Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 32

first rewind previous Page / 2 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  zgoda małżeńska
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 2 next fast forward last
Ius Matrimoniale
|
1999
|
vol. 10
|
issue 4
7-28
EN
Sullo sfondo delle note Allocuzioni di Giovanni Paolo II alla Rota Romana negli anni 1987 e 1988, in cui uno dei temi centrali è stata la questione dei presupposti antropologici come elemento indispensabile di un retto dialogo fra il giudicee i periti psicologi - psichiatri, L'A. ha delineato nell’introduzione l'oggetto dello studio, relativo alla questione di rilevanza (o meno) della visione antropologica del matrimonio all’interno del sistema del diritto canonico. Più precisamente, venne posta la questione fino a che punto gli elementi antropologici, formulati anche nella cost. Gaudium et spes, possano avere incidenza nei processi di nullità matrimoniale. Nella prima parte dell’articolo viene segnalata la difficoltà metodologica nella determinazione dei contenuti antropologici, validi nella materia dei consenso matrimoniale. L'A. cerca di individuare i criteri formali, validi per una cernita dei contenuti elaborati nelle differenti antropologie (filosofica, teologica), con particolare indicazione del metodo trascendentale di Lonergan, adoperato da L. M. Rulla nella costruzione di una antropologia interdisciplinare. Nella seconda parte L'А. segnala la presenza degli elementi di natura antropologica all’interno di alcuni canoni del De matrimonio del CIC (in particolare nei cann. 1055 § 1, 1057 § 2) e quindi cerca di precisare la loro funzione nel testo legislativo tenendo soprattutto conto di due elementi caratteristici della legge canonica, ossia della sua finalità specifca e obbligatorietà. La terza parte affronta direttamente il problema. L’esposizione è svolta attomo alle seguenti questioni specifiche: a) la relazione fra il ≪ foedus≫ e ≪ contractus≫. L’ A. accetta il concetto del matrimonio integralmente inteso (foedus), tuttavia la struttura giuridica del matrimonio viene definita in sintonia con la teoria contrattualistica; b) la validita (о nullità ) del consenso matrimoniale come categoria giuridica; c) la funzione delle presunzioni che stanno alla base del CIC nella materia matrimoniale e in particolare delle presunzioni dette hominis formulate dal giudice. Mentre le prime considerano la nullità del matrimonio come eccezione, le altre sono soggette ad un’evoluzione giurispmdenziale, rispecchiando la realtà umana concreta; d) l’antropologia è la norma applicata nel foro canonico. In primo luogo l'A. Fa presente che l’interpretazione della legge a modo di sentenza giudiziale deve tener conto del fatto che le esigenze antropologiche non sono esterne alla legge in quanto per opera della revisione del CIC sono calate nelle nuove norme, sia di diritto sostantivo che processuale. D’altro canto il giudice ecclesiastico, per poter correttamente applicare il diritto, non può non condividere quella visione antropologica del matrimonio che ha il Legislatore. In questo modo è stato posto sia il problema degli elementi antropologici esistenti all’interno del sistema del diritto matrimoniale canonico, come la susseguente „canonizzazione” legislativa delle constatazioni antropologiche. Di conseguenza l'А. ha cercato di determinare quanto quegli elementi siano rilevanti in materia di eventuale nullità del consenso matrimoniale. La proposta soluzione ridimensiona il problema, risolvendolo piuttosto nel campo dell’ interpretazione della legge, ma ammette pure la legittimita di una valenza diretta, bensi secondaria, delle esigenze di natura antropologica.
Ius Matrimoniale
|
2015
|
vol. 26
|
issue 1
39-58
EN
The problem of the marriage essence, considered in close connection with matrimonial consent, without a doubt constitutes a difficult challenge for the jurisprudence in the field of matrimonial law. The question: what is marriage, what is the identity of marriage, in other words its essence, which arose at different stages of development of canon law, revived after the Second Vatican Council, which presented a partnership of life and love established by man and woman through a “matrimonial covenant of irrevocable personal consent” in a new light.Deep reflection on marriage as an institution of natural law orders, in search of its essence, to refer first of all to the natural dimension of the unity of two people in a complementary dimension of their masculinity and femininity, in other words in “their natures”. It is about the relationship of two people based on their personal esse, whose action constitutes an existential development. Significant legal nature of this relationship is based on the existence of una caro, unity “in the natures”, which is materialised through their knot of justice.When moving from possibilities to action, an indispensable factor is matrimonial consent of the parties indicating unity of two acts of will made with the same intentionality, resulting in a conjugal relationship.
