Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 11

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  Trauma
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
Individuals who have experienced childhood sexual abuse report numerous problems in intimate relationships, including their physical and sexual experience. Satisfying sexuality arises from intimate safety, the prerequisite for which is mutual trust, which, however, can be impaired due to betrayal in individuals who were traumatized by sexual abuse in their childhood. In a study with 168 participants, we were interested in differences in intimate safety within intimate relationships (measured by the ISQ – Intimate Safety Questionnaire subscale which refers to sexual safety). Differences were studied within two groups of couples – those who had experienced childhood sexual abuse and those who had never experienced the sexual abuse in childhood. We found that among the participating couples, in 42 (50%) couples at least one of the partners experienced at least one type of sexual abuse. One or more types of sexual abuse in childhood were experienced by 12 (14%) men and 39 (46.4%) women. We also found that in couples who had experienced sexual abuse in childhood and couples who had not, there is a difference in intimate safety in their sexual life. The couples who had not experienced sexual abuse in childhood reported statistically significantly higher sexual safety in their intimate relationships. We can conclude that childhood sexual abuse trauma is expressed in sexual intimacy with mistrust, which through the decreased feeling of safety inhibits individuals’ vulnerability and reduces the opportunity to create intimacy. The survey was limited by a biased sample.
PL
Individuals who have experienced childhood sexual abuse report numerous problems in intimate relationships, including their physical and sexual experience. Satisfying sexuality arises from intimate safety, the prerequisite for which is mutual trust, which, however, can be impaired due to betrayal in individuals who were traumatized by sexual abuse in their childhood. In a study with 168 participants, we were interested in differences in intimate safety within intimate relationships (measured by the ISQ – Intimate Safety Questionnaire subscale which refers to sexual safety). Differences were studied within two groups of couples – those who had experienced childhood sexual abuse and those who had never experienced the sexual abuse in childhood. We found that among the participating couples, in 42 (50%) couples at least one of the partners experienced at least one type of sexual abuse. One or more types of sexual abuse in childhood were experienced by 12 (14%) men and 39 (46.4%) women. We also found that in couples who had experienced sexual abuse in childhood and couples who had not, there is a difference in intimate safety in their sexual life. The couples who had not experienced sexual abuse in childhood reported statistically significantly higher sexual safety in their intimate relationships. We can conclude that childhood sexual abuse trauma is expressed in sexual intimacy with mistrust, which through the decreased feeling of safety inhibits individuals’ vulnerability and reduces the opportunity to create intimacy. The survey was limited by a biased sample.
3
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Noty o książkach

89%
EN
Critical notes on books: Michał Kisiel's critical note on:Jacques Derrida, Cinders, przeł. Ned Lukacher, Minneapolis, London, University of Minnesota Press, 2014. Anna Maraś's critical note on: Marianne Hirsch, The Generation of Postmemory: Writing and Visual Culture After the Holocaust, New York: Columbia University Press, 2012.
PL
Noty o książkach zawierają krytyczną notę Michała Kisiela poświęconą książce Jacques'a Derridy, Cinders, przeł. Ned Lukacher, Minneapolis, London, University of Minnesota Press, 2014 oraz Anny Maraś poświęconą książceMarianne Hirsch, The Generation of Postmemory: Writing and Visual Culture After the Holocaust, New York: Columbia University Press, 2012.
EN
This article analyses the short story collection Granice świata (“The Limits of the World”) by Kazimierz Wierzyński. It emphasises two war narratives, namely The Patrol and Sentence of Death, in which the firstperson narrator (the author himself) experiences extreme events. Wierzyński’s characters commit terrible atrocities, and the writer describes their ruthless and unexpected reactions to highly distressing episodes.
