Inanimate Nature. Pondering the Reproductive Daguerretype

• Authors: Geoffrey Batchen

Abstracts

EN

Little has been published about reproductive daguerreotypes, a genre of photographic still life in which another picture – a drawing, an engraving, a lithograph, a painting, a printed text – is the sole referent. However, as this essay demonstrates, a study of reproductive daguerreotypes is a study of daguerreotypy itself – of its capacities and limitations as a medium, of its major figures and its diversity of commercial applications, of its many possible meanings, functions and related viewing practices. But it is also an opportunity to reflect on the place of such daguerreotypes in the larger story concerning the photographic reproduction of artworks. Reproductive daguerreotypes are distinctive in that they copy an artwork exactly but unfaithfully: they often laterally reverse the image even while rendering it small, monochrome, precious, shiny, evanescent, mobile. Most striking is the way such daguerreotypes partake of the logic of reproducibility without necessarily participating in the processes of mass production normally associated with it: as unique copies, they offer replication without multiplicity. In so doing, they complicate the orthodox account of this process promulgated by Walter Benjamin in the 1930s and repeated so many times since.

• Publisher: Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
• Journal: Artium Quaestiones
• Year: 2022
• Issue: 33
• Pages: 9-38

Dates

published

2022

Contributors

author

Geoffrey Batchen

• University of Oxford, Faculty of History

• https://orcid.org/0000000304943789

References

• Bann S., "Ingres in Reproduction", Art History 2000, December, 23:5, pp. 706-725 https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8365.00240
• Bann S., Parallel Lines: Printmakers, Painters, and Photographers in Nineteenth-Century France, New Haven 2001
• Batchen G., Apparitions: Photography and Dissemination, Sydney-Prague 2018
• Batchen G., Emanations: The Art of the Cameraless Photograph, New York 2016
• Batchen G., Negative/Positive: A History of Photography, Routledge 2020 https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429356810
• Batchen G., "Ordering Things", in: The Order of Things: Photography from the Walther Collection, ed. B. Wallis, Steidl 2015, pp. 332-339
• Benjamin W., "The Work of Art in the Age of its Technological Reproducibility" (1935-36), in: The Work of Art in the Age of Its Technical Reproducibility, and Other Writings on Media, eds. M.W. Jennings, B. Doherty and T.Y. Levin, Cambridge, MA 2008, pp. 19-55 https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1nzfgns.6
• Betzer S., "Marie d'Agoult: une critique d'art 'ingriste'", Publications de l'Institut national d'histoire de l'art, 2012, available online <https://books.openedition.org/inha/4067> [accessed: June 22, 2020] https://doi.org/10.4000/books.inha.4067
• Caldwell N., "Haunted and Haunting", Apparitions: The Photograph and Its Image, Wellington 2017, pp. 34-37
• Cotton C., The Photograph as Contemporary Art, Thames & Hudson, 2014
• Daniel M., Q. Bajac and D. Planchon-de Font-Réaulx, Le Daguerréotype Français: Un Objet Photographique, Paris 2003
• Derrida J., Of Grammatology, trans. G. Chakravorty Spivak, Baltimore 1976
• Duttlinger C., "Imaginary Encounters: Walter Benjamin and the Aura of Photography", Poetics Today 2008, Spring, 29(1), pp. 79-101 https://doi.org/10.1215/03335372-2007-018
• Edwards S., The Making of English Photography: Allegories, University Park 2006
• Gernsheim H. and A., L. J. M. Daguerre: The history of the Diorama and the Daguerreotype, New York 1968
• Hamber A., 'A Higher Branch of the Art': Photographing the Fine Arts in England, 1839-1880, Routledge 1996
• Haskell F., "A Martyr of Attributionism: Morris Moore and the Louvre Apollo and Marsyas", in: Past and Present in Art and Taste: Selected Essays, New Haven 1987, pp. 154-174, 242-246
• Jürgens M., I. Vasallos and L. Fernandes, "Joseph Berres's Phototyp: Printing photography in the service of science", The Rijksmuseum Bulletin 2018, 66(2), pp. 144-169 https://doi.org/10.52476/trb.9752
• Kate Gillespie S., The Early American Daguerreotype: Cross-Currents in Art and Technology, Cambridge, MA 2016
• Liedman S.-E., A World to Win: The Life and Works of Karl Marx, London-New York 2018
• Lowry B., I. Barrett Lowry, The Silver Canvas: Daguerreotype Masterpieces from the J. Paul Getty Museum, Los Angeles 1998
• Malreaux A., Museum without Walls, London 1967
• McRee C., "Matthew Brady and the Daguerreotype Portrait", Visualizing 19th Century, New York Digital Publication, available online: <https://visualizingnyc.org/essays/mathew-brady-and-the-daguerreotype-portrait/> [accessed: June 20, 2020]
• Mondenard A. de, "Du bon usage de la photographie", Ingres 1780-1867, Paris 2006, pp. 44-53
• Photography: Essays & Images, ed. B. Newhall, New York 1980
• Powell A., "The Errant Image: Rogier van der Weyden's Deposition from the Cross and its Copies", Art History 2006, September, 29(4), pp. 540-562 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8365.2006.00514.x
• Sanders Peirce C., "Logic as Semiotic: The Theory of Signs", in: Philosophical Writings of Peirce, ed. J. Buchler, New York 1955, pp. 107-108
• Siegel S., First Exposures: Writings from the Beginning of Photography, Los Angeles 2017
• Solomon-Godeau A., "Review Article: Parallel Lines", Visual Resources 2002, XVIII, pp. 219-227 https://doi.org/10.1080/0197376022000034907
• Walter Benjamin: Selected Writings, Volume 2, Part 2, 1931-1934, eds. M.W. Jennings, H. Eiland, and G. Smith, Cambridge, MA 1999

Identifiers

DOI

10.14746/aq.2022.33.1

Biblioteka Nauki

32347707