Search results - CEJSH

1

Spór o interpretację w literaturoznawstwie – nie taki radykalny, jak go malują

100%

Tarkowski K.

Przestrzenie Teorii

|

2017

|

issue 28

EN

This review of Tomasz Szymon Markiewka’s book, entitled Interpretation Argument in Literary Studies. Analysis of Selected Theoretical Conceptions of 20th Century, focuses on reconstruction of its main theses, as well as on evaluate their methodological aspects. The first part deals with theoretical issues, mainly of terminological decisions and relation between the literature studies and philosophy. Next, article assesses the pros and cons of the main part of the book, which contains analysis of five selected theorists’ ideas of interpretation. The final part of the review raises the issue of the method of interpretation literary texts.

2

Neopragmatism and the Question of Interdisciplinarity: The Case of Stanley Fish

93%

Małecki W.

Human Affairs

|

2009

|

vol. 19

|

issue 1

96-104

EN

The aim of the paper is to criticize Stanley Fish's views on interdisciplinarity (particularly as far as his account of interdisciplinarity in literary studies is concerned). The first part of the article consists of: (a) a summary of his critique of the so-called religion of interdisciplinarity; (b) a description of Fish's theory of disciplinarity that underlies this critique. In the second part of the article, I provide a criticism of Fish's theory. I begin by presenting some counterexamples to it. Then I attempt to demonstrate that Fish's views are self-refuting. Finally, I argue that besides these theoretical reasons, there is also a practical reason why Fish's position needs to be questioned.

3

Kategoria motta we współczesnym literaturoznawstwie

93%

Sadzińska E.

Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Litteraria Rossica

|

2011

|

issue 4

131-141

EN

In the contemporary literary studies, the category ‘motto’ has a well-established position, although one often meets an opinion that a uniform theory of universal motto has not been developed yet. This article is an attempt to synthesise the existing findings about the motto. It presents an overview of the most interesting research positions. This allows us to illustrate, in general terms, how the meaning of the motto changed from the sixteenth to the eighteenth century, and how it evolved from a very general blurry meaning to the one representing the main characteristics of intertextuality.

4

Poetyka (w) przyszłości

93%

Stanisz M., Uliasz S.

Tematy i Konteksty

|

2013

|

vol. 8

|

issue 3

11-19

EN

The given article is an introduction to the discussion devoted to poetics as a literary discipline as well as a subject of university and school teaching. It includes an attempt to order the issues connected with the philosophical foundations of the discipline, its competences and opportunities for development, its limits and constraints, its status among other literary disciplines and its functional dimension. Moreover, the authors of the article underline the ability of poetics to cover the continuously growing spectrum of literary and non-literary phenomena and to express an individual reading experience. The authors also take a look at the range of terms and categories of which poetics makes use. The given deliberations are to invite to reflection on the state of poetics in the contemporary literary studies.

PL

Artykuł stanowi wprowadzenie do dyskusji poświęconej stanowi poetyki jako dyscypliny literaturoznawczej, a także jako przedmiotu dydaktyki akademickiej i szkolnej. Zawiera próbę uporządkowania zagadnień związanych z filozoficznymi podstawami tej dyscypliny, jej kompetencjami i możliwościami rozwoju, jej granicami i ograniczeniami, jej statusem w obrębie innych dyscyplin literaturoznawczych oraz jej wymiarem funkcjonalnym. Autorzy artykułu zwracają ponadto uwagę na zdolność poetyki do ogarniania stale rosnącego spektrum zjawisk literackich i pozaliterackich oraz wyrażania indywidualnego doświadczenia lekturowego, przyglądają się także repertuarowi pojęć i kategorii, którymi się posługuje. Przedstawione tu rozważania są wstępem do refleksji nad stanem poetyki we współczesnym literaturoznawstwie. Dyskusja na ten temat została zaprezentowana w czasopiśmie "Tematy i Konteksty" 2013, nr 3 (8).

5

The First Compendium – on the 10th Anniversary of the Foundation of Tematy i Konteksty

93%

Pasterska J., Rokosz E., Stanisz M.

Tematy i Konteksty

|

2020

|

issue 1

7-9

EN

A Selection of the Decade is a special issue of Tematy i Konteksty, a literary studies journal which has been published in Poland since 2011. This special issue is a collection of articles that were published in Polish in former issues of the journal and have now been translated into English to reach English-speaking readers.

