Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 12

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  anxiety of influence
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
The purpose of this text is to reflect on the process of building individual identity in the culture of education. The adopted perspective is based primarily on the concepts of culture and the place of the subject in it, derived from the thought of Richard Rorty and Harold Bloom. This perspective affords a look at the process of building an individual in a mature way, devoid of naivety but also revealing the hardships and aporias accompanying this process. Education can be the primary way through which man tries to get along with the world. The condition for the fortunate effect of these struggles is building a culture that is democratic, or in Rorty’s words poetic.
Conversatoria Litteraria
|
2017
|
vol. 11
|
issue XI
321-332
PL
In one of his plays entitled Hölderlin Alfonso Vallejo establishes direct and indirectconnections with life and poetry of romantic poet Friedrich Hölderlin. We analyse traces one author in writings of another using the theory of anxiety of influence by Harold Bloom. The process of self-understanding and comprehension of the art leads, according to Bloom, through a number of stages: clinamen, tessera, kenosis, demonisation, askesis and apophrades. We try to detect techniques used by Vallejo in his artistic pattern and determine what are aesthetic and formal consequences of his endeavor.
EN
The article is an attempt to sum up Czesław Miłosz’s complicated relation with Adam Mickiewicz. The aim of the text is to outline Miłosz’s revisionary process and to focus on its last period called apophrades. The anxiety of influence and the anxiety of cultural empti-ness, which he prophesied, seem to be especially intriguing aspects of Miłosz’s literary heritage.
EN
This article presents Stefan Żeromski’s long journal-keeping practice used as a tool of more or less effective autotherapy and a private, self-governed course of creative writing. Making his way to Polish literature, Żeromski is first guided by his zealous and charismatic teacher from Kielce higschool, Antoni Gustaw Bem, who promotes an agonistic, harsh and aggressive vision of the cultural tradition and writing process which, for a modern ear, mirrors Harold Bloom’s anxiety of influence. However, his devoted and loving student finds another, milder perspective, built on enchantment, passion and the literary sense of belonging. Żeromski’s hot, somatic and extremely intimate attitude toward his work is illustrated by strikingly female writing metaphors such as novelist’s labor compared to the experience of pregnancy or to the activity of a spider persistently making its subtle web. In the second part of this article, the author aims to show that the critical discourse surrounding his profoundly involved literature, a discourse burdened with fear and abjection, bears a close resemblance to the methods of hushing and exorcising women’s voices identified as weird and hysterical.
EN
The main aim of this article is to present the methods in which Slovenian myths of Romantic provenience, present in France Prešeren’s poetry, are deconstructed since the fifties of nineteenth century. Prešeren (1800−1849) is regarded as the national poet, who enabled the Slovenian community and competed with the canon of European literature. Parallelly to the process of his canonization occurred the reverse of it, The Anxiety of Influence, described by Harold Bloom. Poets Simon Jenko (1835−1869) and Oton Župančič (1878−1949) had been deconstructing the myths of Romantic love, mythical conception of poetry, poets and nation in the period of realism and modernism, as well as the poet Veno Taufer in the period of neo-avantgarde (1933−). The intertextual analysis of their poems shows several ways of contesting the influence of the main topics and aesthetic codes from Prešeren’s poetry, determined by the role of poetry in Slovenian culture, described in the late sixties of twentieth century as Prešeren structure.
EN
The study is a “multiple hybrid” combining the features of a review of Małgorzata Rygielska’s monograph Przyboś czyta Norwida [Przyboś reads Norwid] and a polemic with the theses contained in the volume. It is also a form of a notebook for an exhaustive and still not finished – albeit quite possible in its utmost form-parallel Przyboś – Norwid. Rygielska’s volume, although it has not proven a complete discussion of the present report, surely is the most detailed one as for today (against the background of the texts, among others by Barbara Łazińska and Przemysław Dakowicz). The context of the author’s reconnaissance is – it has to be admitted – specific. It is formed, on the one hand, by the theory of reading, and on the other, by the area of theory of interpretation. A lack of discussion of Norwid’s Test as a whole (for generally unknown reasons the author passes over Part V and Part VI of Przyboś’s essay, both of them symptomatic, sketching a peculiar, the author’s own psycho-biography of Norwid). Also missing a chance to reinterpret the whole volume More about the Manifesto as “coming to terms with Norwid’s influences” that does not have its counterpart in Polish literature seems to be a drawback.
EN
„Odkryta” dla szerszego grona czytelników dopiero po 1989 roku twórczość literacka Jana Křesadly od początku budziła kontrowersje wśród czytelników i recenzentów, sam pisarz zaś traktowany był jako typowy outsider, ktoś, kto świadomie skazuje się na wegetację na peryferiach czeskiej kultury współczesnej. Na sytuację tę Křesadlo reagował, nieustannie wdając się w spory i polemiki z innymi prozaikami, używając do tego postmodernistycznych strategii narracyjnych bazujących na eksponowaniu intertekstualnego i autotelicznego charakteru literackiej reprezentacji oraz dążąc do parodystycznego ośmieszenia pisarskiej maniery swych adwersarzy (przede wszystkim Milana Kundery). Obszerne fragmenty jego dzieł odczytywać też można w kategoriach „powieści z kluczem”. Nie sposób jednak oprzeć się wrażeniu, że eksponowana w jego pisarstwie zależność od bardziej cenionych (w opinii powszechnej) autorów wypływa z opisywanego przez Harolda Blooma „lęku przed wpływem” i ze zrodzonej stąd potrzeby uwolnienia się od zbyt silnie narzucających się wzorców.
