Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 4

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
The main objective of a commercial farm is to achieve the highest possible income from agricultural activity. The level of this income is influenced by both external and internal conditions. The agriculture sector in the EU receives significant money transferes in the form of various types of subsidies. The aim of the article is to assess the income situation of commercial farms in Poland and the importance of public assistance in shaping their economic results compared to selected EU countries. The study presents the income ranking of Polish farms covered by the FADN system in 2004–2019 and the level of public assistance for them in comparison to German and French farms and all EU farms. The study employed ratio analysis based on the measures and indicators describing the macroeconomic situation as well as the elements of the potential of farms, their income situation and the level of public assitance for them. The performed analysis demonstrates that the results of Polish farms were dependent on subsidies to a lesser extent than those of the German and French farms, and that the ratio of subsidies for Polish farms to their output per unit of agricultural area neared the same ratio in the other analysed countries. The conclusion of the study is that public asssitance extended to farms in the framework of the CAP stabilises farmers’ income, but on the other hand makes them dependent on budget transfers.
PL
Głównym celem działalności towarowego gospodarstwa rolnego jest osiągnięcie jak najwyższego dochodu z działalności rolniczej. Na wielkość dochodu uzyskiwanego przez gospodarstwa rolne wpływają zarówno uwarunkowania zewnętrzne, jak i wewnętrzne. W ramach Wspólnej Polityki Rolnej (WPR) rolnictwo jest wspierane różnego rodzaju dopłatami. Celem badania omawianego w artykule jest ocena sytuacji dochodowej oraz znaczenia wsparcia publicznego w kształtowaniu wyników ekonomicznych gospodarstw towarowych w Polsce na tle wybranych krajów UE. W opracowaniu porównano pozycję dochodową oraz poziom wsparcia publicznego polskich gospodarstw rolnych objętych systemem FADN w latach 2004– 2019 z niemieckimi i francuskimi gospodarstwami rolnymi oraz ogółem gospodarstw w UE. Zastosowano analizę wskaźnikową. Wybrano mierniki i wskaźniki charakteryzujące sytuację makroekonomiczną oraz elementy potencjału gospodarstw rolnych, ich sytuację dochodową i poziom wsparcia publicznego. Analiza pokazała, że polskie gospodarstwa w porównaniu z niemieckimi i francuskimi charakteryzowały się mniejszym uzależnieniem wyników ekonomicznych od dopłat, a relacja dopłat do działalności operacyjnej do produkcji z gospodarstwa rolnego na jednostkę powierzchni użytków rolnych w Polsce zbliżyła się do poziomu pozostałych badanych krajów. Badanie prowadzi do wniosku, że wsparcie publiczne w ramach WPR z jednej strony stabilizuje dochody rolników, z drugiej zaś uzależnia je od transferów budżetowych.
EN
The paper deals with the problem of impact of debt capital on the production results, income and profitability of farms with a similar net worth, using the Polish FADN data. Studies preceded by statistical analyses show that farmers use debt capital to increase production and financial capacity holdings. Financial results growth with the increase in debt is usually higher than production results, which indicates that debt capital. Is not only increasing the scale of production, but is also used to rationalize costs. It is also considered a financial leverage in farm development.
EN
The research on the panel of 6,173 farms keeping accounts compliant with the Polish FADN methodology focused on the correlations between subsidies and economic and financial effectiveness in 2005-2010. The traditional ratio analysis showed that the significance of budgetary support in the shaping of the aforementioned effectiveness decreases along with an increase in the extent of conducted activity. The difference in the level od subsidies is, however, considerable between individual production types of farms. Moreover, it turned out that the farms receiving the highest support (farms with field crops, mixed crops and farms keeping ruminants) did not have a directly proportional advantage as regards effectiveness as compared to the farms the least dependent on budgetary support (horticulture and farms keeping granivores). Further on, the regressive calculations showed that the three examined levels of subsidies were most often negatively correlated with effectiveness. There are no, however, clear, in statistical terms, relations between effectiveness and decoupling of budgetary support from agricultural production.
EN
The type of farming of a family agricultural holding very clearly differen-tiates its economic and financial efficiency and the possibility of the use of budget support. The performed calculations of multiple regression showed that the subsidy rate in the form of the ratio of the sum of financial support received and the income from the family agricultural holding influenced the effectiveness mostly negatively, significantly statistically. The impact of other variables from the category of subsidising holdings on economic and financial indices was not so clear when it came to the direction of the interdependence, although it met the generally accepted criteria for statistical significance in most of the cases. The same phenomenon was observed with the technical and economic production characteristics as a determinant of efficiency. In this context, it still remains a major challenge to identify the factors that influence the operating efficiency of family agricultural holdings.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.