Ius Matrimoniale
|
2015
|
vol. 26
|
issue 2
45-60
EN
The question about the consensual ability, especially its minimum, has been visible in the doctrine of canonical marital law in the period preceding the CIC from 1983. To specify who is able to enter into marriage, the fundamental criterion is the proper understanding of the very marital reality.Regarding the vision of consensual ability, related strictly to the perception of marriage and its very nature, in the considered period special attention needs to be paid to the doctrine of a prominent modern Spanish canonist and philosopher J. Hervada. Its legitimacy can be vividly seen against the background of other theories, whose main representatives, although presenting different opinions (although having a lot in common)  are, inter alia, P. Gasparri and J. R. Keating.Gasparri’s concept of marriage is a contract (matrimonium in fieri), which is the fountain of the relationship of mutual justice between spouses. Keating, however, strives to integrate the perception of marriage in fieri with the marriage in facto esse. The marital ability would not only be the ability to the act of marital congruence, but also the ability to live in marriage.According to Hervada, the essence of marriage in facto esse is the legal bond being “unity in natures” prior to any action of the married couple as such. The mentioned canonist attaches significant importance to the capacitas underlining that it should be referred to the act of entering into marriage, it is about the ability to undertake this act not about the ability ad statum coniugalem. He opines that the causes of incapacitas treated in reference to this unity of spouses may cause the invalidity of marriage only if they stand in the way of “unity in natures”.
EN
Matrimonial consent constitutes a marriage-forming element in Polish family law as well as in canon marriage law. A constitutive nature of this consent, i.e. a consent that creates a marital relationship, makes it a legal phenomenon in these two legal systems. Canon martial consent shows a number of common characteristics with a declaration of marriage in Polish family law. Both of these systems have been correlated for ages. Now, however, they operate in parallel in relation to Polish Roman Catholic citizens. The shape of a Polish legal regulation is a esult of a long-time evolution influenced undoubtedly by canon marriage law. The aim of the article is to compare a legal structure of contracting a marriage in Polish family law and in canon marriage law as well as to establish their legal nature.
Prawo Kanoniczne
|
2015
|
vol. 58
|
issue 2
31-45
EN
Taking up the issue of depresion as a cause for declaring a marriage null and voit, the author begins his reections with a look at psychosis. From the point of view of marriage validity, of special signicance is also the analysis of depresion with very particular medical aspects. e cause of nullity of a marriage discussed here, in turn, requires a rather precise denition of depresion and the factors by which it may be triggered. e last part of the author’s reections is devoted to the analysis of canon 1095 of the Code of Canon Law, especially to the denition of cases when this depresion is serious enough to exclude marriage validity. 
Ius Matrimoniale
|
2017
|
vol. 28
|
issue 3
5-16
EN
The analyses of the current legal order show that for a marriage to become contracted validly the contracting parties need to be present together or may enter into marriage by proxy (proxies). Naturally, for a marriage to be valid it is insufficient to express matrimonial consent in the internal sphere only; it is necessary to externalize the consent with the aim of its social verification45 but also because of the dignity of the other party to whom a nupturient is willing to give himself. Canonists agree that according to the natural law matrimonial consent in its external sphere could be expressed in any possible way. However, in the ecclesiastical order the legislator did not allow this kind of latitude and specified the forms of expression of matrimonial consent (as discussed in can. 1104 § 1-2 CIC). In an ordinary situation, if both nupturients can speak, they should contract a marriage in words although meeting this requirement is not necessary for the validity but rather for the fairness of the act. However, in extraordinary conditions, when at least one person cannot speak, it is possible to express one’s consent through equivalent signs. Silence nonetheless does not meet the criteria discussed here since in this hypothesis one’s will remains inertial and, as a result, a legal act does not attain effectivity in the system.
Ius Matrimoniale
|
2010
|
vol. 21
|
issue 15
69-84
EN
The author in the present article focused on a very specific problem of the need the renewal of marriage vows in the case of annulment caused by an annulling obstacle The main aim of the author was to present the legal arguments resulting from the disposition included in canon 1156 § 2. According to the analyses carried out, the legislator introduced this solution in order to strongly object to the validation of marriage on the strength of the law alone. Moreover, the author believes that the necessity for marriage vows renewal was introduced with a view to calming the conscience of the parties involved.
