Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 4

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  survey methodology
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
The paper concerns the problem of estimating population parameters for repeated rotating surveys. Coefficients required for theoretical BLUE estimator for rotating surveys are for actual real surveys usually not known. There are no theoretical papers relating to this problem. It is therefore necessary to conduct suitable simulation studies. Broad simulation analyses conducted in the paper are carried out on the basis of two populations: generated from a multivariate normal distribution and based on real data derived from agricultural censuses.
EN
The fundamental principle of meaningful comparative analysis of corruption featuring cross-national survey data is that countries are equally represented across time. Yet, since 1989, this principle has been consistently violated. This article examines (a) the extent to which country coverage is uneven in 45 European countries in cross-national survey projects with items on corruption during 1989-2017 and (b) the dynamics of the change of inequalities in country representation. I examined a total of 89 survey waves of 21 international survey projects, including the Eurobarometer, the European Social Survey, the International Social Survey Program, the World Values Survey, and others. The results show that the differences in representation between European countries are systematic, significant, and rising. The Post-Soviet country group is particularly underrepresented both in specialized surveys on corruption and in general surveys with corruption items.
3
88%
EN
The aim of a sample survey is to obtain high quality estimates of population parameters with low cost. The expected precision of estimates and the expected data collection cost are usually unknown making the choice of sampling design a complicated task. Analytical methods can not be used often because of the complexity of the sampling design or data collection process. The aim of this paper is to develop a mathematical framework to compare chosen sampling designs with respect to the expected precision of estimates and the data collection cost. As a result a framework is developed which employs artificial population data generation, survey sampling techniques, survey cost modelling, Monte Carlo simulation experiments and other techniques. The framework is applied to analyse the cost efficiency of the sampling design currently used for the Latvian Labour Force Survey.
EN
The article aims to reconstruct the Polish stereotype of a Russian by means of the cognitive definition, whose principal components are predications of the type „Russians drink”, „Russians are brutal”, „Russians are aggressive”, „Russians are musical”, etc. It also aims to capture the mechanisms guiding the functioning of the stereotype in public discourse. A set of about seventy fixed sentences-judgements of this type can be grouped into a few categories (syndromes): „the Russian soul”, „a brother Slav”, an aggressor and enemy, „a master and slave” (i.e. someone despotic and enslaved at the same time), „an Asian”, someone with a specific and rich cultural background, a marketplace trader. At the level of contemporary public discourse the categories give rise to profiles, i.e. functional stereotypical variants whose creator is always a sociologically and culturally defined subject, e.g. a Pole — simple person, a Polish patriot, a member of the Polish intelligentsia with European horizons, a young pragmatist. The base set of features attributed to Russians by Poles is established on the basis of three types of linguistic data: systemic (ethnonyms and their derivatives, phraseological units and collocations), experimental (questionnaires conducted according to various methods among Lublin students in the period 1990-2000) and textual.
PL
Autorzy rekonstruują polski stereotyp językowy Rosjanina, stosując metodę definicji kognitywnej, której podstawową jednostką są predykacje typu: „Rosjanie piją”, „są brutalni”, „agresywni”, „muzykalni” itp., a w kolejności zmierzają do uchwycenia mechanizmów rządzących funkcjonowaniem stereotypu w dyskursie publicznym. Zespół takich utartych zdań-sądów liczących około 70 jednostek układa się w kilka wiązek (syndromów) – „rosyjskiej duszy”, „brata Słowianina”, agresora i wroga, „władcy-niewolnika”, tj. człowieka zarazem despotycznego i zniewolonego, „Azjaty”, nosiciela specyficznej i bogatej kultury, handlarza bazarowego. Na poziomie współczesnego dyskursu publicznego z takich wiązek cech budowane są profile, tj. funkcjonalne warianty stereotypu, których kreatorem jest zawsze określony socjologicznie i kulturowo podmiot, np. Polak – prosty człowiek, polski patriota, inteligent o horyzontach europejskich, młody pragmatyk. Bazowy zespół cech przypisywanych przez Polaków Rosjanom autorzy ustalają na podstawie trojakiego typu danych językowych: systemowych (etnonim i tworzone od niego derywaty, frazeologizmy i kolokacje), eksperymentalnych (tj. wynikach badań ankietowych prowadzonych różnymi metodami w latach 1990–2000 w środowisku studenckim Lublina) oraz tekstowych.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.