: a moral norm and obligation, social interaction, disposition, attitude) and the relationship between care and other moral qualities. The author also shows the conditions of the process of upbringing a thoughtful human being and stages of interiorization of the analyzed quality. Hermeneutic methods seem justified in order to comprehensively cognize the quality of care.
PL
Odwołując się do dotychczasowego stanu wiedzy z zakresu pedagogiki i nauk pokrewnych (zwłaszcza filozofii, psychologii, medycyny, politologii, teologii), w treści artykułu autorka zaakcentowała znaczenie interdyscyplinarnej kategorii troski (oraz terminów zbliżonych semantycznie, takich jak: „zatroskanie”, „troszczenie się”, „zatroszczenie się”, „troskliwość”) w rozwoju subdyscypliny pedagogicznej – pedagogiki ogólnej. Oprócz wyjaśnień leksykalnych prowadzących do wykazania różnic między wskazanymi terminami, przeanalizowała naukowe ujęcie troski (jako m.in.: normy i powinności moralnej, relacji społecznej, dyspozycji, postawy) oraz powiązania troski z innymi wartościami moralnymi. Autorka ukazała jednocześnie uwarunkowania procesu wychowania człowieka troskliwego oraz etapy interioryzacji analizowanej wartości. Posłużenie się metodami hermeneutycznymi oraz analizą logiczną i argumentacją w badaniu problematyki troski wydaje się uzasadnione, biorąc pod uwagę konieczność jej pogłębionego poznania.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.