PL
The literary works of Jan Křesadlo, which were “discovered” just after 1989, from the very beginning have caused controversy among the reviewers and readers, and the writer himself was treated as a typical outsider who deliberately decided to function on the periphery of the contemporary Czech culture. His answer to this uncomfortable situation included ceaseless polemics and disputes with the other writers. Most often he used the postmodern narrative strategies based on the intertextual and autotelic means of literary representation. In this way, he aimed at the parodistic ridiculing of his adversaries (first and foremost it was Milan Kundera). Extensive fragments of his works can be read as belonging to the category of “novels with a key”. On the other hand, it is difficult to avoid the impression that his intertextual reliance on the esteemed (in common opinion) authors is caused by the “anxiety of influence” (the term of Harold Bloom) and by a need to overcome these “strong” role models.
EN
The aim of the article is to analyse references to Adam Mickiewicz that appear in Juliusz Słowacki’s letters. Ambivalent character of these references proves that complicated relationship between the two poets can be analysed through Harold Bloom’s “anxiety of influence” theory. In this article, however, letters referring to Mickiewicz are being analysed in a broader context − as an example of how Słowacki struggled with literary authority as such.
PL
Celem artykułu jest analiza wzmianek na temat Adama Mickiewicza pojawiających się w korespondencji Juliusza Słowackiego. Ich ambiwalentny charakter potwierdzać może przypuszczenie, że skomplikowana relacja pomiędzy poetami da się analizować za pomocą teorii „lęku przed wpływem” Harolda Blooma. W niniejszym szkicu fragmenty korespondencji dotyczące Mickiewicza analizowane są jednak w szerszym kontekście zmagań Słowackiego z problemem autorytetów w dziedzinie literatury.
9
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Prekursorzy Rymkiewicza

63%
EN
Artykuł opisuje zależność historycznych esejów Jarosława Marka Rymkiewicza od twórczości znaczących dla pisarza poprzedników, analizowaną zgodnie z Harolda Blooma teorią „lęku przed wpływem”. Obok źródeł oczywistych, takich jak dzieła Marii Janion, wskazane są tu również te słabiej pamiętane, jak eseistyka Jerzego Łojka, a także zaskakujące zrazu, jak filozofia i biografia Michela Foucaulta. Interpretacja tych związków rozwija psychoanalityczne inspiracje Blooma, problematyzując je wszakże zestawieniem ze „schizoanalizą” zaproponowaną w Anty-Edypie Gillesa Deleuze’a i Félixa Guattariego.
PL
The article describes how the historical essays of Jarosław Marek Rymkiewicz depend on the works of his important predecessors. This dependency is analysed in accordance with Harold Bloom’s “anxiety of influence” theory. I bring up well-known sources, such as the works of Maria Janion, less-remembered sources, such as the essays of Jerzy Łojek, as well as sources that may initially come as a surprise, such as the philosophy and biography of Michel Foucault. In interpreting these connections I develop Bloom’s psychoanalytical inspirations, but I also problematise them by juxtaposing them with the “schizoanalysis” proposed by Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari in Anti-Oedipus.
10
63%
EN
The study is a “multiple hybrid” combining the features of a review of Małgorzata Rygielska’s monograph Przyboś czyta Norwida [Przyboś reads Norwid] and a polemic with the theses contained in the volume. It is also a form of a notebook for an exhaustive and still not finished – albeit quite possible in its utmost form-parallel Przyboś – Norwid. Rygielska’s volume, although it has not proven a complete discussion of the present report, surely is the most detailed one as for today (against the background of the texts, among others by Barbara Łazińska and Przemysław Dakowicz). The context of the author’s reconnaissance is – it has to be admitted – specific. It is formed, on the one hand, by the theory of reading, and on the other, by the area of theory of interpretation. A lack of discussion of Norwid’s Test as a whole (for generally unknown reasons the author passes over Part V and Part VI of Przyboś’s essay, both of them symptomatic, sketching a peculiar, the author’s own psycho-biography of Norwid). Also missing a chance to reinterpret the whole volume More about the Manifesto as “coming to terms with Norwid’s influences” that does not have its counterpart in Polish literature seems to be a drawback.
EN
The article interprets the changes in works and personality of Czesław Miłosz, in accordance with Harold Blooms model of agon between the poetic ephebe and his precursor. I pick up a discussion with the ealier Bloomian takes on Miłosz, which suggest that his most important teacher was Adam Mickiewicz. A careful analysis of Miłosz’s memoirs and ideologicaldeclarations proves that the original influence, decisive on Miłosz’s whole future evolution, came from a catechist, Rev. Leopold Chomski, white other master figures in poet’s works were just remoulding the original teacher’s image.
PL
Artykuł stanowi interpretację przemiany twórczości i osobowości Czesława Miłosza zgodnie z zaproponowanym przez Harolda Blooma modelem agonu poetyckiego efeba z prekursorem. Autor polemizuje z wcześniejszymi ujęciami twórczości Miłosza w tym duchu – sugerującymi, że najważniejszym nauczycielem poety był Adam Mickiewicz. Tymczasem uważna analiza wspomnień i deklaracji ideowych autora Rodzinnej Europy dowodzi, że źródłowy wpływ, który zdecydował o przebiegu całej dalszej ewolucji Miłosza, wywarł na niego katecheta, ksiądz Leopold Chomski, inne zaś figury mistrzowskie w twórczości poety to przekształcenia obrazu tego pierwotnego nauczyciela.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.