6

Masky touhy : Úvaha ajvazovská

82%

Košnarová V.

Česká literatura (Czech Literature)

|

2012

|

vol. 60

|

issue 4

517-542

EN

The interpretational study "Masks of Desire" is based on the novel by Michal Ajvaz - Cesta na jih [Journey to the South] although its line of argument takes considerable account of the author´s entire fictional and theoretical output to date, as the connection both between individual fictional texts and between them and the theoretical texts is very close and evident here. First the study casts doubt on the classification of Michal Ajvaz´s work as postmodernist, as this only applies - as in the case of other "labels" (magic Prague literature, magical realism) that have been stuck on Ajvaz´s work - on the basis of superficial similarities. This study does not refute the association with formal principles of discourse that is designated postmodern, but it does stress that Ajvaz´s work departs intellectually from such discourse, while referring at the same time to the author´s repeated polemics with postmodernism at the level of theoretical considerations. Attention is also focused on the concept of the "total void", the intertextual and self-reflective aspect of the author´s work, the relationship to myth or the motif of desire and the specific conception of the erotic.

7

Materialistyczna krytyka literacka – niedokończony projekt [rec. Joseph North: Literary Criticism. A Concise Political History. Cambridge– Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 2017, ss. 272.]

82%

Trzeciak K.

Śląskie Studia Polonistyczne

|

2018

|

vol. 12

|

issue 2

167-180

EN

The article is an extensive review of Joseph North’s book Literary Criticism: A Concise Political History. The author divides the 20th and 21st century literary studies into two orientations: critics and researchers, showing that the domination of the research perspective from the 80s led to a paradoxical depoliticization of criticism and deprivation of its intervention potential. To restore the critical potential, North postulates a return to materialistic aesthetics under the sign of I.A. Richards, which allows him to cross the research horizon in a gesture of intervention into a common reality, justified by a specific aesthetic experience.

8

KOMPARATYSTYKA NA POGRANICZU DZIEDZIN

81%

JULKOWSKA V.

Historia@Teoria

|

2017

|

vol. 2

|

issue 4

67-81

EN

Th e purpose of the article is to show comparatistics as a promising perspective of current humanistic research, especially in area of extending possibilities of analysis and interpretation. In times of profesionalization and specialization of knowledge, comparative research are rarely undertaken and for that reason, it makes a cognitively and interpretatively interesting situation. Th e case analysis applies to using comparative method on the ground of history of historiography (A. Kożuchowski) and literary studies (D. Zawadzka).

PL

The purpose of the article is to show comparatistics as a promising perspective of current humanistic research, especially in area of extending possibilities of analysis and interpretation. In times of profesionalization and specialization of knowledge, comparative research are rarely undertaken and for that reason, it makes a cognitively and interpretatively interesting situation. The case analysis applies to using comparative method on the ground of history of historiography (A. Kożuchowski) and literary studies (D. Zawadzka).

9

81%

Śmieja W.

Pamiętnik Literacki

|

2019

|

vol. 110

|

issue 2

219-225

PL

Autor recenzji omawia książkę "Masculinities and Literary Studies. Intersections and New Directions", poświęconą związkom między krytycznymi studiami nad mężczyznami i męskością a literaturoznawstwem. Rekonstruuje pozycję „badań męskościowych” na przecięciu nauk społecznych i humanistycznych. Na podstawie najbardziej aktualnych publikacji zwraca uwagę na zjawiska kryzysowe w ich obrębie, a także na możliwości rozwoju. Omawiany tom wpisuje się w pejzaż teoretyczny i wskazuje nowe obszary dociekań w ramach literaturoznawstwa i badań męskości.

EN

The reviewer discusses the book entitled "Masculinities and Literary Studies. Intersections and New Directions" devoted to the connections between the critical studies in males, masculinity and literary studies. He reconstructs the position of masculinity research at the crossroads of social sciences and the humanities. As based on the latest publications, he points at the crises found within their scope and at the developmental potential. The volume in question finds its place in a theoretical base and points at new spheres of investigations within the framework of literary studies and research in masculinity.

16

An Academic Discipline at a Crossroads. The Different Approaches to Teaching Literature in Warsaw and in Vilnius in the years 1811‒1830 — an Initial Analysis

70%

Markowska H.

