Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 16

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
Onomastica
|
2024
|
vol. 68
141-164
EN
The subject of this article are Polish contemporary geographical names originated from the ethnonym Żyd ‛Jew’ and other lexemes related to Jewish culture. The material was excerpted from the “National Register of Geographical Names” (PRNG) and compared with data concerning history of these places. The analysis of several hundred toponyms derived from certain lexemes - “alleged carriers of memory of the Jews”, showed that not all of them are related to the elements of Jewish culture. Undoubtedly, the carriers of the memory of Jews are numerous geographical names derived from the ethnonym Żyd, the adjective żydowski ‛Jewish’ and, less numerous appellatives: bóżnica ‛synagogue’, kirkut, okopisko ‛Jewish cementary’, rabin ‛rabbi’, and the choronym Palestyna. They are testimony to Jewish settlement, property rights, tragic events during World War II, and document places of prayer, refuge and burial places. These toponyms are the subject of the permanent, recorded collective memory of Poles.
PL
Przedmiotem artykułu są współczesne polskie nazwy geograficzne pochodzące od etnonimu Żyd oraz innych leksemów związanych z kulturą żydowską. Materiał został zaczerpnięty z „Państwowego Rejestru Nazw Geograficznych” i porównany z danymi historycznymi. Analiza kilkuset toponimów wywodzących się od leksemów – „domniemanych nośników pamięci Żydów”, wykazała, że nie wszystkie one mają związek z elementami kultury żydowskiej. Niewątpliwie nośnikami pamięci o Żydach są liczne nazwy geograficzne wywodzące się od podstawy Żyd-, przymiotnika żydowski oraz mniej liczne od leksemów: bóżnica, ki(e)rkut, okopisko, rabin, od choronimu Palestyna. Są one świadectwem osadnictwa żydowskiego, praw własności, tragicznych wydarzeń z okresu II wojny światowej, dokumentują miejsca modlitwy, miejsca schronienia i miejsca pochówku. Toponimy te są przedmiotem trwałej, zapisanej pamięci zbiorowej Polaków.
3
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Arboretum onimiczne

100%
Onomastica
|
2017
|
vol. 61
|
issue 2
381-400
EN
The aim of this article is to present the analysis of the proper names of trees - natural monuments in comparison with other onyms motivated by appellative descriptions of trees. The article also analyses names of forests and tries to standardise Polish dendronyms. The analysis of the onymic material is accompanied by terminological studies concerning names such as phytonym (plant name), drymonym (forest name) or dendronym (tree name).The first proper names for trees appeared in the 19th century and their number increased in the 20th century due to many christenings of natural monuments. Tree names are usually chosen by a local community or authorities and they are accompanied by an appropriate legal act recognising the status of the tree. The article analyses about 2,000 tree names based on proper names and appellatives.Dendronyms are strongly anthropomorphised - over half of the names of trees with the status of a national monument have been formed on the basis of anthroponyms: names of public figures (and lesser known people as well), rulers, owners of local estates, saints, clergy, artists, local social activists, heroes and gods known from Greek, Roman and Slavic mythology, protagonists of Slavic or Norse myths, independence fighters and literary characters. Sometimes they are also based on ethnonyms, toponyms - especially those connected with the area, and on chrematonyms. Tree names derived from appellatives are also created from personal nouns related to different semantic fields, such as family, religion, professions, the fight for freedom and descriptions of various traits of trees themselves. Dendronymy mostly uses the cultural heritage of the Piast and Jagiellonian Poland and Christian traditions. It is immersed in local traditions and legends.
4
100%
Polonica
|
2016
|
vol. 36
55-66
EN
The article is an analysis of the phenomenon of polyonymy in geographical names, which is defined asany instability of onyms involving phonetic, morphological and lexical changes. The manifestations ofpolyonymy are examined in different types of toponyms, particularly new names (for objects) which werederived from other lexical foundations. Selected, representative examples illustrate the scope of thesechanges, mainly in the diachronic area, in the names of rivers, villages and caves. Non-linguistic causes ofpolyonymy are indicated, which are mostly but not exclusively, consequences of the activities of externalusers – allochthons, including people who marshal the onymic space: cartographers, codifiers.
