Gilson, Krapiec and Christian Philosophy Today

• Authors: Paweł Tarasiewicz
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

The author undertakes an attempt to answer the following question: is Christian philosophy possible today? The question seems to be of great importance due to the fact that what Christians who try to do philosophy usually encounter is bitter criticism which comes to them from two sides at once: that of academy and that of the Church. In short, for academy their philosophy is too Christian, and for the Church it is too academic. Being indebted to the insights of Étienne Gilson and Mieczyslaw A. Krapiec (the original Polish spelling: Mieczysław Albert Krąpiec, pronounced: myechisuaf albert krompyetz), the author comes to the conclusion that Christian philosophy is possible today only if: 1) it is not identified with the art of persuasion, as its final end lies in gaining understanding rather than being convincing, 2) it is the work of a Christian, and 3) it has the real world as its object and metaphysics as its method. For Christian philosophy—which in essence consists in doing philosophy by Christians in order to get more rational understanding of their religious faith—should be identified with the perfection of the intellect achieved by practicing the classical philosophy of being.

Keywords

EN

Christian philosophy; Gilson; Krapiec; metaphysics; university; Church; faith; theology; evangelization

• Publisher: International Étienne Gilson Society
• Journal: Studia Gilsoniana
• Year: 2015
• Volume: 4
• Issue: 4
• Pages: 281-392

Dates

published

2015-12-30

Contributors

author

Paweł Tarasiewicz

• Adler–Aquinas Institute, Manitou Springs, CO, USA

Identifiers

ISSN

2300-0066