The Biblical Annals
|
2021
|
vol. 11
|
issue 1
63-78
PL
The Book of Joel abounds in the descriptions of God’s mighty acts, including his interventions in the workings of nature and the unfolding historical events in the life of Israel and the so-called heathen nations. It has long been recognized that these acts are important in structuring the book as a whole. They can be labelled as negative or positive for the life of Israel, depending on which part of the book we interpret. In the final form of the work there is a centreline between its two major parts (1:1–2:17; 2:19–4:21), separating the descriptions of divine punishment and lament from the accounts of restoration and joy when it comes to the relationship of the covenant community with God: “Then the Lord became jealous for his land, and had pity on his people” (Joel 2:18). This verse also serves as an introduction to 2:19–4:21. What has not yet been examined in detail, however, is that the descriptions of God’s working in the nations’ history and in nature can help read the book from the viewpoint of trauma/crisis and tenacity. In the midst of crises Israel’s only hope is to repent and turn to the Lord to have mercy. In repentance, the prophet’s resilience and compassion is also significant; his words are handed down to us in a form that resembles the terminology, mood and theological teaching of certain lament psalms of the Hebrew Bible, yet representing the tradition of the day of the Lord especially important in prophetic literature. This paper aims at investigating the Book of Joel from the perspec­tive of trauma and tenacity with a view to the scriptural allusions the author employs.  
6
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Noty o książkach

71%
EN
Critical notes on: (1) Alain Badiou, Rhapsody for the Theatre, edited and introduced by Bruno Bosteels, translated by Bruno Bosteels with the assistance of Martin Puchner (London, New York: Verso, 2013), pp. 174; (2) Griselda Pollock, After-affects / After-images: Trauma and aesthetic transformation in the virtual feminist museum (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2013), pp. 384.
PL
Noty krytyczne poświęcone następującym książkom: (1) Alain Badiou, Rhapsody for the Theatre, edited and introduced by Bruno Bosteels, translated by Bruno Bosteels with the assistance of Martin Puchner (London, New York: Verso, 2013), ss. 174; (2) Griselda Pollock, After-affects / After-images: Trauma and aesthetic transformation in the virtual feminist museum (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2013), ss. 384.
PL
Historia rodziny NATASCHY WODIN rzuca światło na skalę zjawiska pracy przymusowej w nazistowskich Niemczech. Ten aspekt historii Niemiec jest jak dotąd nieprzepracowany przez pamięć kulturową. Autorka ujawnia w publikowanym wywiadzie szczegóły, dotyczące poszukiwań dokumentów i pracy nad jej ostatnimi opowiadaniami Sie kam aus Mariupol (2017) / Przybyła z Mariupola oraz Irgendwo in diesem Dunkel (2018) / Gdzieś w tej ciemności. WODIN wspomina, jak trudno było jej żyć z własną historią rodzinną i opowiada o swym warsztacie pisarskim. Zapis rozmowy poprzedzony jest wprowadzeniem do twórczości NATASCHY WODIN.
EN
NATASCHA WODIN’S family story illuminates the overwhelming extent of forced labour in Germany during the years of National Socialism. This aspect of history has been neglected so far in the German cultural memory. In this present interview the author presents more information about her research and her work on her last two generational stories She Came from Mariupol (2017) and Anywhere in this Darkness (2018). WODIN recalls the problematic life with her family history and introduces us to her writing strategies. The interview is preceded by an introduction to her work.
DE
NATASCHA WODINS Familiengeschichte beleuchtet das überwältigende Ausmaß der Zwangsarbeit in Deutschland während der Zeit des Nationalsozialismus. Dieser Teil der Geschichte wurde im kulturellen Gedächtnis der Deutschen bislang vernachlässigt. Im vorliegenden Interview erörtert die Autorin die Hintergründe über die Recherche und Arbeit an ihren letzten beiden Generationserzählungen Sie kam aus Mariupol (2017) und Irgendwo in diesem Dunkel (2018). WODIN rekapituliert das schwierige Leben mit ihrer Familiengeschichte und gibt Einblick in ihre Schreibstrategien. Eine Einführung in WODINS Werk geht dem Gespräch voran.