Ius Matrimoniale
|
2016
|
vol. 27
|
issue 3
93-109
EN
The case Mediolanen vs. A. Ciani concerns the marriage between Adelmus and Aida, concluded on 18 August 1983, a mere four months after the couple met. The conjugal life, in which two children were born, lasted approximately eight years. Because of Adelmus’s behaviour, marriage faced problems from the very beginning. After numerous misunderstandings, the man became involved in an extra-marital relationship, as a result of which Aida requested separation.On 3 July 2003 Adelmus petitioned the Tribunal of First Instance to have the marriage declared null and void on the ground of the exclusion of the indissolubility of marriage. On 31 March 2005 the Tribunal handed down a negative sentence. After logging an appeal to the Tribunal of Second instance and supplementing instructions carefully, this decision was reversed on 27 October 2005 and the case was sent to the Roman Rota (third instance). On 18 February 2008 a positive sentence was handed down, declaring the marriage null and void. The author presents and provides a comment on the sentence of theRoman Rota, drawing attention to proving simulation.
Ius Matrimoniale
|
2002
|
vol. 13
|
issue 7
67-85
EN
La problematica relativa alla natura in validante del dolo, svolta in questo studio, viene affrontata dal punto di vista storico. Si presenta quindi il cammino fatto nella dottrina canonistica dal Decreto di Graziano fino al CJC dei 1917. Partendo dalle teorie dei decretisti e decretalisti (dolus in spiritualibus; fatuitas decepti), attraverso il pensiero tomista (voluntarium e involuntarium) e il suo influsso sulla dottrina dei canonisti del XVI s., il pensiero teologico - giuridico post-tridentino (Sanchez), la dottrina del XVII e XVIII s. (tra l’altro di s. Alfonso de Liguori) - si arriva al periodo immediatamente anteriore e contemporaneo alia codificazione pio-benedettina. II problema del dolo e della rivelanza da attribuirgli in ambito matrimoniale, presente nella dottrina canonistica dei secoli, non e stato sufficientemente risolto nel CJC dei 1917.
Ius Matrimoniale
|
2011
|
vol. 22
|
issue 16
59-73
EN
The author of the presented article focused on the interpretation of canon can. 1096 §§ 1 -2 CIC. What he pointed out is that canon includes elements essential to knowledge about marriage, necessary to enter into marriage.Raising the issue of the necessity for the contracting parties to obtain knowledge as for the spouse’s own good, the author supported the thesis that this requirement is partially contained in the knowledge of relativity of marital union pointed out by the docrine.As far as future codification is concerned, the author spoke in favor of abolishing the presumption included in canon 1096 § 2 CIC because of the difficulties connected with determining the age og maturity. What he calls for is that in this case reference should be made to the solution codified in Code of Canons of the Eastern Church (ca. 891), in which the legislator did not address the issue leaving it to judges hearing the case to determine the required age of maturity.
EN
Taking up the issue of depresion as a cause for declaring a marriage null and voit, the author begins his reflections with a look at depressive episode. From the point of view of marriage validity, of special significance is also the analysis of depresion with very particular medical aspects. The cause of nullity of a marriage discussed here, in turn, requires a rather precise definition of depresion and the factors by which it may be triggered. The last part of the author’s reflections is devoted to the analysis of canon 1095 of the Code of Canon Law, especially to the definition of cases when this depresion is serious enough to exclude marriage validity.
PL
Zaburzenia depresyjne jako przyczyna niezdolności konsensualnej do zawarcia małżeństwa Akt zgody małżeńskiej, będący aktem ludzkim, wymaga od kontrahenta zdolności konsensualnej, zwanej też zdolnością psychiczną. Chodzi tu o zdolność do powzięcia świadomej, rozważnej i swobodnej decyzji odnoszącej się do zawarcia małżeństwa. W konsekwencji brak tej zdolności oznacza niezdolność naturalną albo inaczej: konsensualną lub psychiczną do zawarcia małżeństwa. Określenie wpływu silnej depresji na niezdolność konsensualną do zawarcia małżeństwa wydaje się najbardziej interesujące z punktu widzenia aktualnej doktryny i orzecznictwa, a więc w odniesieniu do przepisów zawartych w kan. 1095, 2° i 3° Kodeksie Prawa Kanonicznego z 1983 r. Pytanie, które należy jednak postawić, jest następujące: czy każda depresja skutkuje niezdolnością psychiczną do wyrażenia zgody małżeńskiej czy, też jedynie ogranicza tę wolę nie powodując nieważności małżeństwa? Niniejszy artykuł jest próbą odpowiedzi na tak postawione pytanie.