Zagadnienia Rodzajów Literackich

|

2016

|

vol. 59/120 z. 4

35-46

EN

The article’s goal is to reflect on the perception of literary studies as an academic discipline in the 19th century Poland in the twenties and the thirties. The answer to this question may be found in lectures given in that time period at the University of Warsaw and at Vilnius University. The author analyzes excerpts of works by L. Borowski, E. Słowacki, L. Osiński and K. Brodziński in which they define the object of their studies and extrapolate on their methodological tenets. The analysis concludes with an attempt at defining the foremost tendencies in Polish literary studies of the time period, especially in regards to the relationship between the history of literature, literary theory and literary criticism.

17

Dramatyzacja tradycji. Dramaturgiczne konfrontacje z kanonem literackim

70%

Dobrowolski P.

Przestrzenie Teorii

|

2021

|

issue 36

33-55

EN

The article opens with a statement that dramaturgical creativity, long marginalized by literary studies, has returned to the area of its interest together with its researchers’ use of the achievements of performative and cultural turns. Taking these into account allows us to treat drama as a distinctive literary practice in which the reception of a text is exemplary. As the author claims, with the New Humanities, integrating scattered reading perspectives known to the history of literary studies into the horizons of New Positivity, dramatic studies enrich this standpoint and maintain a critical view making creative use of the antagonism of perspectives, confrontation of attitudes, conflict of qualities or different visions and ideas. The potential tensions revealed in the practice of active reading of a literary text in accordance with the dramatic matrix guarantee the positive effects of each act of engaged reading. The dramatization of tradition is a specific field of critical dialogue between the reader and the existing literary tradition. Three dramatic works by Jan Czapliński are indicated as examples of mediators for this dialogue. The work of this playwright presents and suggests a critical reading of the characters and works of Gabriela Zapolska, Henryk Sienkiewicz and Adam Mickiewicz, leading to the emancipation of their works that is situated beyond the framework of the discursively created, existing canon of contemporary Polish literature and culture. A critical view enriches and updates the canon. Dramatization, which allows the revaluation of existing values, appears as the basic category of contemporary art – revealing existing, usually ineffable conflicts and using them to build new, positive values.

18

Between literature and press studies: Bibliometric analysis of Krzysztof Woźniakowski’s publications, 1973–2020

70%

Kolasa W. M.

Rocznik Historii Prasy Polskiej

|

2021

|

issue 1

19

„Panorama badań aksjologicznych we współczesnym literaturoznawstwie polskim” (polemiczne dopowiedzenia)

70%

Obremski K.

Tematy i Konteksty

|

2022

|

vol. 17

|

issue 12

425-432

EN

This publication contains polemic commentaries to the text by BeataGarlej „Panorama badań aksjologicznych we współczesnym literaturoznawstwie polskim” [Panorama of axiological research in contemporary Polish literary studies] („Tematy i Konteksty” 11(16)/2021). This publication has been divided into three parts: “Lublin school (KUL school)”, “Torun school” and “Warsaw school”. The lack of the authoress’s explanations of her understanding of the term ‘school’ allows tooverestimate the significance of “Torun school” and underestimate the significance of “»Garden« school”.

PL

Publikacja zawiera polemiczne dopowiedzenia do tekstu Beaty Garlej „Panorama badań aksjologicznych we współczesnym literaturoznawstwie polskim” („Tematy i Konteksty” 11(16)/2021). Publikacja ta została podzielona na trzy części: „Szkoła lubelska (KUL-owska”), „Szkoła toruńska”, „Szkoła warszawska”. Brak wyjaśnienia Autorki jak jest przez nią rozumiane słowo „szkoła” sprzyja przeszacowaniu „szkoły toruńskiej” i niedoszacowaniu „szkoły »Ogrodu«”.

20

Wstęp

70%

Bazarnik K.

ER(R)GO: Teoria – Literatura – Kultura

|

2016

|

issue 32

EN

The guest editor's preface devoted to the key ideas for the contemporary literary theory and liberature, which introduces the debates foregrounded in this issue.

PL

Wstęp autorstwa redaktorki gościnnej wprowadzający kluczowe zagadnienia dla liberatury, współczesnej teorii literatury i komentujący zagadnienia, którym poświęcony jest niniejszy numer.

Refine search results