Perspektywy Kultury
|
2024
|
vol. 45
|
issue 2
433-446
PL
Według Zygmunta Freuda powstanie religii judaistycznej należy łączyć z zabójstwem Mojżesza, którego mieli dokonać względem swojego przywódcy Hebrajczycy. Teza ta, którą psychoanalityk przejął od Ernsta Sellina, stała się podstawą jego rozważań dotyczących traumy stanowiącej źródło doświadczanej przez człowieka nerwicy na tle religijnym. W niniejszym artykule podjęto próbę wykazania, iż podłoże nerwic eklezjogennych nie należy upatrywać w traumatycznych wydarzeniach związanych z czasem wyjścia Izraelitów z Egiptu, jak chciał Freud, ale w indywidualnym podejściu człowieka do religii oraz w przeżywanych przez niego konfliktach wewnętrznych.
EN
According to Sigmund Freud, the emergence of Judaism should be associated with the murder of Moses, which the Hebrews allegedly committed against their leader. This thesis, which the psychoanalyst takes over from Ernst Sellin, became the basis for his reflections on trauma, which is the source of religious neurosis experienced by man. This paper attempts to show that the basis of neuroses related to religiousness should not be seen in the traumatic events related to the time of the Exodus of the Israelites from Egypt, as Freud wanted, but in the individual approach of a person to religion and in the internal conflicts he or she experiences.
EN
Antoni Kępiński's long-term work with the former inmates of Auschwitz concentration camp has brought an extensive scientific material, characterized by a deep understanding and empathy with the patients. Much of this work involves the issue of suffering in concentration camps. Kępiński's personal experiences from the concentration camp made him aware of the problem of bearing trauma not only from the observing position of the scientist. His publications provide an analysis of both the wide range of human suffering in the concentration camps and the reactions of the prisoners to the camp reality.
DE
Die langjährige Arbeit Antoni Kępińskis mit ehemaligen Häftlingen des Konzentrationslagers Auschwitz hat auch zu einem umfangreichen wissenschaftlichen Material geführt, gekennzeichnet von tiefem Verständnis und Empathie gegenüber den untersuchten Patienten. Ein großer Teil dieser Arbeit umfasst das Thema des Leidens im Konzentrationslager. Kępińskis persönliche Erfahrungen aus dem Konzentrationslager ließen ihn das Problem des Lager-Traumas nicht nur von der beobachtenden Position des Wissenschaftlers sehen. In seinen Publikationen findet man eine Analyse sowohl des breiten Spektrums des menschlichen Leidens in den KZ-Lagern als auch der Reaktionen der Häftlinge auf die Lagerrealität.
PL
Autorka, analizując omówienia krytycznoliterackie w codziennej prasie online, pokazuje skrajne różnice w odbiorze powieści Strefa interesów angielskiego pisarza Martina Amisa. Powieść ta zyskała uznanie krytyków w Anglii oraz Stanach Zjednoczonych, uzyskała nato-miast mało pochlebne recenzje w Niemczech. W Polsce Strefa interesów uzyskała mieszane recenzje i była słabo obecna w odbiorze czytelniczym. Według autorki spolaryzowane oceny krytyków mają związek ze zwiększoną wrażliwością narodów bezpośrednio dotkniętych polityką Trzeciej Rzeszy na nieszablonowe podejście do literatury holocaustowej, która przepracowuje traumę poprzez łamanie tabu dotyczącego Zagłady.
DE
Die Autorin analysiert die literaturkritischen Diskussionen über Martin Amis’ Roman Interessengebiet in der amerikanischen, englischen, deutschen und polnischen Tagespresse und kommt zur Schlussfolgerung, dass der Roman äußerst gemischte Rezensionen erhielt. Von den englischen und amerikanischen Literaturkritikern wurde er gut aufgenommen, von den deutschen hingegen eher negativ. In Polen wurde Interessengebiet unterschiedlich beurteilt, von den Lesern aber kaum wahrgenommen. Der Grund für die polarisierten Meinungen ist der Autorin zufolge die erhöhte Sensibilität seitens jener Nationen, die direkt von der Politik des Dritten Reiches betroffen waren, für eine unkonventionelle Herangehensweise an die Holocaust-literatur, die sich durch einen Tabubruch mit dem Holocausttrauma auseinandersetzt.