12
51%
EN
The convalidation of marriage in canon law is a process where the invalidly contracted marriage becomes validly contracted in the light of law. The author of this article analyses the notion of the convalidation of the marriage, basing on Polish canon law literature and on opinions of different authors. In canon law there are considerable differences between two kinds of the convalidation: convalidatio simplex and sanatio in radice. In Polish literature there exists only one word denoting these two kinds. This institution is of vital importance in canon law, as it has a legal effect on the marriage, which de facto exists in reality.
PL
Konwalidacja małżeństwa w prawie kanonicznym jest instytucją, procesem, w którym nieważnie zawarte małżeństwo zostaje uważnione w świetle prawa. W niniejszym artykule została podjęta problematyka konwalidacji, zwłaszcza w perspektywie samego nazewnictwa używanego przez autorów polskojęzycznych. Kanwą rozważań stało się rozróżnienie dwóch form konwalidacji, tj. konwalidacji zwykłej i uzdrowienia w zawiązku. W nomenklaturze przyjętej na gruncie polskiej kanonistyki używa się w zasadzie jednego określenia – uważnienie na określenie tych dwóch form, oczywiście przy jednoczesnym ich rozróżnieniu. Konwalidacja ma zasadnicze znaczenie w prawie kanonicznym, ponieważ nadaje skuteczność prawną małżeństwu, które przecież faktycznie istnieje.
EN
The Code of Canon Law of 1983 classifies the reasons for marriage invalidity in three different categories: diriment impediments, defects in matrimonial consent and a lack or a defect of the canon form. In 1101 § 2 the Code of Canon Law enumerates different forms of simulations among different defects in matrimonial consent. Simulation signifies that a person contracting marriage expresses a marital agreement merely on the surface, excluding in reality through a positive act of the will the marriage itself or its essential element or an essential quality of the marriage. The present article is an attempt to look at the relation existing between the validity of marriage and the exclusion of the good of spouses, with the consideration of the object of the simulation form and the ways of delivering proof of it.
PL
Kodeks prawa kanonicznego z 1983 r. definiuje trzy grupy przyczyn stwierdzenia nieważności małżeństwa: przeszkody zrywające, wady zgody małżeńskiej i wady formy kanonicznej. Pośród różnych wad zgody małżeńskiej w kan. 1101 § 2 KPK Prawodawca wymienia różne formy symulacji. Symulacja oznacza, że kontrahent zawiera małżeństwo jedynie zewnętrznie, wykluczając małżeństwo jako takie lub jakiś jego istotny element lub przymiot. Niniejszy artykuł stanowi próbę określenia jednej z form symulacji częściowej, określanej jako wykluczenie dobra małżonków, z uwzględnieniem sposobu jego dowodzenia.
EN
Il principio dei can. 1057 § 1 della insostituibitità del consenso matrimoniale costituisce una peculiare e fondamentale caratteristica del matrimonio canonico, quella che lo differenzia, forse più di ogni altra cosa, dai modelli di matrimonio normalmente diffusi negli ordinamenti giuridici civili. Oltre ad essere necessario ed insostituibile, il consenso matrimoniale è anche sufficiente a costituire il matrimonio. Dopo aver sottolineato il ruolo indefettibile o svolto dal consenso matrimoniale delle parti nella costituzione del matrimonio, il legislatore cerca anche di definire più specificamente la natura (nel can. 1057 § 2) od l’oggetto (nel can. 1057 § 2 e 1055 § 1) dello stesso consenso.
Ius Matrimoniale
|
2016
|
vol. 27
|
issue 4
123-140
EN
The author presents and provides a comment on the final sentence handed down in the third instance (the Roman Rota) in a nullitatis matrimonii case, examined ob simulationem totalem at the complainant’s request (a negative and a positive sentences were handed down in the first and second instance respectively). The key issue in this case was determining whether in the examined case the complainant’s personal goals (fines operantis), namely the desire to improve the economic situation of her and her child, can be combined with the institutional goals of marriage (fines operis). By referring to judicature of the Roman Rota and thoroughly examining the case files, the adjudication panel c. Erlebach ruled that the complainant’s personal goals were consistent with the goals of the institution of marriage and that the woman has not ruled out ipsum matrimonium. Therefore, total simulation of marriage did not happen at the time the marriage was concluded.
