Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 2

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  demotivation
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
Studies investigating the motivation of L1 speakers of English to learn the national language of the host society they currently reside in remain rare, despite the exponential growth of such individuals residing in these nations this century. Previous such studies in South Korea have concluded that learning Korean as a second language (L2) is largely perceived as difficult, unnecessary and is therefore accompanied by experiences of demotivation and amotivation (see Gearing & Roger, 2018). However, these studies did not explicitly address demotivation and amotivation when examining experiences that affect the motivation to learn Korean of 14 English as a Foreign Language (EFL) instructors working in South Korean university language education centers (LECs). Therefore, this study investigates which learning experiences resulted in the amotivation of participants and how two participants who experienced demotivation employed strategies to remotivate themselves. Coding of semi-structured interviews and optional diaries found that despite intent, most participants displayed symptoms of both amotivation and demotivation. The main implication of this study is that in the absence of perceived necessity, affected individuals with insufficient internal motivation or vision to acquire Korean consequently attribute externally related demotivating experiences to pre-existing or resulting amotivation.
EN
The paper presents the key substantial and methodological aspects of motivation for work, with special attention paid to the analysis of classification of motivating factors. The selected, more important of them, have been described. A new approach to them has been presented in the form of the concept of trychotomy of motivating factors at work (i.e. in the environment, in the situation of work), which constitutes the evolution of the two-factor theory by Frederick Herzberg. This concept lists three groups of factors: "motivators" give satisfaction when present, "factors of hygiene" cause dissatisfaction when not present, and "demotivators" cause dissatisfaction when present. Their vectors of effect on satisfaction with work differ radically, although they are present at the same time in the work environment. That is why this concept constitutes the methodological directive which suggests expansion of the field of analysis of the conducted research by the factors which reduce motivation in the workplace.
PL
W artykule przedstawiono węzłowe kwestie merytoryczne i metodyczne motywacji do pracy, ze szczególnym zwróceniem uwagi na analizę klasyfikacji czynników motywacji. Scharakteryzowano wybrane, ważniejsze z nich. Zaprezentowano nowe ich ujęcie w postaci koncepcji trychotomii czynników motywacji w pracy (tj. w środowisku, w sytuacji pracy), która stanowi rozwinięcie dwuczynnikowej teorii Fredericka Herzberga. W tej koncepcji wyróżniono trzy grupy czynników: "motywatory", które gdy występują, powodują zadowolenie; "czynniki higieny" - gdy nie występują, wywołują niezadowolenie; oraz "demotywatory" - gdy pojawiają się, powodują niezadowolenie. Ich wektory oddziaływania na zadowolenie z pracy różnią się diametralnie, chociaż występują one w środowisku pracy równocześnie. Dlatego też koncepcja ta stanowi dyrektywę metodologiczną sugerującą rozszerzenie pola analizy prowadzonych badań na czynniki zmniejszające motywację w pracy.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.