Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 5

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Counter-limits doctrine in the jurisprudence of the Constitutional Tribunal (until 2015)

100%
Wróbel A.
Studia Prawnicze
|
2018
|
issue 3 (215)
7-35
EN
The analysis herein, while mainly descriptive, presents the main foundations of the Constitutional Tribunal’s jurisprudence in matters of hierarchical control of the constitutionality of laws concerning the EU. It distinguishes some principles, concepts and constitutional theories which, according to the Constitutional Tribunal, set the limits of European integration. The main thesis of the paper is that, in this context, the basic and decisive rule is the supremacy of the Constitution, which does not have exceptions or limitations. A hypothesis was also formulated that the Solange II maxim does not reflect the actual state of European constitutionalism, in which the level of protection of fundamental rights is significantly increased while possible collisions between the level of protection of fundamental rights in the EU and the Member States should be solved by means of the clauses provided in Articles 51–54 of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights.
2

Totalitaryzm a funkcjonalistyczna utopia. Wątki systemowe w twórczości Janusza A. Zajdla

100%
Wróbel A.
Studia nad Autorytaryzmem i Totalitaryzmem
|
2018
|
vol. 40
|
issue 4
81-96
EN
In the Polish literature of the last two decades of the Polish People’s Republic (PRL), science fiction, especially sociological science fiction, served as a substitute for political literature, which was impossible to publish under state censorship. The majority of this genre was anti-utopian or critical of the totalitarian reality. This attitude was hidden under fantastical make-up and was very strongly related to the here-and-now of the period in which the books originated. Janusz A. Zajdel is the most important representative of this genre, however, at the same time he manages to avoid limiting his work to the thinly veiled politics of the time. While the topics of his work very often repeated themselves the stories go beyond the drama of the individuals or groups confronted with the totalitarian regime and focus on certain repeatable mechanisms within the system itself. Due to the above characteristics, his literary work transcends from being just a criticism of the internal workings of PRL into the area of structural functionalism of a universal social system. Social structures that play a central role in Zajdel’s work, are always built from the same, very clearly outlined building blocks. It may seem that the characters and the plot of the novels are only an addition to the views on the structure and the shape of society expressed by the author. Common elements that build that world remain at the core of all the novels and the pretextual story lines of Zajdel make it easier to present those elements in the internal functioning of the sometimes very complicated social systems that Zajdel describes. Dysfunctional elements that prevent the exercise of totalitarian control inside the system, for Zajdel seem to be of far greater importance than his story lines. These relations, so characteristic of the late PRL, referred to in the literature as “dirty togetherness”, are phenomena of exercising control over specific measures and social resources available in the framework of the social system for the implementation of not the objectives, which were designated by those socio-political systems, but by social groups or entities that use them for their own purposes. The main theme of Zajdel’s novels are dysfunctions that occur as part of the totalitarian system, but his social systems never meet the defining criteria of totalitarianism in the classic sense. Totalitarianism is not the main intrest of the novels but is only used instrumentally as the make-up for the description of the mechanism of the internal workings of these dysfunctions. Zajdel sees dirty togetherness as a structural element of the system, without which the continuous functioning of the system would be impossible.
3
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Smoleńska roszada 2010. Walka o wartości czy gry rzeczywistością

