Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Refine search results

Results found: 3

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
Ius Matrimoniale
|
2016
|
vol. 27
|
issue 4
95-122
EN
The analysis of the evidence, particularly the testimony of parties and witnesses is the essence of each process. Particularly important is the appropriate to assign the credibility of the presented theses. Human memory is sometimes unreliable and often on the basis of the analyzed court records raises the question: we remember what happened, or what we want to remember? Analysis of the mechanisms associated with the perception of the facts, their storage in memory and reconstruction and skillful interpretation of what was said “between the lines” can be very helpful.
Ius Matrimoniale
|
2016
|
vol. 27
|
issue 1
25-43
EN
The issue of the mutual relation of faith and intentions of marriage is the subject of discussion and inquiry canonical and theological. The intensity of reflections and questions on this topic is clearly connected with the change in the level of religious societies, the perception of moral and doctrinal issues and sometimes also with the expectations of the Church. A credible answer to every issue must take into account every aspect, but first must consider the truth about the man which is able to find and know God. With this assumption comes also the position of canon law doctrine proclaimed That the reality of the sacrifice of self and acceptance of the other person, even when there is no faith turns out to be more difficult to Achieve but not impossible to make. Whereas studying the dynamics of development of an act of faith in a man can better assess the same intention to marry.
Ius Matrimoniale
|
2018
|
vol. 29
|
issue 1
65-81
EN
Right of defense, being the actual possibility of intervening the parties is one of the essential elements of the structure of a just process. Preservation of the integrity of this law depends not only on the parties themselves, who are allowed to take any attitude towards their rights, but also, and perhaps above all, this task is for a judge whose goal, in addition to the search for truth is also the concern for the true contradictoriality of the process. The decisions and instances of violation of the integrity of the right to defense discussed in the article, indicate how important is this role in canonical process of the nullity of marriage.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.