Results found: 2

Search results

Search:
in the keywords: national canon

Sort By:

Limit search:

Towards more meaningful teaching of literature in Serbian schools. (Paradoxes of curriculum)

100%

Opačić Z.

Annales Universitatis Paedagogicae Cracoviensis. Studia ad Didacticam Litterarum Polonarum et Linguae Polonae Pertinentia

2017

vol. 8

issue 227

35-46

In this paper we deal with the current problems of teaching literature in the educational system of the Republic of Serbia and point to the complex external and internal factors affecting the collapse of its importance. We begin by examining the impact of neo-liberal tendencies of education policy, focused on identifying competencies and skills in the teaching of literature. Transforming education in useful, measurable product denies the nature of literature, since the form of the test cannot estimate the multiple understanding of complex artistic text. The role of literature in contemporary education has been further destroyed by suppressing the spirituality in growing up, phenomenon of fluid identity and social crisis and a period of transition. The consequences are the reading crisis and counteraction of students towards literary texts from curriculum. We consider the multiple paradoxes of the curriculum: the contradiction between the canon and the reception possibilities of young readers, the issue of gap between young readers’ affinity from curriculum texts and the question of the national canon in the global context. How to achieve a better quality of teaching literature in Serbian schools and inspire students to read the curriculum texts? We recommend updating the curriculum, inclusion of modern literary texts (taking into account the aesthetic criteria) and vertical rotation in the approach of modern text to literary history; changing teaching methods of immanent orientation of the text to the application of multiple methodological approach and encouraging students to independent, critical attitude towards the text, forming substantiated, critical judgments about themselves and the world.

WIESZCZ – BŁAZEN – LEGENDA: TRAJEKTORIA AUTORSKA ANATOLA SYSA

71%

Kowalow S.

Porównania

2018

vol. 23

issue 2

107-126

The article is dedicated to a complicated trajectory of the outstanding Belarusian poet Anatol Sys (1959-2005), whose unusual fate intrigues readers no less than his poetry, and makes researchers search for new explanations of metamorphoses in his life and creative work. From the memoirs of contemporaries, academic articles and works of art an extremely controversial image of the writer arises: a leader of the generation, a fighter with Communist ideology, a prophet of the national revival, a Genius; a disgusting poet, a jester, an alcoholic, a freak, a boor. There have been various assessments of Sys’s personality and the place of his work in the history of the Belarusian literature which “in the opinion of the author, originate for the following three reasons: 1) the extraordinary and contradictory nature of the poet; 2) the nature of the interval the time in which Sys lived and which falls into three epochs: stagnant Soviet (before 1984), transition-renaissance (1985-1992), and Lukashenko’s (since 1994); 3) a complex trajectory of the poet’s life and creative path which can be divided into three stages: initial, revival and Bohemian (“infernal”). Even during his life, the personality of Anatol Sys began to acquire myths and legends, and after his death, his best works entered the canon of the national literature of the 20th century.

Аrtykuł jest poświęcony złożonej trajektorii autorskiej Anatola Sysa (1959-2005), którego niezwyczajny los intryguje czytelnika nie mniej niż jego utwory poetyckie i wymusza na badaczach poszukiwanie wciąż nowych sposobów interpretacji jego artystycznych i życiowych metamorfoz. Ze wspomnień przyjaciół, artykułów naukowych i utworów artystycznych wyłania się sprzeczny wizerunek pisarza: głos pokolenia, przeciwnik ideologii komunistycznej, prorok odrodzenia narodowego, Geniusz, poeta obrzydliwy, błazen, alkoholik, wyrodek, cham. Owa różnorodność i odmienność interpretacji w ocenie osobowości Anatola Sysa oraz miejsca, które jego twórczość zajmuje w historii literatury białoruskiej, uzasadniona jest zdaniem autora artykułu trzema przyczynami: 1) niezwykłą i sprzeczną naturą poety; 2) specyfiką krótkiego okresu, w którym żył Anatol Sys, obejmującego trzy epoki: radziecką (do 1984 roku), epokę reform i odrodzenia narodowego (1985-1992) і epokę Alaksandra Łukaszenki (od 1994 roku); 3) złożoną trajektorią życiowej i twórczej drogi poety, w której można wyróżnić trzy okresy: wczesny, patriotyczny i przeklęty (okres przynależności do cyganerii artystycznej). Jeszcze za życia Anatola Sysa jego osoba zaczęła obrastać w mity i legendy, a po śmierci poety jego najlepsze utwory weszły do kanonu literatury narodowej XX wieku.

Refine search results

1 Annales Universitatis Paedagogicae Cracoviensis. Studia ad Didacticam Litterarum Polonarum et Linguae Polonae Pertinentia

1 Porównania

1 Kowalow S.

1 Opačić Z.

1 2018

1 2017

Search results

Towards more meaningful teaching of literature in Serbian schools. (Paradoxes of curriculum)

WIESZCZ – BŁAZEN – LEGENDA: TRAJEKTORIA AUTORSKA ANATOLA SYSA