100%
Wróbel A.
Nauka i Szkolnictwo Wyższe
|
2013
|
issue 1(41)
167-183
EN
The study deals with the phenomenon of reality transformation by means of semantic modification and change of meanings of key concepts in narrative about the reality. It explains how political parties undertook such an attempt and the context of the transformation of this phenomenon as a result of the Smolensk plane crash and subsequent short-term replacement of before crash reality with a new reality constructed just after the event. Deals with relationship of Sapir-Whorf theory of Linguistic relativism with the concept of Social Construction of Reality by Berger and Luckman. The context of teoretical frame is the Jaroslaw Kaczynski’s presidential campaign of 2010 with the focus on key statements of the candidate and their changes over time. Concluding with the problem of disorder in the realities after the presidential elections and the consequences of which appeared to be completely different for the organization of the party than the general population.
PL
Tekst dotyczy problematyki zjawiska przemiany rzeczywistości za pomocą językowej manipulacji znaczeniami symboli i pojęć kluczowych dla narracji o rzeczywistości partii politycznych, w kontekście przemiany tego zjawiska na skutek katastrofy smoleńskiej i następującego po nim zjawiska krótkotrwałego zastąpienia rzeczywistości nową wytworzoną tuż po katastrofie. Przedstawia związek teorii relatywizmu językowego Sapira-Whorfa z koncepcją społecznego tworzenia rzeczywistości Bergera i Luckmana w kontekście próby uchwycenia kampanii prezydenckiej Jarosława Kaczyńskiego w paradygmacie konstruowania językowego rzeczywistości społecznej ze wskazaniem kluczowych wypowiedzi i ich zmiany w czasie, a także pozostawiony po wyborach bałagan w rzeczywistościach i jego konsekwencje, które ukazały się zupełnie inne dla organizacji partyjnych niż dla ogółu wyborców.
4
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Misja prawniczego czasopisma naukowego w kryzysie i anomii konstytucyjnej

63%
Wróbel A., Ziółkowski M.
Ruch Prawniczy, Ekonomiczny i Socjologiczny
|
2021
|
vol. 83
|
issue 2
101-121
EN
Referring to the honourable one-hundred-year history of Ruch Prawniczy, Ekonomiczny i Socjologiczny, and the more than seventy-year tradition of Państwo i Prawo, the two most prestigious legal journals in Poland, the authors discuss the mission of legal journals in a democratic society. They focus on the times of constitutional revolutions and transformations, where the well-established interpretations of constitutional provisions became questioned or even violated. The 2015−2020 constitutional developments in Poland serve as an illustrative background and point of reference for the authors in answering the following question: how and what should legal journals publish when the constitution is being ‘vanished’ (to use the compelling metaphor of Mirosław Wyrzykowski). This predominantly descriptive and interpretative article consists of the following four parts: the mission of journals, constitutional revolution, constitutional crisis, and constitutional anomy.
PL
Odwołując się do stuletniej historii „Ruchu Prawniczego, Ekonomicznego i Socjologicznego” oraz ponadsiedemdziesięcioletniej tradycji „Państwa i Prawa”, dwóch najbardziej prestiżowych czasopism prawniczych w Polsce, autorzy rozważają pojęcie misji czasopisma naukowego i jej znaczenie w demokratycznym społeczeństwie. Rozważania te osadzone zostały w szczególnym kontekście: rewolucji konstytucyjnych, w trakcie których utrwalone interpretacje konstytucyjne są kwestionowane, a przepisy konstytucyjne – naruszane. Tłem rozważań autorów są zmiany polskiego prawa i praktyki z lat 2015–2020 o znaczeniu konstytucyjnym. Ten okolicznościowy artykuł szkicuje odpowiedź na pytanie, jak czasopisma prawnicze powinny reagować na sytuację „wymazywania” konstytucji (by użyć obrazowej metafory Mirosława Wyrzykowskiego). Aby odpowiedzieć na to pytanie, autorzy odwołują się kolejno do koncepcji: rewolucji konstytucyjnej, kryzysu konstytucyjnego, oraz adaptują pojęcie anomii konstytucyjnej. Artykuł ma w istotnej mierze charakter deskryptywny oraz interpretacyjny, choć jego części mogą służyć dalszym rozważaniom normatywnym.
5
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Debata zorganizowana przez Komitet Naukoznawstwa PAN pt. "Czy nauka w Polsce jest innowacyjna?", 17 czerwca 2011, Warszawa, Pałac Kultury i Nauki

27%
Białoń L., Wróbel A., Abriszewski K., Olechnicka A., Drewniak D., Kawalec P., Niedbalska G., Gasparski W., Dąbrowa-Szefler M., Białecki I., Stefaniak B.
Zagadnienia Naukoznawstwa
|
2012
|
vol. 48
|
issue 4 (194)
293-317
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.