Prawo Kanoniczne
|
2016
|
vol. 59
|
issue 3
73-95
EN
Taking up the issue of schizophrenia as a cause for declaring a marriage null and voit, the author begins his reflections with a look at psychosis. From the point of view of marriage validity, of special significance is also the analysis of schizophrenia with very particular medical aspects. The cause of nullity of a marriage discussed here, in turn, requires a rather precise definition of schizophrenia and the factors by which it may be triggered. The last part of the author’s reflections is devoted to the analysis of canon 1095 of the Code of Canon Law, especially to the definition of cases when this schizophrenia is serious enough to exclude marriage validity.
PL
Współczesne orzecznictwo podaje jednoznacznie brzmiącą zasadę, że stwierdzenie w podmiocie obecności schizofrenii nie jest wystarczającym dowodem stwierdzenia jego niezdolności do podjęcia istotnych obowiązków małżeńskich. W tym względzie bowiem konieczne jest nie tylko określenie fazy, w czasie której podmiot zawierał małżeństwo, ale również realny wpływ określonych objawów na podjęcie decyzji małżeńskiej. Orzecznictwo rotalne jest zgodne, że w fazie schizofrenii kwalifikowanej podmiot nie jest zdolny do stworzenia wspólnoty życia małżeńskiego. Kwestia ta, jakkolwiek jednoznacznie brzmiąca wywołuje jednak pewne wątpliwości w odniesieniu do tzw. stanów remisji. Podmiot podejmuje zobowiązanie w momencie wyrażania zgody małżeńskiej, a więc musi mieć należną zdolność do podjęcia obowiązków małżeńskich, ale wypełnienie tychże obowiązków następuje w trakcie trwania małżeństwa. Zatem, jeśli nawet w trakcie trwania małżeństwa będą występować stany remisji, w którym podmiot będzie w stanie w miarę normalnie funkcjonować, nie oznacza to, że jest w stanie się zobowiązać do takiego normalnego funkcjonowania. Nie można bowiem podjąć się zobowiązania, którego nie będzie można wypełnić.
Ius Matrimoniale
|
2002
|
vol. 13
|
issue 7
199-205
EN
L’autore e commenta il contenuto della sentenza rotale pro nullitate emanata dal tito del can. 1095, n. 3 CIC. La concezione dei matrimonio come communità di vita tra i coniugi ha condotto ad applicare questa figura di incapacità anche all’ipotesi di satirismo, cioè una difunzione che provoca la continua insoddisfazione sessuale. Il noto uditore ha sotto lineato si tratta di incapacità ad a ssumere il oggetto dei consenso. In effetti il satirismo non consentendo l’instaurazione della communità di vita e amore coniugale che constituisce la sostaza dell’istituto matrimoniale vienne, può produrre nel soggetto una vera incapacità.
PL
Trybunał Roty Rzymskiej, w publikowanych wyrokach dotyczących symulacji całkowitej zgody małżeńskiej łączy ją w tym samym podmiocie z innymi tytułami nieważności małzeństwa w obrębie zgody małżeńskiej. Trzeba wyraźnie zaznaczyć, że symulacja całkowita zgody małżeńskiej pozwala się odróżnić od innych tytułów nieważności małżeństwa w obrębie zgody gdyż w symulacji kontrahent wyraźnie nie chce małżeństwa. W innych zaś tytułach nieważności występuje niezdolność bądź wada zgody małżeńskiej lub zgoda warunkowa na małżeństwo. Zawsze jednak mamy do czynienia z wolą zawarcia małżeństwa. Takie ujęcie na gruncie procesowym tworzy problemy w orzekaniu w tym samym podmiocie zaskarżenia małżeństwa symulacji całkowitej z innymi tytułami nieważności.
EN
Rotal jurisprudence, trying cases in virtue of total simulation and other grounds of nullity in the same subject such as: incapacity due to causes of psychic nature of which in can. 1095 no. 3 CIC, gives us the following solutions: who is not capable to express marital consent, the more is not capable to exclude this consent through a positive act of will. According to can. 1095 no. 3 CIC, the matter is complicated, as the jurisprudence says. Total simulation and other grounds of nullity of which in can. 1095 no. 1‒2 CIC, can be considered alternatively. The way in which total simulation and error are treated depends in jurisprudence on the kind of error. Error concerning the person is related to the mind, and total simulation is connected with a positive act of will. Fundamental difference is that in every form of error, including fraud, the contractor has a will to enter marriage and in total simulation his will is positively opposing the marriage. Considering error in general, it should be treated as an autonomous ground of nullity and should not be merged with total simulation. Total and partial simulation are similar. Both grounds demand a positive act of will. The difference, underlined by rotal decisions, is: requirement of awareness of the party that excludes marriage totally, which is not necessary in partial simulation. The second difference is the object of exclusion, i.e. the marriage (in case of total simulation) and essential element or property (in case of partial simulation). The condition assumes the existing of a positive act of will and the awareness of stipulated condition (as well as in case of total simulation). These grounds should be treated as non‑compatible. Nullity of marriage on the ground of force or grave fear and total simulation in the same subject is considered to be very problematic in jurisprudence. Marital intention (although compelled) accompanies the marriage contracted due to force and grave fear (this intention constitutes a marital consent defect). Total simulation is lack of marital consent and intention opposing the marriage. In some rotal decisions one can come across a total simulation that is made due to force and grave fear. It seems logical to decide on the basis of both of these nullity titles in the same subject.
