Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 5

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  New Rhetoric
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

La théorie du Językowy Obraz Świata (Image Linguistique du Monde) : du monde universitaire polonais au contexte académique français

100%
Kwapisz-Osadnik K., Collinet F.
Studia Romanica Posnaniensia
|
2022
|
vol. 49
|
issue 2
73-85
EN
The paper proposes to link French (or Francophone) and Polish university didactics, in a context where their linguistic and cultural roots differ. The reflexion is based on the articulation of two theories: an object-theory (the Językowy Obraz Świata), which is borrowed from the field of polonistics, and an instrument-theory, (Perelman’s New Rhetoric). The didactic challenge is to propose a neo-rhetorical platform where prior agreements on concepts and theories are negotiated in order to finally raise students’ awareness of the problem of transfers of concepts and theories in the context of philological studies. These agreements must be made first within the same scientific community (Polish community), then between scientific communities representing different cultures (Polish and French communities).
2
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

The antidote to the fear. The rhetorical genres as a link between literature and society. Examples from Italian literature

88%
Capaci B.
Res Rhetorica
|
2017
|
vol. 4
|
issue 1
32-46
EN
After a brief historical-methodological overview, this study is meant to prove that the theory of rhetorical genres (deliberative, judicial and epideictic), connected to that of the literary genres, offers scholars more insightful critical opportunities. The nouvelle rhétorique, applied to the analysis of rhetorical and literary genres, permits to unveil the argumentative dimension in literature. We have evaluated some passages of the Decameron and I promessi sposi [The Betrothed], two of the great classics of Italian literature, differing by historical settings, genres and contents. The two books have been analyzed from the rhetorical perspective. I promessi sposi [The Betrothed] may be interpreted as an instance of judicial genre, while the Decameron as deliberative and epideictic genres.
3
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Dialog zgody jako neoretoryczny projekt Bachtina

87%
Tiupa Walerij Igoriewicz T. W. I.
Przestrzenie Teorii
|
2020
|
issue 33
393-407
EN
The article is dedicated to the idea of dialogism in the philosophy of Mikhail Bakhtin. The author assumes that the dialogism of this Russian philosopher of ideas and literary critic is presented in a new light as a clearly valid intention in humanistic thinking. The focus is particularly turned towards the notion of the “dialogue of agreement”. The author examines various communication strategies (of submission, tolerance, convergence). Moreover, attention is drawn to the non-authoritarian, trans-- hierarchical types of resultative communication which leads to the convergence of awareness. The dialogic relation of agreement is perceived as the ultimate goal of every dialogue.
4
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Teoretyczne wybory, cięcia metodologiczne i przejścia między paradygmatami: trudności dialogu interdyscyplinarnego