Onomastica
|
2019
|
vol. 63
145-156
EN
Deanthroponymic Potamonyms in the Vistula River Basin (Methodological Problems and Typology of Names) Water names, using the genetic-motivational criteria, can be divided into two superior groups: deappellative and deproprial hydronyms. Among the hydronyms derived from proper names, one can distinguish between the detoponymic and deanthroponymic. The names of flowing waters from anthroponyms are the subject of this article. Preliminary statistical data regarding deanthroponymic potamonyms in the Vistula river basin, their chronology, naming models, word formation bases and geographical distribution are presented. The results of the analysis show that the deanthroponymic potamonyms account for approximately 6.8% of the names of flowing waters of the Vistula river basin, estimated at more than 13,500. They appear sporadically in documents as early as in the 13th century, with only 12% visible until the 16th century, with most of them not being noticed until the 19th and 20th centuries. Such a statistical distribution is typical for the names of the flowing waters of that basin. Deanthroponymic names of rivers represent a variety of naming models, but most often appear as a part of compound names created with the suffix -ów, one-word formations with the same suffix and derivatives from the suf. -ka. They mainly identify objects located between the Soła River and the Dunajec River, especially in the Dunajec River basin, so in mountainous and submontainous areas, as K. Rymut claimed. The basis of such potamonyms are mainly personal names with different motivations, rarely being ethnonyms and first names.
Onomastica
|
2022
|
vol. 66
355-366
EN
The article presents the current work of the Commission on Names of Localities and Physiographic Objects to put Poland’s official geographical names in order. It outlines the main trends resulting from the requests of local authorities: changes in the forms of names (phonetic, inflectional, and derivational), renominations aiming to eliminate the discord between the official and non-official toponymy, establishing names for newly created or nameless objects, changes in the type of locality, and the abolition of names. Particular attention was paid to the impact of the regulations of various central administrative authorities on naming, the principles of the codification of names were presented, the Commission’s actions to counteract the mass abolition of names of small objects, and conclusions drawn on the effects of its work between 2017–2022.
PL
Artykuł przedstawia prace Komisji Nazw Miejscowości i Obiektów Fizjograficznych mające na celu uporządkowanie urzędowych nazw geograficznych Polski. Nakreślono w nim główne typy zmian wynikające z wniosków władz samorządowych: zmiany form nazw (fonetyczne, fleksyjne i słowotwórcze), renominacje mające na celu zlikwidowanie rozdźwięku między nazwą urzędową i nazwą używaną lokalnie, ustalanie nazw dla obiektów nowo powstałych lub bezimiennych, zmiany rodzaju obiektu oraz znoszenie nazw nieużywanych i nie posiadających lokalizacji. Szczególną uwagę zwrócono na wpływ rozporządzeń różnych organów administracji centralnej na nazewnictwo, przedstawiono zasady kodyfikacji nazw oraz wnioski z efektów prac KNMiOF w latach 2017–22. 
7
100%
Onomastica
|
2018
|
vol. 62
360-362
EN
[discussion] Voprosy onomastiki, t. 14 (N o 1, 2, 3), red. Elena L. Berezovič, Ekaterinburg 2017, 207 s., 157 s., 247 s.