EN
The author, analysing the critical-literary discussions in online daily press, shows that Martin Amis’s The Zone of Interest received extremely mixed reviews. The novel was well received by English and American critics, but the reviews in Germany were rather negative. In Poland, The Zone of Interest received mixed reviews and the novel was hardly noticeable in the reading reception. According to the author, the reason for the polarized opinions of critics is the increased sensitivity of nations directly affected by the policy of the Third Reich to an unconventional approach to Holocaust literature, which aims to rework the trauma through breaking the Holocaust taboo.
DE
Im Artikel wird eine phänomenologische Methode angewandt, um die Emotion des Schocks zu erklären, die im Mittelpunkt der politischen Polarisierung steht. Er beantwortet die folgende Frage: Was ist dieses oft paradoxe Gefühl des Unglaubens, das wir empfinden, wenn uns etwas schockiert, und warum macht es die Menschen einander fremd? Im Gegensatz zu anderen Konzepten des Schocks (Stockdale, Osler) versuchen wir, den phänomenologischen Rahmen der "traumatischen Erfahrung" von Lorelle zu nutzen, um den positiven Aspekt des Schocks zu betonen: Wir zeigen, dass der Schock eine Erfahrung an sich ist und nicht nur ein Versagen bei der Verarbeitung von Erfahrungen. Die Schlussfolgerung ist, dass die Überraschung nicht immer als passive Anerkennung der Diskrepanz zwischen unseren Erwartungen und der Realität gesehen werden sollte, sondern dass sie als aktive Kraft anerkannt werden sollte. Auf diese Weise kann der Unglaube eine moralische Norm sein, die sich selbst bestätigt und eine Atmosphäre der Fremdheit für Menschen schafft, mit denen wir nicht einverstanden sind.
PL
Niniejszy artykuł wykorzystuje metodę fenomenologiczną do wyjaśnienia emocji szoku, która stanowi sedno polaryzacji politycznej. Odpowiada na następujące pytanie: czym jest to często paradoksalne uczucie niedowierzania, które odczuwamy, gdy coś nas szokuje, i dlaczego ono sprawia, że ludzie stają się sobie obcy? W przeciwieństwie do innych koncepcji szoku (Stockdale, Osler), staramy się wykorzystać ramy fenomenologiczne "traumatycznego doświadczenia" Lorelle'a, by podkreślić pozytywny aspekt szoku: pokazując, że szok jest doświadczeniem samym w sobie, a nie tylko niepowodzeniem w asymilacji doświadczenia. Wniosek jest taki, że zaskoczenie nie powinno być zawsze postrzegane jako bierne uznanie luki między naszymi oczekiwaniami a rzeczywistością; zamiast tego powinno być w pełni uznane za aktywną siłę. W ten sposób niedowierzanie może być standardem moralnym, który sam się potwierdza i nadaje atmosferę obcości ludziom, z którymi się nie zgadzamy.
EN
This article uses the phenomenological method to explain the emotion of shock, which is at the heart of political polarization. It answers the following question: what is this often paradoxical feeling of disbelief that we feel when we find something shocking, and why does it make people strangers to one another? Unlike other existing conceptions of shock (Stockdale, Osler), we employ the phenomenological framework of Lorelle’s “traumatic experience” to make explicit the positive aspect of shock: showing how shock is an experience in itself and not merely a failure to assimilate experience. The conclusion reached is that surprise should not be seen as always a passive acknowledgment of the gap between our expectations and reality; instead it should be fully recognized as an active force. Thus, disbelief can be a moral standard that asserts itself and imposes an aura of strangeness on the people we disagree with.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.