63%
Kwapisz-Osadnik K., Collinet F.
Półrocznik Językoznawczy Tertium
|
2018
|
vol. 3
|
issue 2
EN
This article is an attempt to reflect upon the problem of choosing a theoretical approach. From another side, it touches upon the question of conducting scientific enquiry- in the face of the actual inter-disciplinary turn taken in some fields of research. The starting point of these reflec-tions in this particular field will be the concept of interdisciplinarity as understood in France and the claims of the New Rhetorics which can themselves be understood as being interdiscipli-nary. Moreover, the New Rhetoric can be used to describe a dialogue between different disci-plines. In reference to the concept of predicate, which has different meanings in the fields of French and Polish linguistic research, the present article will touch upon fundamental dilemmas, mis-understandings and difficulties in scientific debate and the problems which stem from the dif-ferences between the French and Polish academic traditions. In this context, the New Rhetoric could play the role of a platform for dialogue between researchers representing different scien-tific traditions, because on the one hand, the New Rhetoric takes into account the relation be-tween the researcher’s formation and his prior representations concerning the matter. On the other hand, the New Rhetoric introduces the term 'plasticity of notions' based on which argu-mentation can be founded or based. In conducting research founded on interdisciplinary dia-logue it is important to adopt “a view from afar” (Levi-Strauss 1983); or, in other words, to maintain a certain distance from one's discipline, tradition and a way of querying, so that our scientific works would become comprehensible for scholars representing different disciplines and above all, to enable a dialogue within the framework of those disciplines.
PL
W niniejszym artykule podjęto próbę refleksji nad problemem wyboru zaplecza teoretycznego z jednej strony, a kwestią prowadzenia wywodu naukowego z drugiej - w obliczu współczesnego interdyscyplinarnego kierunku badań. Punkt wyjścia rozważań w tym zakresie stanowi rozumienie interdyscyplinarności we Francji oraz tezy Nowej Retoryki, ktόre same mogą być rozważane jako interdyscyplinarne. Co więcej Nowej Retoryki można używać, żeby opisać dialog między rόżnymi dyscyplinami. Odnosząc się do pojęcia predykat inaczej rozumianego w obszarze polskich i francuskich badań językoznawczych, w artykule opisano podstawowe dylematy, niezrozumienia i trudności w dialogu naukowym, wywodzącym się z różnych (francuskiej i polskiej) tradycji uniwersyteckich. W tym kontekście Nowa Retoryka mogłaby odegrać rolę platformy dialogu między badaczami reprezentującymi różne tradycje naukowe, gdyż z jednej strony bierze pod uwagę związek między i formacją badacza a przedwstępnymi postanowieniami, a z drugiej strony wprowadza termin "rozciągłość pojęć", na którym argumentacja może opierać się. W prowadzeniu badań opartych na dialogu interdyscyplinarnego ważne jest "spojrzenie oddalone" (Lévi-Strauss, 1983), czyli pewien dystans do swojej dyscypliny, tradycji i dociekań tak, aby nasze prace naukowe stały się dostępne dla badaczy reprezentujących inne dyscypliny, ale przede wszystkim, aby możliwy był dialog w ramach tych samych dyscyplin.
5
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Retoryka i socjo-retoryka w lekturze tekstów Nowego Testamentu Cz. 1: Retoryka i nowe podejście do tradycji ustnej

45%
Kowalski M.
The Biblical Annals
|
2016
|
vol. 6
|
issue 4
611-654
EN
In the present article, the author argues for the usefulness and importance of rhetoric and socio-rhetoric for the reading of the New Testament texts. Part I is dedicated to the rhetorical approach. The point of departure are the remarks of the Pontifical Biblical Commission on the questionable rhetorical education of biblical authors, on may kinds of rhetoric, and on the limited applicability of rhetoric to the analysis of biblical text. The author answers the objections raised against the rhetorical method and argues for the use of Greco-Roman rhetoric as the compositional instrument closest to the cultural milieu of the New Testament authors. The Greco-Roman rhetoric presents itself as the best tool to explore the texture of biblical writings characterized by high residual orality. To substantiate it, the author shows the recent change of paradigm in the approach to the oral tradition and textuality in the Bible. Part I of the article finishes with the elaboration and exposition of the basic steps of rhetorical analysis proposed by George A. Kennedy.
PL
In the present article the author argues for the usefulness and importance of rhetoric and socio-rhetoric in reading the New testament texts. Part I is dedicated to the rhetorical approach. The point of departure are the remarks of Pontifical Biblical Commission on the questionable rhetorical education of biblical authors, on may kinds of rhetoric, and on the limited applicability of rhetoric to the analysis of biblical text. The author answers the objections raised against the rhetorical method and argues for the use of Greco-Roman rhetoric as the compositional instrument closest to the cultural milieu of the New Testament authors. The Greco-Roman rhetoric presents itself as the best tool to explore the texture of biblical writings characterized by high residual orality. To substantiate it, the author shows the recent change of paradigm in the approach to the oral tradition and textuality in the Bible. Part I of the article finishes with the elaboration and exposition of the basic steps of rhetorical analysis proposed by George A. Kennedy.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.