Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 3

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  models of university
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
The concurrent processes of globalisation, computerisation, and integration shape and constantly modify developmental factors and generate multidirectional social changes. Among social life fields, one of them has been particularly sensitive to the impact of those processes and has remained in clear feedback relationship with them is education, including university-level education. This article aims to present some reflections on the key processes which influence the environment of higher education institutions’ activity and on what their impact specifically is. The factors taken into account include: the transformation of the political and economic system, integration with the European higher education area, the market shift of education, evolving social demands towards higher education institutions and society’s attitude towards work. As knowledge has become an asset largely affecting the quality of life of people and society, universities have changed their focus from searching for and exploring truth, good and beauty in the world towards becoming innovation centres, transferring knowledge as offering their educational services. In this article, those trends have been exemplified in relation to geography degree programmes, and shown through an evolution of the model of the university. Based on a review of the literature, it seems that the processes discussed also concern geography degree programmes, and the future operation of these programmes closely depends on whether they can maintain their care for high quality education coupled with genuine efforts to ensure the smooth transition of graduates into the labour market.
EN
First postwar years in the history of Poland was crucial time of doubts and hopes for building a new world and a new society. It is worth remembering, that in the first years it was not known how the history of Poland is going to be shaped and many intellectuals believed to have an unique chance to make a world better place. The interwar academic tradition was confronted with ideas of building a new type of university – the modernization dreams took many forms, occurring to be strong factor of a split between radical and moderate option. Soon those dreams have met with brutal reality and universities were transformed to important places in communist state, where national history, ideology and future elite was reproduced and shaped. We would like to focus on personalities of Józef Chałasiński and Tadeusz Kotarbiński, whose biographies met in the city of Lodz in 1945 – the place where new university was being built for the new times. Analyzing press materials, official statements and scientific papers we aim to reconstruct models of university – models as propositions of creating a new academia in a changing sociopolitical frames.
PL
Pierwsze lata powojennej historii Polski były czasem przełomowym, czasem niepewności i nadziei na nowe społeczeństwo. Wielu intelektualistów wierzyło w unikalną szansę na zmiany i budowę lepszego świata, w tym budowę nowoczesnego uniwersytetu. Tradycje międzywojennej akademii starły się z ideami tworzenia uczelni nowego typu – modernizacyjne sny przybierały różne formy, konfrontując środowiska bardziej radykalne z umiarkowanymi. Wkrótce uniwersytety zostały przekształcone w miejsca istotne dla władz, gdzie tworzono nową wykładnię historii, zaplecze ideologiczne Partii i nową elitę kraju. W niniejszej pracy koncentrujemy się na postaciach Józefa Chałasińskiego i Tadeusza Kotarbińskiego, których drogi zbiegły się w 1945 roku w robotniczej Łodzi – miejscu budowy nowego uniwersytetu na nowe czasy. Analizując ich wypowiedzi prasowe, przemówienia i artykuły naukowe rekonstruujemy modele uniwersytetów, mające stanowić propozycje ukształtowania nowej uczelni w zmieniających się ramach polityczno-społecznych.
EN
The article presents essential reservations about the proposal and the adopted Act 2.0 vel Constitution for Science. It focuses on the analysis of two topics: model of university and model of evaluation of journals and books. Our analysis is made in the light of knowledge of integrated sciences of science (containing, i.a., history of science, history of organization of higher education system and science, scientometrics and bibliometrics) and a model of university of new humanism.The article calls for introduction of series of vital modifications in the analyzed Act 2.0 and implementing regulations to remedy their fundamental drawbacks.
PL
Artykuł przedstawia zasadnicze zastrzeżenia wobec projektu i uchwalonej Ustawy 2.0 vel Konstytucji dla nauki i skupia się na analizie dwóch zagadnień: modelu uniwersytetu oraz modelu ewaluacji czasopism i książek. Analiza ta jest rozwijana w świetle wiedzy z zakresu zintegrowanego naukoznawstwa (w skład którego wchodzi m.in. historia nauki, historia organizacji szkolnictwa wyższego i nauki oraz naukometria i bibliometria) i modelu uniwersytetu nowego humanizmu.Artykuł postuluje wprowadzenie szeregu istotnych modyfikacji treści Ustawy 2.0 i rozporządzeń wykonawczych, aby zaradzić ich podstawowym wadom.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.