8
100%
Onomastica
|
2021
|
vol. 65
|
issue 1
5-8
Onomastica
|
2016
|
vol. 60
317-332
EN
Wine is a crucial part of the cultural history of the territory within the current borders of Bulgaria from the earliest times until now. It plays an important role in the life of Bulgarians and is a multiethnic heritage of this land. Bulgarian toponyms only archive a lexicon associated with wine in a small degree, with more toponyms found regarding vines and vineyards which were characteristic elements of the native landscape. The Bulgarian enonyms constitute a “multilingual patchwork”, where the locality (present, but not dominant) is mixed with globality. Locality is mainly reflected in the detoponymic and deanthroponymic names referring to the Bulgarian heritage and also the Thracian, Greek and Roman legacy of those lands. Globality is revealed in the linguistic “hybridity” manifested by the free use of foreign models, naming vocabulary and intertextuality appealing to a global experience. This part of Bulgarian enonymy derives mainly from the English and French language, as well as Spanish, Italian, Greek and Latin.
Onomastica
|
2014
|
vol. 58
105-122
EN
FROM ONOMASTIC LEXICOGRAPHY This article presents considerations from the field of onomastic lexicography, the typology of Polish dictionaries of proper names, with particular emphasis on toponomastic, including electronic ones, and selected issues of the lexicographic description of onyms – polyreferentiality, polyonymy, onomastic antonymy.
12
88%
Onomastica
|
2015
|
vol. 59
445-447
13
75%
Onomastica
|
2015
|
vol. 59
483-485
14
75%
Onomastica
|
2016
|
vol. 60
442-445
15
75%
Onomastica
|
2017
|
vol. 61
|
issue 1
318-320
EN
Review: Todor Bojadžiev, Vladimir Žobov, Georgi Kolev, Maksim Mladenov, Darina Mladenova, Vasilka Radeva, Ideografski dialekten rečnik na bălgarskija ezik, Vol. 1: A–D, Sofija 2012, 1055 pp.The article is a review of the first volume of An ideographic dialectal dictionary of the Bulgarian language. One of the crucial distinguishing features of the dictionary are the entry words, which are lexemes of literary Bulgarian naming the particular concepts. The entries are listed alphabetically but in keeping with the conceptual, onomasiological order. The particular entries contain all the registered dialectal forms along with their phonetic and morphological variants and information on the variants’ geographical distribution. Such way of presentation is supposed to provide a full picture of the equivalents of the general-language lexeme (concept) and demonstrate the diversity, lexical richness and nominational capabilities of Bulgarian dialects, while the choice of particular motivational features in the formation of words is supposed to reflect the specifics of the language users’ culture. The dictionary also contains words with no equivalents in the general language, a fact that allows for establishing the thematic groups (or semantic circles) in which Bulgarian dialects developed lexis that is peculiar to them. Rec.: Todor Bojadžiev, Vladimir Žobov, Georgi Kolev, Maksim Mladenov, Darina Mladenova, Vasilka Radeva, Ideografski dialekten rečnik na bălgarskija ezik, T. 1: A–D, Sofija 2012, ss. 1055Artykuł stanowi recenzję pierwszego tomu Ideograficznego słownika dialektów języka bułgarskiego. Jednym z podstawowych wyróżników omawianego słownika są wyrazy hasłowe – leksemy języka literackiego, nazywające poszczególne pojęcia. Artykuły hasłowe są uporządkowane alfabetycznie, ale z zachowaniem układu pojęciowego, onomazjologicznego. Poszczególne hasła zawierają zarejestrowane formy gwarowe i ich warianty fonetyczne oraz morfologiczne z uwzględnieniem rozmieszczenia terytorialnego danych postaci. Taka prezentacja ma dawać pełny obraz ekwiwalentów gwarowych danego leksemu (pojęcia) z języka ogólnego oraz pokazać różnorodność, leksykalne bogactwo i możliwości nominacyjne gwar bułgarskich, a wybór określonych cech motywacyjnych w kreacji wyrazów ma oddawać specyfikę kulturową użytkowników języka. W słowniku można też odnaleźć szereg specyficznych wyrazów, które nie mają odpowiedników w języku ogólnym, co pozwala ustalić, w jakich grupach tematycznych (czy też kręgach semantycznych) gwary wykształciły swoją własną leksykę.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.