Ius Matrimoniale
|
2019
|
vol. 30
|
issue 2
79-93
EN
The liturgy of the Church is an expression of his life with Christ, it uses natural signs such as: wine, water, light, fire, smoke, oil, salt, and ash. It is through Christ, that they are given new meaning. This meaning is to glorify God and sanctify man. The sacramental ordinances are determined by ecclesiastical law which follows the nature and life of the Church. The ordinances of the Church, through the visible, direct us to the invisible. Behind what is visible there is no action or God's grace. These signs of God's presence are symbols, which St. Augustine calls the encounter between God and man in the world of signs and symbols, a Sacrament. The sacraments of the Church are graces given by God to man for his sanctification. In sacramental rites, the Church can change form, but never in essence and matter. The matter of the sacrament of marriage is between a woman and a man. The rites of the sacrament of marriage, were announced in 1969, are used in Poland, however, it has been adapted to the new Code of Canon Law of 1983. Jesus instituted the sacrament of marriage. Marriage should be celebrated at Holy Mass and is characterized by unity and indissolubility. During the rites of the sacrament of marriage, the Church then asks what is the will of the person is for getting married. The couple then join their right hands and place the wedding rings on each other’s ring finger. The effects of the sacrament of marriage, which express the Rites of the Sacrament of Marriage, are: marriage community, grace and family. The liturgy with the sacrament of marriage speaks of the sanctity of marriage through the beauty of its celebration.
Ius Matrimoniale
|
2021
|
vol. 32
|
issue 1
87-105
EN
Many cases of the nullity of marriage are conducted due to the inability to undertake essential marriage duties of mental incapacity (can. 1095 n. 3 CIC/83). In a significant proportion of cases, the marriage is invalid because of the immature personality of one or both parties, which makes it impossible for the spouses to take on basic marriage duties from the beginning. However, each case should be considered very carefully because the point of reaching maturity is merely contractual, and the formation of a personality lasts a lifetime.The article aims to discuss possible determinants of an immature personality shaped by the family of origin. The family shapes the basic frameworks of the child’s personality, including a system of attitudes and needs, way of satisfying them and an extremely important mechanism of self-esteem. Children, who are raised in dysfunctional families, are influenced of stressogenic and pathogenic factors, which are the source of psychological trauma, causing changes in the personality structure as well as emotional and behavioral problems.
PL
Wiele spraw o stwierdzenie nieważności małżeństwa jest prowadzonych z tytułu niezdolności do podjęcia istotnych obowiązków małżeńskich z przyczyn natury psychicznej (kan. 1095 n. 3 KPK/83). W znacznej części przypadków małżeństwo zostaje uznane za nieważne z powodu niedojrzałej osobowości jednej lub obu stron, która sprawia, że nupturienci od samego początku nie są w stanie podjąć podstawowych obowiązków małżeńskich. Każdy przypadek powinien zostać jednak rozpatrzony bardzo ostrożnie, ponieważ punkt osiągnięcia dojrzałości jest jedynie umowny, a kształtowanie osobowości trwa całe życie.Artykuł ma na celu omówienie możliwych uwarunkowań osobowości niedojrzałej, kształtowanej przez rodzinę pochodzenia. Rodzina kształtuje podstawowe zręby osobowości dziecka, m.in. system postaw i potrzeb, sposoby ich zaspokajania oraz niezwykle ważny mechanizm samooceny. Dzieci wychowujące się w rodzinach dysfunkcyjnych podlegają wpływowi stresogennych i patogennych czynników, stanowiących źródło głębokich urazów psychicznych, powodujących zmiany w strukturze osobowości oraz problemy emocjonalne i zaburzenia w zachowaniu.
first rewind previous Page / 2 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.